Bioresorbable scaffolds versus metallic stents in routine PCI: the plot thickens.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 28932529)

Published in J Thorac Dis on August 01, 2017

Authors

Athanasios Katsikis1, Patrick W Serruys2

Author Affiliations

1: 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Cardiology Department, Athens, Greece.
2: NHLI, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Articles cited by this

Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med (2014) 10.54

Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Stents in Routine PCI. N Engl J Med (2017) 5.42

Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry. EuroIntervention (2015) 4.00

Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation (1996) 3.82

A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ABSORB): 2-year outcomes and results from multiple imaging methods. Lancet (2009) 3.55

Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med (2015) 2.97

Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet (2016) 2.11

Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Thrombosis: Multicenter Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Presentation, Mechanisms, and Predictors. J Am Coll Cardiol (2016) 1.73

A Polylactide Bioresorbable Scaffold Eluting Everolimus for Treatment of Coronary Stenosis: 5-Year Follow-Up. J Am Coll Cardiol (2016) 1.54

Bioresorbable scaffolds: rationale, current status, challenges, and future. Eur Heart J (2013) 1.22

Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol (2017) 0.90

Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial. EuroIntervention (2016) 0.89

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds for Coronary Revascularization. Circulation (2016) 0.85

Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Two-year clinical outcomes of the EVERBIO II trial. Int J Cardiol (2017) 0.81

Dmax for sizing, PSP-1, PSP-2, PSP-3 or OCT guidance: interventionalist's jargon or indispensable implantation techniques for short- and long-term outcomes of Absorb BRS? EuroIntervention (2017) 0.79

Long-term data of BRS presented at EuroPCR 2017 (Friday, 19 May). EuroIntervention (2017) 0.79

Randomised comparison of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold with a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: the 2-year clinical outcomes of the ABSORB II trial. EuroIntervention (2016) 0.78