Published in Circ Res on April 03, 2017
Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med (2005) 41.68
Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol (2010) 27.58
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov (2011) 22.33
Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature (2012) 20.64
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol (1996) 20.25
Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature (2014) 15.71
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature (2012) 14.63
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA (1999) 12.96
Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature (2014) 9.15
Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS One (2009) 7.60
1,026 experimental treatments in acute stroke. Ann Neurol (2006) 7.23
Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol (1995) 6.94
Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Stroke (2009) 6.79
Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Med (2010) 6.27
Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke (1999) 6.18
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet (2014) 6.07
Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ (2004) 5.99
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet (2014) 5.37
Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nat Biotechnol (2014) 5.32
Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ (2006) 5.05
Preclinical research: Make mouse studies work. Nature (2014) 4.82
The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research. PLoS Biol (2015) 4.68
Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA (2009) 4.48
Translation of research evidence from animals to humans. JAMA (2006) 4.48
Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2010) 4.39
Pooling of animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and publication bias. Stroke (2004) 4.37
Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler (2008) 4.05
Nimodipine in animal model experiments of focal cerebral ischemia: a systematic review. Stroke (2001) 3.90
Evidence for the efficacy of NXY-059 in experimental focal cerebral ischaemia is confounded by study quality. Stroke (2008) 3.87
Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2013) 3.67
How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke? Trends Neurosci (2007) 3.67
Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med (2012) 3.63
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoS One (2013) 3.59
The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2011) 3.42
Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ (2006) 3.34
Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical research. Surgery (2014) 3.20
Systematic review and metaanalysis of the efficacy of FK506 in experimental stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2005) 3.20
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies. PLoS Biol (2014) 3.17
Empirical evidence of bias in the design of experimental stroke studies: a metaepidemiologic approach. Stroke (2008) 2.98
Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement. PLoS Biol (2015) 2.93
Poorly cited articles in peer-reviewed cardiovascular journals from 1997 to 2007: analysis of 5-year citation rates. Circulation (2015) 2.68
A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies, to fully integrate the Three Rs, and to make systematic reviews more feasible. Altern Lab Anim (2010) 2.67
Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers. BMC Med Res Methodol (2004) 2.57
How to make more published research true. PLoS Med (2014) 2.55
Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PLoS One (2012) 2.55
Six red flags for suspect work. Nature (2013) 2.51
Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circ Res (2015) 2.32
Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis. I. Background, goals, and general strategy. J Clin Epidemiol (1995) 2.32
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature (2016) 2.29
Percentile ranking and citation impact of a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded cardiovascular R01 grants. Circ Res (2014) 2.08
Prognostic effect size of cardiovascular biomarkers in datasets from observational studies versus randomised trials: meta-epidemiology study. BMJ (2011) 1.97
Threats to validity in the design and conduct of preclinical efficacy studies: a systematic review of guidelines for in vivo animal experiments. PLoS Med (2013) 1.92
Getting pharmaceutical R&D back on target. Nat Chem Biol (2011) 1.90
SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol (2014) 1.72
Systematic reviews of animal experiments. Lancet (2002) 1.70
Impact of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Supported Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research, 1998 to 2012. Circulation (2015) 1.42
Prior publication productivity, grant percentile ranking, and topic-normalized citation impact of NHLBI cardiovascular R01 grants. Circ Res (2014) 1.35
The need for randomization in animal trials: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One (2014) 1.22
All is not well in the world of translational research. J Am Coll Cardiol (2007) 1.17
Distinguishing between exploratory and confirmatory preclinical research will improve translation. PLoS Biol (2014) 1.15
Whole animal experiments should be more like human randomized controlled trials. PLoS Biol (2013) 1.05
A mouse's house may ruin experiments. Nature (2016) 1.03
Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine. FASEB J (2015) 1.02
Systematic reviews of animal studies; missing link in translational research? PLoS One (2014) 0.90
Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment: Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circ Res (2015) 0.82
Methodological Quality of Experimental Stroke Studies Published in the Stroke Journal: Time Trends and Effect of the Basic Science Checklist. Stroke (2015) 0.80
Complying With the National Institutes of Health Guidelines and Principles for Rigor and Reproducibility: Refutations. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2016) 0.79
Reporting Standards for Preclinical Studies of Stroke Therapy. Stroke (2016) 0.76