Regular Is Longer.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 28932381)

Published in Iperception on September 13, 2017

Authors

Kyoshiro Sasaki1, Yuki Yamada2

Author Affiliations

1: Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan; Faculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
2: Faculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Articles cited by this

Timing and time perception: a review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Atten Percept Psychophys (2010) 2.56

Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. J Vis (2007) 1.91

Integration of local features into global shapes: monkey and human FMRI studies. Neuron (2003) 1.78

Time, change, and motion: the effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Percept Psychophys (1995) 1.72

Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2009) 1.62

Object-completion effects in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb Cortex (2002) 1.32

Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nat Neurosci (2000) 1.03

Effects of stimulus complexity on the perception of brief temporal intervals. J Exp Psychol (1974) 1.01

Big time is not always long: numerical magnitude automatically affects time reproduction. Psychol Sci (2011) 0.92

The subjective size of visual stimuli affects the perceived duration of their presentation. Percept Psychophys (2007) 0.90

A generalized magnitude system for space, time, and quantity? A cautionary note. J Vis (2012) 0.88

Aftereffect of perceived regularity. J Vis (2013) 0.85

Numerical quantity affects time estimation in the suprasecond range. Neurosci Lett (2013) 0.84

Duration judgments over multiple elements. Front Psychol (2012) 0.83

Effect of perceived brightness on perceived time. Percept Mot Skills (1986) 0.83

Time perception: the surprising effects of surprising stimuli. J Exp Psychol Gen (2014) 0.82

Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation. J Vis (2015) 0.80

Duration estimates within a modality are integrated sub-optimally. Front Psychol (2015) 0.80

Pattern randomness aftereffect. Sci Rep (2013) 0.78