Importance of time in therapeutic range on bleeding risk prediction using clinical risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 28935868)

Published in Sci Rep on September 21, 2017

Authors

José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca1,2, Vanessa Roldán3, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor4, Mariano Valdés5, Vicente Vicente6, Gregory Y H Lip7, Francisco Marín5

Author Affiliations

1: a Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom.
2: b Department of Hematology and Clinical Oncology , Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca) , Murcia , Spain.
3: Department of Hematology and Clinical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain. vroldans@um.es.
4: 1 Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, CIBER-CV, Murcia, Spain.
5: Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain.
6: Department of Hematology and Clinical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain.
7: Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, and Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Articles cited by this

Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics (1988) 70.41

Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med (2008) 57.29

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med (2011) 28.99

2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J (2012) 12.36

Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making (2006) 11.83

Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med (2007) 10.87

A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost (1993) 7.92

Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost (2005) 5.92

A new risk scheme to predict warfarin-associated hemorrhage: The ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol (2011) 5.06

Factors affecting quality of anticoagulation control among patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin: the SAMe-TT₂R₂ score. Chest (2013) 4.71

Performance of the HEMORR(2)HAGES, ATRIA, and HAS-BLED bleeding risk-prediction scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing anticoagulation: the AMADEUS (evaluating the use of SR34006 compared to warfarin or acenocoumarol in patients with atrial fibrillation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol (2012) 3.49

Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2008) 2.64

Anticoagulation control and prediction of adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2008) 2.61

Risks of stroke and mortality associated with suboptimal anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients. Thromb Haemost (2011) 2.35

The ORBIT bleeding score: a simple bedside score to assess bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J (2015) 2.25

Comparison of outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin therapy according to anticoagulant control: results from SPORTIF III and V. Arch Intern Med (2007) 2.20

Stroke risk and antithrombotic strategies in atrial fibrillation. Stroke (2010) 1.62

The HAS-BLED Score for Predicting Major Bleeding Risk in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol (2015) 1.50

Validation of the SAMe-TT2R2 score in a nationwide population of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients on vitamin K antagonists. Thromb Haemost (2015) 1.49

Vitamin K antagonists in heart disease: current status and perspectives (Section III). Position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis--Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease. Thromb Haemost (2013) 1.36

Predictive value of the HAS-BLED and ATRIA bleeding scores for the risk of serious bleeding in a "real-world" population with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulant therapy. Chest (2013) 1.22

Cessation of oral anticoagulation in relation to mortality and the risk of thrombotic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost (2013) 1.02

Performance of the HEMORR 2 HAGES, ATRIA, and HAS-BLED bleeding risk-prediction scores in nonwarfarin anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients. J Am Coll Cardiol (2012) 1.00

Relation of the HAS-BLED bleeding risk score to major bleeding, cardiovascular events, and mortality in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol (2012) 0.97

Assessing the risk of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation project. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol (2012) 0.93

Patients' time in therapeutic range on warfarin among US patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from ORBIT-AF registry. Am Heart J (2015) 0.88

Bleeding risk prediction models in atrial fibrillation. Curr Cardiol Rep (2014) 0.85

Performance of the HAS-BLED high bleeding-risk category, compared to ATRIA and HEMORR2HAGES in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol (2014) 0.85

Evaluation of the HAS-BLED, ATRIA, and ORBIT Bleeding Risk Scores in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Taking Warfarin. Am J Med (2015) 0.83

Assessing bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation with the HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores: clinical application requires focus on the reversible bleeding risk factors. Eur Heart J (2015) 0.80

Bleeding risk assessment in atrial fibrillation: observations on the use and misuse of bleeding risk scores. J Thromb Haemost (2016) 0.79

Predictive abilities of the HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in non-warfarin anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients: An ancillary analysis from the AMADEUS trial. Int J Cardiol (2016) 0.77

Major Bleeding in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Time in Therapeutic Range on Contemporary Bleeding Risk Scores. Sci Rep (2016) 0.77

Assessing Bleeding Risk With the HAS-BLED Score: Balancing Simplicity, Practicality, and Predictive Value in Bleeding-Risk Assessment. Clin Cardiol (2015) 0.77

Predictive ability of HAS-BLED, HEMORR2HAGES, and ATRIA bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation. A French nationwide cross-sectional study. Int J Cardiol (2016) 0.76

Comparative evaluation of HAS-BLED and ATRIA scores by investigating the full potential of their bleeding prediction schemes in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients on vitamin-K antagonists. Int J Cardiol (2014) 0.76

The importance of excellence in the quality of anticoagulation control whilst taking vitamin K antagonists. Thromb Haemost (2015) 0.75

Assessing bleeding risk in 4824 Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: The Beijing PLA Hospital Atrial Fibrillation Project. Sci Rep (2016) 0.75

The 5-factor ORBIT bleeding score predicted major bleeding at 2 years in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med (2016) 0.75