Minimum Volume Discussion in the Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Current Status and Relevance of Surgeon and Hospital Volume regarding Result Quality and the Impact on Health Economics.

Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med (2002) 11.14

The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med (2015) 4.35

Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg (2002) 3.32

Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet (2000) 2.92

Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg (1999) 2.37

Measuring the Volume-Outcome Relation for Complex Hospital Surgery. Appl Health Econ Health Policy (2016) 1.99

Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 1.91

Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship. Arch Surg (2007) 1.73

Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: an analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg (2014) 1.61

Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma--experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma. Tumori (1995) 1.60

[Minimum thresholds under scrutiny]. Chirurg (2014) 1.42

Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg (2004) 1.41

Evidence of the effect of 'specialization' on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex. Br J Surg (2003) 1.32

Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg (2006) 1.31

Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization. CMAJ (2003) 1.22

Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol (2010) 1.17

Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg (2001) 0.98

Prognostic factors influencing the survival of patients with colon cancer receiving adjuvant 5-FU treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol (2008) 0.97

The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2008) 0.97

Patient survival after surgical treatment of rectal cancer: impact of surgeon and hospital characteristics. Cancer (2014) 0.92

Long-term results of 2 adjuvant trials reveal differences in chemosensitivity and the pattern of metastases between colon cancer and rectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer (2012) 0.89

Quality assurance in the treatment of colorectal cancer: the EURECCA initiative. Ann Oncol (2014) 0.89

Who performs proctectomy for rectal cancer in the United States? Dis Colon Rectum (2011) 0.85

High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery. Surgery (2015) 0.84

Association of surgeon volume and hospital volume with the outcome of patients receiving definitive surgery for colorectal cancer: A nationwide population-based study. Cancer (2015) 0.84

A combined measure of procedural volume and outcome to assess hospital quality of colorectal cancer surgery, a secondary analysis of clinical audit data. PLoS One (2014) 0.82

Adequacy of lymph node examination in colorectal surgery: contribution of the hospital versus the surgeon. Med Care (2013) 0.80

[Quality criteria for treatment of colorectal cancer. From a surgeon's viewpoint]. Chirurg (2010) 0.77

Influence of Individual Surgeon Volume on Oncological Outcome of Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Int J Surg Oncol (2015) 0.77

Colorectal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it. Updates Surg (2016) 0.77

Colorectal specialization and survival in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis (2016) 0.77