Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 28116047)

Published in Ecol Evol on December 20, 2016

Authors

Jeremy S Davis1, Dean M Castillo1, Leonie C Moyle1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Biology Indiana University Bloomington IN USA.

Articles cited by this

Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature (1996) 10.61

Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature (2000) 4.71

Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (1998) 3.90

Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Mol Biol Evol (2002) 3.84

Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol (2001) 3.76

Gene flow and natural selection in the origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Genetics (1997) 2.95

Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science (2002) 2.86

The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. Anim Behav (1967) 2.79

The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature (2003) 2.73

Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature (1995) 2.63

Nucleotide sequence analysis of Adh genes estimates the time of geographic isolation of the Bogota population of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1991) 2.48

Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster. Science (2010) 2.31

Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science (2000) 2.31

Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol (2010) 1.65

The genomics of speciation in Drosophila: diversity, divergence, and introgression estimated using low-coverage genome sequencing. PLoS Genet (2009) 1.63

Postcopulatory sexual selection generates speciation phenotypes in Drosophila. Curr Biol (2013) 1.61

Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory: a re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Behav Genet (2006) 1.58

Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol Evol (1987) 1.41

The genetics and ecology of reinforcement: implications for the evolution of prezygotic isolation in sympatry and beyond. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2009) 1.11

Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2006) 1.10

Molecular social interactions: Drosophila melanogaster seminal fluid proteins as a case study. Adv Genet (2010) 1.03

Quantifying the gender load: can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2006) 1.03

Experimental removal and elevation of sexual selection: does sexual selection generate manipulative males and resistant females? Am Nat (2005) 1.01

Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2013) 0.95

Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: an examination of the trading-up and intrinsic male-quality hypotheses. J Evol Biol (2005) 0.95

Rapid diversification of sperm precedence traits and processes among three sibling Drosophila species. Evolution (2013) 0.90

Failure to replicate two mate preference QTLs across multiple strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura. J Hered (2008) 0.87

Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Evolution (2005) 0.84

An analytical framework for estimating fertilization bias and the fertilization set from multiple sperm-storage organs. Am Nat (2013) 0.82

Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Behav Genet (2005) 0.77

A further analysis of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura and D. persimilis : rejoinder to Noor and Ortíz-Barrientos. Behav Genet (2006) 0.77