Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.

PubWeight™: 37.76‹?› | Rank: Top 0.01% | All-Time Top 10000

🔗 View Article (PMID 10584742)

Published in Lancet on November 27, 1999

Authors

D Moher1, D J Cook, S Eastwood, I Olkin, D Rennie, D F Stroup

Author Affiliations

1: University of Ottawa, Thomas C Chalmers Centre for Systematic Reviews, Ontario, Canada. dmoher@uottawa.ca

Articles citing this

(truncated to the top 100)

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med (2009) 65.36

Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med (2005) 41.68

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (2009) 34.99

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (2009) 22.18

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2009) 21.74

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ (2007) 14.52

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med (2007) 11.51

Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiol Rev (2010) 9.25

Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ (2006) 9.04

Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care (2005) 8.53

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med (2007) 8.46

The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ (2006) 8.26

Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000-2006: a systematic review. PLoS Med (2007) 7.94

What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ (2008) 7.33

Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in treatment and prevention of influenza A and B: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2003) 7.03

Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. BMJ (2001) 6.69

EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis (2006) 6.36

Inhaled corticosteroids in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2008) 6.24

Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ (2009) 6.23

Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects. CMAJ (2006) 6.12

Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study. BMJ (2005) 5.65

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol (2001) 5.43

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ (2000) 5.43

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ (2007) 5.38

Probiotics in prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhoea: meta-analysis. BMJ (2002) 5.36

The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2009) 5.14

Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ (2009) 5.11

A meta-analysis of depression during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2010) 5.00

Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (2008) 4.97

A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med (2010) 4.89

REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Br J Cancer (2005) 4.85

Are cannabinoids an effective and safe treatment option in the management of pain? A qualitative systematic review. BMJ (2001) 4.81

Effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med (2010) 4.79

Effect of lowering blood pressure on cardiovascular events and mortality in patients on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet (2009) 4.73

Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2003) 4.69

The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. Qual Saf Health Care (2008) 4.59

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature. Crit Care (2005) 4.51

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med (2009) 4.43

Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study. BMJ (2006) 4.36

Early onset of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant action: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2006) 4.30

Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med (2010) 4.13

Effect of fibre, antispasmodics, and peppermint oil in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (2008) 4.12

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials. JAMA (2009) 4.08

Meta-analysis of drug-related deaths soon after release from prison. Addiction (2010) 3.96

Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2001) 3.90

Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival. Int J Epidemiol (2010) 3.90

Confidence interval or p-value?: part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int (2009) 3.86

Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus infection and disease in women: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ (2007) 3.77

Effect of weight reduction in obese patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis (2007) 3.70

Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 3.68

The effectiveness of exercise as an intervention in the management of depression: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2001) 3.63

Strategies to prevent falls and fractures in hospitals and care homes and effect of cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ (2006) 3.53

Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med (2011) 3.52

Effects of treatments for symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy: systematic review. BMJ (2007) 3.36

Effectiveness of paroxetine in the treatment of acute major depression in adults: a systematic re-examination of published and unpublished data from randomized trials. CMAJ (2008) 3.27

Head-to-head comparisons of metabolic side effects of second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res (2010) 3.26

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut (2004) 3.26

Guidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network's survey of guideline authors. PLoS Med (2008) 3.22

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem-cell compared with bone marrow transplantation in the management of hematologic malignancies: an individual patient data meta-analysis of nine randomized trials. J Clin Oncol (2005) 3.17

Meta-analysis of increased dose of inhaled steroid or addition of salmeterol in symptomatic asthma (MIASMA). BMJ (2000) 3.08

What is the empirical evidence that hospitals with higher-risk adjusted mortality rates provide poorer quality care? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 3.02

Facial emotion perception in schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review. Schizophr Bull (2009) 2.98

Prospective meta-analysis using individual patient data in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med (2009) 2.93

Treatment of obesity in primary care practice in the United States: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med (2009) 2.89

Cancer risk in diabetic patients treated with metformin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One (2012) 2.84

Pregabalin for acute and chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 2.83

Efficacy and safety of Seprafilm for preventing postoperative abdominal adhesion: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg (2007) 2.82

How efficacious and safe is short-acting methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder in children and adolescents? A meta-analysis. CMAJ (2001) 2.74

The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement. PLoS Med (2015) 2.72

Meta-analysis of survival of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer managed with surgical resection versus chemotherapy alone. World J Surg (2010) 2.72

Corticosteroid injections for osteoarthritis of the knee: meta-analysis. BMJ (2004) 2.71

Outcomes with various drug eluting or bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: mixed treatment comparison analysis of 22,844 patient years of follow-up from randomised trials. BMJ (2012) 2.66

Physician awareness of drug cost: a systematic review. PLoS Med (2007) 2.63

Benefits and harms of direct to consumer advertising: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care (2005) 2.61

Effect of treating co-infections on HIV-1 viral load: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis (2010) 2.60

Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr (2012) 2.56

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care (2006) 2.55

Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PLoS One (2012) 2.55

Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients. BMJ (2010) 2.53

Second-generation antipsychotic drugs and extrapyramidal side effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head comparisons. Schizophr Bull (2010) 2.50

The effectiveness of five strategies for the prevention of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review. BMJ (2004) 2.49

Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychol Rev (2006) 2.46

The feasibility of smoking reduction: an update. Addiction (2005) 2.44

Anticholinergics in the treatment of children and adults with acute asthma: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Thorax (2005) 2.41

A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC Med Res Methodol (2004) 2.39

Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc (2004) 2.39

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg (2006) 2.34

A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers. J Med Internet Res (2010) 2.31

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.29

Prevalence of opioid adverse events in chronic non-malignant pain: systematic review of randomised trials of oral opioids. Arthritis Res Ther (2005) 2.28

Does periodontal treatment improve glycemic control in diabetic patients? A meta-analysis of intervention studies. J Dent Res (2005) 2.27

Individual patient data subgroup meta-analysis of surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke (2012) 2.26

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of suicide: a systematic review of observational studies. CMAJ (2009) 2.25

Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia. Hernia (2015) 2.23

Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 2.19

Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. J Med Libr Assoc (2005) 2.17

Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting. BMJ (2006) 2.12

Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be? Am Psychol (2008) 2.10

Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One (2013) 2.05

Are we blind to injuries in the visually impaired? A review of the literature. Inj Prev (2002) 2.05

Articles by these authors

Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA (2000) 55.37

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA (1996) 36.04

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet (1998) 19.31

Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. Stat Med (2000) 11.03

Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (1994) 10.80

Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med (1995) 10.29

Thyroid storm. JAMA (1997) 9.44

The impact of influenza epidemics on mortality: introducing a severity index. Am J Public Health (1997) 7.81

Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (2000) 6.95

Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (1994) 6.27

Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (1993) 6.18

Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA (1998) 5.99

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (2000) 5.91

The incidence, importance, and prophylaxis of acute mountain sickness. Lancet (1976) 5.69

The publication of sponsored symposiums in medical journals. N Engl J Med (1992) 5.67

Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (1995) 5.28

The Brown and Williamson documents. Where do we go from here? JAMA (1995) 5.16

Users' guides to the medical literature. XII. How to use articles about health-related quality of life. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (1997) 5.07

Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med (1996) 4.76

Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA (1998) 4.73

Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators. JAMA (1998) 4.70

Meta-analysis of respiratory rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet (1996) 4.65

Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. Health Technol Assess (1999) 4.45

Practitioners of evidence based care. Not all clinicians need to appraise evidence from scratch but all need some skills. BMJ (2000) 4.41

Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers. JAMA (1995) 4.24

Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA (1994) 4.12

Safety Climate Survey: reliability of results from a multicenter ICU survey. Qual Saf Health Care (2005) 3.95

Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis. JAMA (2000) 3.82

Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Chest (2001) 3.77

Corticosteroid treatment for sepsis: a critical appraisal and meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med (1995) 3.74

The influence of dietary and nondietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure: an updated metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Hypertens (1999) 3.72

Users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA (1993) 3.56

A comparison of dermatologists' and primary care physicians' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol (2001) 3.53

Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (2000) 3.34

A method for timely assessment of influenza-associated mortality in the United States. Epidemiology (1997) 3.31

The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA (1995) 3.28

Disclosure of researcher contributions: a study of original research articles in The Lancet. Ann Intern Med (1999) 3.16

Policies on faculty conflicts of interest at US universities. JAMA (2000) 3.16

Smoke and letters. JAMA (1993) 3.08

A meta-analysis of the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the risk of breast cancer. JAMA (1991) 3.07

Isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in non-HIV infected persons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2000) 3.07

Stigmatization of AIDS patients by physicians. Am J Public Health (1987) 3.03

The Cantekin affair. JAMA (1991) 3.01

Effect of calcium supplementation on pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA (1996) 2.98

Evidence-based disease management. JAMA (1997) 2.85

When should an effective treatment be used? Derivation of the threshold number needed to treat and the minimum event rate for treatment. J Clin Epidemiol (2001) 2.84

Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pressure- and Volume-Limited Ventilation Strategy Group. N Engl J Med (1998) 2.84

Influences on the quality of published drug studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (1996) 2.83

Gastric emptying in normal subjects--a reproducible technique using a single scintillation camera and computer system. Gut (1983) 2.83

The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA (1994) 2.69

The attributable morbidity and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critically ill patient. The Canadian Critical Trials Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (1999) 2.69

Crystalloids vs. colloids in fluid resuscitation: a systematic review. Crit Care Med (1999) 2.67

CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials. JAMA (2001) 2.63

Sponsored symposia on environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA (1994) 2.61

Publication bias and public health policy on environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA (1994) 2.51

Future directions for comprehensive public health surveillance and health information systems in the United States. Am J Epidemiol (1994) 2.49

An index of scientific quality for health reports in the lay press. J Clin Epidemiol (1993) 2.47

The science of public health surveillance. J Public Health Policy (1989) 2.45

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group. Br J Surg (2000) 2.40

Consensus statements. N Engl J Med (1981) 2.39

Editors and owners--stretching reputation too far. JAMA (1999) 2.35

Race and ethnicity in public health surveillance: criteria for the scientific use of social categories. Public Health Rep (1994) 2.32

Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update. Obstet Gynecol (1995) 2.32

Health status, quality of life, and the individual. JAMA (1994) 2.30

Systematic reviews: critical links in the great chain of evidence. Ann Intern Med (1997) 2.29

A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. CMAJ (1997) 2.29

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract. An overview. Chest (1994) 2.28

The rational clinical examination. Does this adult patient have acute meningitis? JAMA (1999) 2.24

Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies. Am J Epidemiol (1997) 2.19

Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing in immunocompetent adults: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (1996) 2.16

Breast cancer: how to mishandle misconduct. JAMA (1994) 2.10

Transferring evidence from research into practice: 1. The role of clinical care research evidence in clinical decisions. ACP J Club (1996) 2.10

Pharmacoeconomic analyses: making them transparent, making them credible. JAMA (2000) 2.08

Effects of dietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA (1996) 2.08

The reporting of race and ethnicity in the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Public Health Rep (1989) 2.08

Maximizing oxygen delivery in critically ill patients: a methodologic appraisal of the evidence. Crit Care Med (1996) 2.02

Patterns of authorship among chairmen of departments of medicine. Acad Med (1993) 2.02

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Radiol (2003) 2.00

Treatment of end-stage renal disease: free but not equal. N Engl J Med (1980) 1.96

Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review. JAMA (1986) 1.95

Effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on mortality in patients admitted with acute respiratory failure: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med (1997) 1.95

The contributions of authors. JAMA (2000) 1.91

Introducing Critical Appraisal to studies of animal models investigating novel therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med (1996) 1.89

Rales, peripheral edema, retinal hemorrhage and acute mountain sickness. Am J Med (1979) 1.89

Will mountains trekkers have heart attacks? JAMA (1989) 1.88

Prevalence of asthma, rhinitis and eczema among children in 2 Canadian cities: the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood. CMAJ (1999) 1.84

Users' guides to the medical literature: XIX. Applying clinical trial results. A. How to use an article measuring the effect of an intervention on surrogate end points. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA (1999) 1.84

Interobserver variation in interpreting chest radiographs for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2000) 1.81

Impact of a clinical pharmacist in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit. Crit Care Med (1994) 1.81

The clinical utility of invasive diagnostic techniques in the setting of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Chest (1999) 1.80

The randomized controlled trial gets a middle-aged checkup. JAMA (1998) 1.77