Published in Qual Health Res on January 01, 2017
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med (2009) 35.37
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care (2007) 24.41
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol (2007) 13.46
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol (2008) 7.42
Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res (1998) 6.95
Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med (2005) 6.17
Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol (2006) 5.13
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J (2009) 4.65
The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs (2005) 4.12
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med (2013) 3.64
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol (2012) 2.85
Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review. J Public Health (Oxf) (2011) 2.70
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med (2014) 2.35
Qualitative metasynthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qual Health Res (2004) 2.04
Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health (1997) 1.83
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. BMC Med (2013) 1.50
Adapting to and managing diabetes. Image J Nurs Sch (1998) 1.45
Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nurs Res (2003) 1.42
Chronic illness experience: insights from a metastudy. Qual Health Res (2002) 1.22
Reading, writing and systematic review. J Adv Nurs (2008) 1.15
Reviews of qualitative evidence: a new milestone for Cochrane. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 1.05
Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal. BMC Med (2013) 1.00
When a cigar is not just a cigar: alternative takes on data and data analysis. Res Nurs Health (2011) 0.84
"Meta-Jeopardy": the crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis. Nurs Outlook (2006) 0.82
Using Sandelowski and Barroso's Meta-Synthesis Method in Advancing Qualitative Evidence. Qual Health Res (2015) 0.79
Meta-Study as Diagnostic: Toward Content Over Form in Qualitative Synthesis. Qual Health Res (2015) 0.79
Research letter: Metasynthesis - Fairy tale of a nursing sleeping beauty. Int J Nurs Stud (2016) 0.78
A matter of taste: evaluating the quality of qualitative research. Nurs Inq (2014) 0.78
"Distorted into clarity": a methodological case study illustrating the paradox of systematic review. Res Nurs Health (2008) 0.78
Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness? Milbank Q (2016) 0.78
The Future of Theory-Generating Meta-Synthesis Research. Qual Health Res (2015) 0.77
It's a sentence, not a word: insights from a keyword analysis in cancer communication. Qual Health Res (2014) 0.75