Comparison of predictions based on observational data with the results of randomized controlled clinical trials of coronary artery bypass surgery.

PubWeight™: 2.59‹?› | Rank: Top 1%

🔗 View Article (PMID 3276752)

Published in J Am Coll Cardiol on February 01, 1988

Authors

M A Hlatky1, R M Califf, F E Harrell, K L Lee, D B Mark, D B Pryor

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

Articles citing this

Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ (1996) 17.27

Rationale, development and implementation of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest. Resuscitation (2008) 3.98

Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: true association or artefact? BMJ (1995) 3.12

Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA (2009) 2.17

Long-term survival of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy treated by coronary artery bypass grafting versus medical therapy. Ann Thorac Surg (2012) 1.54

The case for randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2011) 1.42

The rationale for a spine registry. Eur Spine J (2005) 1.23

Comparison of radiation dose and image quality: 320-MDCT versus 64-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2011) 0.99

Mortality and recurrent cardiac events after coronary artery bypass graft: long term outcomes in a population study. Heart (2002) 0.94

Pulmonary venous atrial obstruction after the Senning procedure: relief by catheter balloon dilatation. Br Heart J (1990) 0.92

The effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation. BMC Complement Altern Med (2014) 0.90

The best type of trial. CMAJ (2004) 0.90

Epidemiologic studies of osteoporotic fractures: methodologic issues. Calcif Tissue Int (1991) 0.87

Comparative Effectiveness of First Antiretroviral Regimens in Clinical Practice Using a Causal Approach. Medicine (Baltimore) (2015) 0.82

Using multiple types of studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions--a systematic review. PLoS One (2013) 0.81

"Virtual" clinical trials: case control experiments utilizing a health services research workstation. Proc AMIA Symp (1998) 0.75

Does acupuncture reduce the risk of acute myocardial infarction? Integr Med Res (2016) 0.75

Risks and results of surgery. Br Heart J (1995) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med (1996) 46.18

The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA (1996) 17.62

Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA (1982) 14.05

Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA (1998) 12.60

Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med (2001) 11.56

An amino acid liquid synthetic medium for the development of mycelial and yeast forms of Candida Albicans. Sabouraudia (1975) 11.53

A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med (1999) 10.17

Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol (2001) 10.16

Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med (1993) 8.75

Clinical judgment and statistics. Lessons from a simulated randomized trial in coronary artery disease. Circulation (1980) 7.96

Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med (2011) 7.62

Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med (1984) 7.09

Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. N Engl J Med (1994) 6.78

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. N Engl J Med (1996) 6.68

A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events Study Group. N Engl J Med (1997) 6.19

Cardiac troponin T levels for risk stratification in acute myocardial ischemia. GUSTO IIA Investigators. N Engl J Med (1996) 5.94

Outcomes following acute exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive lung disease. The SUPPORT investigators (Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments) Am J Respir Crit Care Med (1996) 5.82

Racial variation in the use of coronary-revascularization procedures. Are the differences real? Do they matter? N Engl J Med (1997) 5.80

Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med (1993) 5.59

Outcome of acute myocardial infarction according to the specialty of the admitting physician. N Engl J Med (1996) 5.51

A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol (1989) 5.50

Relationship of depression to increased risk of mortality and rehospitalization in patients with congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med (2001) 4.85

Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators. N Engl J Med (1999) 4.53

Risk factors, angiographic patterns, and outcomes in patients with ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-I (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Trial Investigators. Circulation (2000) 4.46

Regional variation across the United States in the management of acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-1 Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries. N Engl J Med (1995) 4.29

American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee). J Am Coll Cardiol (2001) 4.20

Cost effectiveness of early discharge after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (2000) 4.19

Development of an enterprise-wide clinical data repository: merging multiple legacy databases. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp (1997) 4.18

1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol (1999) 4.15

Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial. Circulation (1999) 4.14

Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. J Natl Cancer Inst (1988) 4.07

Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator as compared with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (1995) 3.69

Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med (1991) 3.63

Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators. Circulation (2000) 3.61

ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol (2000) 3.54

Referral patterns for coronary artery disease treatment: gender bias or good clinical judgment? Ann Intern Med (1992) 3.39

The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. N Engl J Med (1994) 3.39

Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for mortality. Psychosom Med (2001) 3.38

Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. GUSTO-I Investigators. Circulation (1995) 3.38

Scorecard cardiovascular medicine. Its impact and future directions. Ann Intern Med (1994) 3.32

Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets. Stat Med (2000) 3.25

Job strain and the prevalence and outcome of coronary artery disease. Circulation (1995) 3.22

ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). J Am Coll Cardiol (1997) 3.14

Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure: results from the SUPPORT project. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Circulation (1998) 3.11

The SUPPORT prognostic model. Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Ann Intern Med (1995) 3.08

Prognostic importance of social and economic resources among medically treated patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. JAMA (1992) 3.06

A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (1987) 3.04

ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina). Circulation (2000) 3.02

Resource use and survival of patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure: differences in care by specialty of the attending physician. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Ann Intern Med (2000) 2.96

Clinical data bases. Accomplishments and unrealized potential. Med Care (1985) 2.83

Determinants of the use of coronary angiography and revascularization after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (1996) 2.83

ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol (1996) 2.81

Difference in countries' use of resources and clinical outcome for patients with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO trial. Lancet (1997) 2.80

Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at risk for sudden death. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med (2000) 2.80

Long-term protection from myocardial ischemic events in a randomized trial of brief integrin beta3 blockade with percutaneous coronary intervention. EPIC Investigator Group. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition for Prevention of Ischemic Complication. JAMA (1997) 2.77

Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems, and suggested solutions. Cancer Treat Rep (1985) 2.76