Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 28002557)

Published in JAMA Surg on April 01, 2017

Authors

Linnea Langhans1, Maj-Britt Jensen2, Maj-Lis M Talman3, Ilse Vejborg4, Niels Kroman1, Tove F Tvedskov1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Plastic Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
3: Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
4: Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Articles cited by this

Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2002) 18.61

Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med (2012) 13.49

The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health (2011) 12.93

Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol (2007) 3.04

The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol (2007) 2.32

Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2010. JAMA Surg (2014) 2.26

The Danish Pathology Register. Scand J Public Health (2011) 2.14

Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol (2009) 2.02

Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ (2012) 1.84

The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise. Acta Oncol (2008) 1.78

Influence of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg (2007) 1.48

Locoregional treatment of primary breast cancer: consensus recommendations from an International Expert Panel. Cancer (2010) 1.47

Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol (2001) 1.38

Systematic review of radioguided surgery for non-palpable breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol (2011) 1.35

Mammography screening in Denmark. Dan Med Bull (2011) 1.22

Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions. Am J Surg (2009) 1.21

St. Gallen 2013: brief preliminary summary of the consensus discussion. Breast Care (Basel) (2013) 1.21

The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast-conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer. Am J Surg (2008) 1.19

The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol (2014) 1.18

Radioactive seed localization for non-palpable breast cancer (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 582-588). Br J Surg (2013) 1.10

Radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 1,000 consecutive procedures at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol (2011) 1.07

Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics. Ann Surg (2002) 1.03

Factors influencing cosmetic outcome in breast conservation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) (2009) 1.02

Palpable breast cancers are inherently different from nonpalpable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol (2001) 0.97

Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol (2006) 0.96

Re-resection rates after breast-conserving surgery as a performance indicator: introduction of a case-mix model to allow comparison between Dutch hospitals. Eur J Surg Oncol (2011) 0.92

Heading toward radioactive seed localization in non-palpable breast cancer surgery? A meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol (2014) 0.90

Radioactive seed localisation (RSL) in the treatment of non-palpable breast cancers: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast (2013) 0.90

Association of Breast Conservation Surgery for Cancer With 90-Day Reoperation Rates in New York State. JAMA Surg (2016) 0.83

Overall survival in patients with a re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort. Eur J Cancer (2014) 0.81

Surgical margins after needle-localization breast biopsy. Am J Surg (1995) 0.81

Risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Breast (2014) 0.80

Pre-operative factors indicating risk of multiple operations versus a single operation in women undergoing surgery for screen detected breast cancer. Breast (2012) 0.78

The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study. Ann Surg Oncol (2015) 0.77