Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 28203385)

Published in JRSM Open on January 01, 2017

Authors

Mahmoud Radwan1, Ali Akbari Sari2, Arash Rashidian2, Amirhossein Takian1, Sanaa Abou-Dagga3, Aymen Elsous1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2: School of Public Health, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
3: Department of Research Affairs and Graduates Studies, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine.

Articles cited by this

A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA (1992) 22.27

Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol (1993) 18.09

Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA (2009) 13.69

Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care (2003) 12.01

Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2008) 5.28

Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (1995) 4.14

Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ (2010) 3.33

Failure of clinical practice guidelines to meet institute of medicine standards: Two more decades of little, if any, progress. Arch Intern Med (2012) 2.81

Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care (2011) 2.75

The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care (2010) 2.26

Conflict of interest disclosures for clinical practice guidelines in the national guideline clearinghouse. PLoS One (2012) 1.43

Systematic review of economic evaluations and cost analyses of guideline implementation strategies. Eur J Health Econ (2007) 1.29

Author's specialty and conflicts of interest contribute to conflicting guidelines for screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.28

Quality of low back pain guidelines improved. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2009) 1.09

Systematic review of the methodological quality of clinical guideline development for the management of chronic disease in Europe. Health Policy (2012) 1.04

Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for acute gastroenteritis in children with the AGREE instrument. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr (2011) 1.02

Adapting valid clinical guidelines for use in primary care in low and middle income countries. Prim Care Respir J (2008) 1.00

Management recommendations for knee osteoarthritis: how usable are they? Joint Bone Spine (2010) 0.96

Appraisal of WHO guidelines in maternal health using the AGREE II assessment tool. PLoS One (2012) 0.94

Improving the reliability of clinical practice guideline appraisals: effects of the Korean AGREE II scoring guide. J Korean Med Sci (2014) 0.94

Implementing clinical guidelines in stroke: a qualitative study of perceived facilitators and barriers. Health Policy (2013) 0.94

Analysis of quality of clinical practice guidelines for otorhinolaryngology in China. PLoS One (2013) 0.88

Should guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences? J Gen Intern Med (2009) 0.86

Multi-level barriers analysis to promote guideline based nursing care: a leadership strategy from home health care. J Nurs Manag (2013) 0.84

Guidelines for guidelines: measuring trustworthiness. J Clin Oncol (2013) 0.81

The quality of clinical practice guidelines in China: a systematic assessment. J Eval Clin Pract (2012) 0.81