Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit.

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA (1996) 36.04

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med (2009) 35.37

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 22.34

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA (2001) 19.20

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust (2006) 11.40

The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed. BMJ (2010) 5.58

Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials. BMJ (2010) 4.98

Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet (2014) 4.83

How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Educ Prev (1997) 4.67

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev (2012) 4.36

An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 4.25

Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Lancet (2000) 4.16

The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Control Clin Trials (2002) 3.62

Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) 3.51

Peer-reviewed publication of clinical trials completed for pediatric exclusivity. JAMA (2006) 2.92

External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One (2007) 2.70

Discrepancies and rates of publication in orthopaedic sports medicine abstracts. Am J Sports Med (2008) 2.57

Transition from meeting abstract to full-length journal article for randomized controlled trials. JAMA (2006) 2.53

Abstracts of randomized controlled trials presented at the society for pediatric research meeting: an example of publication bias. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med (2002) 2.15

Agomelatine efficacy and acceptability revisited: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomised trials. Br J Psychiatry (2013) 1.80

Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses. BMJ (2012) 1.58

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol (2015) 1.44

Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals. Trials (2012) 1.42

From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals. FASEB J (2005) 1.39

Out of sight but not out of mind: how to search for unpublished clinical trial evidence. BMJ (2012) 1.28

Efficacy of agomelatine in major depressive disorder: meta-analysis and appraisal. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2011) 1.19

Effectiveness of oseltamivir in adults: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished clinical trials. Fam Pract (2012) 1.15

Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 1.10

Quinine for nocturnal leg cramps: a meta-analysis including unpublished data. J Gen Intern Med (1998) 1.08

Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study. BMJ (2013) 1.07

Severe depression and antidepressants: focus on a pooled analysis of placebo-controlled studies on agomelatine. Int Clin Psychopharmacol (2007) 1.04

Effect of statins on venous thromboembolic events: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished evidence from randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med (2012) 0.99

A benefit-risk assessment of agomelatine in the treatment of major depression. Drug Saf (2011) 0.97

Systematic review: the methodological quality of trials affects estimates of treatment efficacy in functional (non-ulcer) dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2004) 0.95

Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses. BMJ (2017) 0.81

Dependability of results in conference abstracts of randomized controlled trials in ophthalmology and author financial conflicts of interest as a factor associated with full publication. Trials (2016) 0.80

Regulatory agencies hold the key to improving Cochrane reviews of drugs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2015) 0.77