PRECISION MANAGEMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 28133630)

Published in Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev on December 12, 2016

Authors

David J VanderWeele1, Baris Turkbey2, Adam G Sowalsky1

Author Affiliations

1: Laboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
2: Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Articles cited by this

(truncated to the top 100)

Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med (2009) 35.94

Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin (2016) 32.95

Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med (2009) 30.05

Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA (1998) 21.31

Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med (2012) 15.83

Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst (2012) 11.91

Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet (2014) 11.01

Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA (2015) 9.02

ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol (2012) 8.86

Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA (2005) 8.72

10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med (2016) 5.71

Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell (2015) 5.29

Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol (2007) 5.23

Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol (2015) 5.00

Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival of patients with node-positive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2014) 4.77

External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study. Lancet Oncol (2010) 4.61

Trends in Metastatic Breast and Prostate Cancer--Lessons in Cancer Dynamics. N Engl J Med (2015) 4.58

Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol (2004) 4.41

The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol (2005) 4.40

Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med (2016) 4.31

Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and external-beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term results of RTOG 8610. J Clin Oncol (2008) 4.11

Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds. J Urol (2011) 4.01

An update of the Gleason grading system. J Urol (2009) 3.68

Evaluation of Hybrid ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy. J Nucl Med (2015) 3.41

The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer. Cell (2015) 3.29

Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. Eur Urol (2011) 3.19

A molecular correlate to the Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2006) 2.89

Targeted prostate cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the initial screening round of the IMPACT study. Eur Urol (2014) 2.81

Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol (2015) 2.76

Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2010) 2.65

Urine TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript stratifies prostate cancer risk in men with elevated serum PSA. Sci Transl Med (2011) 2.62

Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline. J Urol (2013) 2.59

Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume with histopathology. J Urol (2012) 2.55

Improving the Specificity of Screening for Lethal Prostate Cancer Using Prostate-specific Antigen and a Panel of Kallikrein Markers: A Nested Case-Control Study. Eur Urol (2015) 2.41

APTIMA PCA3 molecular urine test: development of a method to aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clin Chem (2006) 2.39

Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer. J Urol (2009) 2.39

Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? Radiology (2010) 2.38

Prostate cancer: can multiparametric MR imaging help identify patients who are candidates for active surveillance? Radiology (2013) 2.35

Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol (2013) 2.26

Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2013) 2.25

Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. J Urol (2008) 2.22

Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Plus PCA3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment. Eur Urol (2015) 2.20

Prognostic value of a cell cycle progression signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort. Br J Cancer (2012) 2.15

Gleason Upgrading with Time in a Large Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort. J Urol (2015) 2.14

Changes in prostate cancer grade on serial biopsy in men undergoing active surveillance. J Clin Oncol (2011) 2.08

Divergent clonal evolution of castration-resistant neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Nat Med (2016) 2.04

What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database. J Urol (2008) 2.02

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2007) 1.92

Prostate cancer screening: facts, statistics, and interpretation in response to the US Preventive Services Task Force Review. J Clin Oncol (2012) 1.82

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. standard care in men being evaluated for prostate cancer: a randomized study. Urol Oncol (2014) 1.75

Analytical validation of the Oncotype DX prostate cancer assay - a clinical RT-PCR assay optimized for prostate needle biopsies. BMC Genomics (2013) 1.70

A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol (2014) 1.69

Correlation between serum prostate-specific antigen and cancer volume in prostate glands of different sizes. Urology (2010) 1.64

Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2011) 1.45

Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology (2013) 1.42

Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use. Eur Urol (2015) 1.39

The genetic epidemiology of prostate cancer and its clinical implications. Nat Rev Urol (2013) 1.39

Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: an evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinations. Magn Reson Med (2012) 1.34

Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis. J Urol (2013) 1.30

Management of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after local therapy: evolving standards of care and new directions. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol (2013) 1.22

Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging. Radiology (2015) 1.16

Clonal progression of prostate cancers from Gleason grade 3 to grade 4. Cancer Res (2012) 1.12

Analysis of percent free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer detection: influence of total PSA, prostate volume, and age. Urology (1996) 1.12

Gleason grade progression is uncommon. Cancer Res (2013) 1.09

Decipher Genomic Classifier Measured on Prostate Biopsy Predicts Metastasis Risk. Urology (2016) 1.03

PTEN loss is associated with upgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy. Mod Pathol (2014) 1.02

Which, when and why? Rational use of tissue-based molecular testing in localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2015) 1.02

Validation of an RNA cell cycle progression score for predicting death from prostate cancer in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort. Br J Cancer (2015) 0.95

National trends in the management of low and intermediate risk prostate cancer in the United States. J Urol (2014) 0.95

Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection. J Urol (2016) 0.95

Development and clinical validation of an in situ biopsy-based multimarker assay for risk stratification in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2015) 0.95

Global Incidence and Mortality for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of Temporal Patterns and Trends in 36 Countries. Eur Urol (2016) 0.93

Association analysis of 9,560 prostate cancer cases from the International Consortium of Prostate Cancer Genetics confirms the role of reported prostate cancer associated SNPs for familial disease. Hum Genet (2013) 0.93

Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy. Abdom Imaging (2015) 0.91

Finding the Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: The 4Kscore Is a Novel Blood Test That Can Accurately Identify the Risk of Aggressive Prostate Cancer. Rev Urol (2015) 0.91

Clinical performance of serum [-2]proPSA derivatives, %p2PSA and PHI, in the detection and management of prostate cancer. Am J Clin Exp Urol (2014) 0.91

Low-grade prostate cancer diverges early from high grade and metastatic disease. Cancer Sci (2014) 0.90

Use of different definitions of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy changes conclusions about relative treatment efficacy for localized prostate cancer. Urology (2006) 0.89

Interobserver Reproducibility of the PI-RADS Version 2 Lexicon: A Multicenter Study of Six Experienced Prostate Radiologists. Radiology (2016) 0.89

Computer-extracted Features Can Distinguish Noncancerous Confounding Disease from Prostatic Adenocarcinoma at Multiparametric MR Imaging. Radiology (2015) 0.87

The incremental value of contrast-enhanced MRI in the detection of biopsy-proven local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: effect of reader experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2012) 0.87

Prostate tumour volumes: evaluation of the agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and histology using novel co-registration software. BJU Int (2014) 0.86

Prostate cancer risk prediction based on complete prostate cancer family history. Prostate (2014) 0.84

Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy. J Urol (2016) 0.83

Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging with digital histopathology in prostate. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg (2015) 0.80

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion-assisted biopsy for the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol (2015) 0.80

Computer aided-diagnosis of prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI: a technical review of current research. Biomed Res Int (2014) 0.80

Review of the literature: PCA3 for prostate cancer risk assessment and prognostication. Rev Urol (2011) 0.80

PTEN loss and chromosome 8 alterations in Gleason grade 3 prostate cancer cores predicts the presence of un-sampled grade 4 tumor: implications for active surveillance. Mod Pathol (2016) 0.78

Association of multiparametric MRI quantitative imaging features with prostate cancer gene expression in MRI-targeted prostate biopsies. Oncotarget (2016) 0.78

Accuracy and agreement of PIRADSv2 for prostate cancer mpMRI: A multireader study. J Magn Reson Imaging (2016) 0.78

A 22 Gene-expression Assay, Decipher® (GenomeDx Biosciences) to Predict Five-year Risk of Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Men Treated with Radical Prostatectomy. PLoS Curr (2015) 0.77

Prostate-specific antigen screening: a critical review of current research and guidelines. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract (2014) 0.77

Development and validation of a 24-gene predictor of response to postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a matched, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol (2016) 0.77

The PROFILE Feasibility Study: Targeted Screening of Men With a Family History of Prostate Cancer. Oncologist (2016) 0.76

Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Features and PTEN Expression of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2016) 0.76

The need for more aggressive therapy for men with Gleason 9-10 disease compared to Gleason ≤8 high-risk prostate cancer. Tumori (2016) 0.76

RNA biomarkers to facilitate the identification of aggressive prostate cancer. Mol Aspects Med (2015) 0.76

Apparent diffusion coefficient value is a strong predictor of unsuspected aggressiveness of prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. World J Urol (2016) 0.76

Words of wisdom: Re: Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. Eur Urol (2011) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Positron emission tomography (PET) in primary prostate cancer staging and risk assessment. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75