Auditory Stimulus Detection Partially Depends on Visuospatial Attentional Resources.

PubWeight™: 0.77‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 28203353)

Published in Iperception on January 01, 2017

Authors

Basil Wahn1, Supriya Murali1, Scott Sinnett2, Peter König3

Author Affiliations

1: Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
2: Department of Psychology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawai'i, USA.
3: Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Articles cited by this

Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature (2002) 13.46

QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept Psychophys (1983) 8.19

Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull (1994) 5.86

Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spat Vis (1988) 5.10

Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nat Rev Neurosci (2008) 4.81

Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science (1983) 2.98

Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends Cogn Sci (2005) 2.90

Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends Cogn Sci (2005) 2.83

Color and luminance contrasts attract independent attention. Curr Biol (2002) 2.57

A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annu Rev Psychol (2011) 2.46

Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved FMRI. Neuron (2006) 2.27

How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. J Vis (2007) 2.07

Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. Nature (1997) 1.96

Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Curr Biol (2005) 1.80

Sound enhances visual perception: cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2000) 1.74

Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time. Percept Psychophys (2004) 1.59

Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (1998) 1.54

The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention. Percept Psychophys (2000) 1.40

Separate attentional resources for vision and audition. Proc Biol Sci (2006) 1.23

Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task. Neuropsychologia (2001) 1.23

Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited. Percept Psychophys (2007) 1.18

Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration. Exp Brain Res (2007) 1.16

Disintegration of multisensory signals from the real hand reduces default limb self-attribution: an fMRI study. J Neurosci (2013) 1.14

Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness. Atten Percept Psychophys (2011) 1.11

Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration. Exp Brain Res (2007) 1.10

The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation. Acta Psychol (Amst) (2008) 1.01

Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. J Vis (2008) 0.99

The neural basis of attentional control in visual search. Trends Cogn Sci (2014) 0.96

Manipulating inattentional blindness within and across sensory modalities. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) (2006) 0.93

Attentional and perceptual sources of the auditory attentional blink. Percept Psychophys (2005) 0.92

Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration. Front Psychol (2015) 0.90

Effect of attentional load on audiovisual speech perception: evidence from ERPs. Front Psychol (2014) 0.90

Predictive coding and multisensory integration: an attentional account of the multisensory mind. Front Integr Neurosci (2015) 0.89

Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load. Multisens Res (2015) 0.89

Vision and audition do not share attentional resources in sustained tasks. Front Psychol (2011) 0.89

Behavioral evidence for task-dependent "what" versus "where" processing within and across modalities. Percept Psychophys (2008) 0.89

Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli. Exp Brain Res (2008) 0.88

Attentional Resource Allocation in Visuotactile Processing Depends on the Task, But Optimal Visuotactile Integration Does Not Depend on Attentional Resources. Front Integr Neurosci (2016) 0.88

When vision 'extinguishes' touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect. Exp Brain Res (2008) 0.88

Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets. Percept Psychophys (2002) 0.87

A signal detection study of the Colavita visual dominance effect. Exp Brain Res (2009) 0.86

Load-induced inattentional deafness. Atten Percept Psychophys (2015) 0.85

Multisensory teamwork: using a tactile or an auditory display to exchange gaze information improves performance in joint visual search. Ergonomics (2015) 0.83

Processing of multisensory spatial congruency can be dissociated from working memory and visuo-spatial attention. Eur J Neurosci (2007) 0.82

Hearing while blinking: multisensory attentional blink revisited. J Neurosci (2011) 0.80

Spatial selection and target identification are separable processes in visual search. J Vis (2010) 0.79

Pupil Sizes Scale with Attentional Load and Task Experience in a Multiple Object Tracking Task. PLoS One (2016) 0.79

Extending visual dominance over touch for input off the body. Brain Res (2010) 0.79

Concurrent brain responses to separate auditory and visual targets. J Neurophysiol (2015) 0.77

Existence of competing modality dominances. Atten Percept Psychophys (2016) 0.77

A matter of attention: Crossmodal congruence enhances and impairs performance in a novel trimodal matching paradigm. Neuropsychologia (2015) 0.76