Published in Health Res Policy Syst on December 05, 2006
Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2008) 5.28
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 3.31
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci (2010) 3.25
How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking? PLoS Med (2009) 3.18
Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES). BMC Med Res Methodol (2011) 2.41
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.24
Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ (2013) 1.86
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.86
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptation. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.66
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 16. Evaluation. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.60
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.54
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 14. Reporting guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.51
Differences among international pharyngitis guidelines: not just academic. Ann Fam Med (2007) 1.49
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 17: Dealing with insufficient research evidence. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.37
Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med (2015) 1.17
Quality of reviews on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr (2011) 1.13
Evidence-informed health policy 4 - case descriptions of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci (2008) 1.07
A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011. PLoS One (2012) 1.06
Evaluation of an integrated system for classification, assessment and comparison of services for long-term care in Europe: the eDESDE-LTC study. BMC Health Serv Res (2013) 0.95
Do guidelines influence the implementation of health programs?--Uganda's experience. Implement Sci (2012) 0.91
Uptake of evidence in policy development: the case of user fees for health care in public health facilities in Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res (2014) 0.90
An iterative evaluation of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians: a focus group study. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2014) 0.82
The methodological quality of systematic reviews comparing temporomandibular joint disorder surgical and non-surgical treatment. BMC Oral Health (2008) 0.81
Counselling, case management and health promotion for people living with HIV/AIDS: an overview of systematic reviews. AIDS Behav (2013) 0.80
Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies. Implement Sci (2016) 0.79
An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Danhong Injection for Ischemic Stroke. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med (2016) 0.77
Treatment, care and support for people co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C: a scoping review. Open Med (2009) 0.75
Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews. Syst Rev (2017) 0.75
Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation. J Bone Oncol (2012) 0.75
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA (2000) 55.37
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet (1999) 37.76
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy (2005) 12.22
Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care (2003) 12.01
Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess (1998) 11.56
Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med (2001) 7.94
Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ (1994) 7.90
Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services--methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med (2000) 6.43
Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med (1994) 5.72
Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? JAMA (2001) 5.01
How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess (2003) 4.62
Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med (2003) 4.15
Meta-analysis: an update. Mt Sinai J Med (1996) 4.06
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 3.31
Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care (2003) 3.27
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.93
How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of health care interventions? ACP J Club (2003) 2.81
Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2003) 2.75
'Quick and clean': authoritative health technology assessment for local health care contracting. Health Trends (1995) 1.89
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.87
Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go? J Epidemiol Community Health (2005) 1.81
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80
Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess (2003) 1.68
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.67
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.66
Use of systematic reviews in the development of new provincial public health policies in Ontario. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2004) 1.60
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 14. Reporting guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.51
The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2000) 1.51
Expert searching in public health. J Med Libr Assoc (2005) 1.49
Evidence-based public health: what does it offer developing countries? J Public Health (Oxf) (2005) 1.46
Assessing the need to update prevention guidelines: a comparison of two methods. Int J Qual Health Care (2004) 1.46
Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informative. J Clin Epidemiol (2006) 1.44
Information retrieval in systematic reviews: challenges in the public health arena. Am J Prev Med (2000) 1.37
A proposed architecture and method of operation for improving the protection of privacy and confidentiality in disease registers. BMC Med Res Methodol (2003) 1.32
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 11. Incorporating considerations of cost-effectiveness, affordability and resource implications. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.28
Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated? BMC Med Res Methodol (2005) 1.26
Keeping cancer guidelines current: results of a comprehensive prospective literature monitoring strategy for twenty clinical practice guidelines. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2003) 1.24
Identifying null meta-analyses that are ripe for updating. BMC Med Res Methodol (2003) 1.19
Is evidence-based medicine relevant to the developing world?: Systematic reviews have yet to achieve their potential as a resource for practitioners in developing countries. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med (2005) 1.19
Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them. Am J Manag Care (2004) 0.94
HTA responses and the classic HTA report. J Public Health Med (2003) 0.91
Review article: critical review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials in hepatogastroenterology. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (1997) 0.90
[Rapid assessments"--quick evaluation of medical technology]. Gesundheitswesen (2001) 0.86
Training practitioners in preparing systematic reviews: a cross-sectional survey of participants in the Australasian Cochrane Centre training program. BMC Health Serv Res (2002) 0.83
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2011) 22.39
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 11.77
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 10.02
Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA (2005) 8.43
Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ (2008) 7.30
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ (2008) 6.99
Use of evidence in WHO recommendations. Lancet (2007) 6.12
An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline: Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Update of the 2011 Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2015) 6.03
Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines: 2010 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2010) 5.80
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 5.78
Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med (2007) 5.63
Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2002) 5.57
An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2006) 5.29
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 5.10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. CMAJ (2002) 4.84
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2005) 4.34
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.93
The OFF theory of research utilization. J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 3.79
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 3.60
GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 3.58
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.54
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14: Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.45
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.44
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.34
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking? Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.32
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 3.31
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.30
Validity of composite end points in clinical trials. BMJ (2005) 3.26
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2007) 3.06
Antivirals for treatment of influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Intern Med (2012) 3.05
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.02
The safety of long-acting beta-agonists among patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2008) 3.01
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.93
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.83
Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2004) 2.76
An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. J Clin Epidemiol (2004) 2.58
Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports. BMJ (2004) 2.55
The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 2.55
Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries . Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 2.49
GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 2.46
Mortality predictions in the intensive care unit: comparing physicians with scoring systems. Crit Care Med (2006) 2.29
Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol (2008) 2.28
How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. JAMA (2012) 2.28
Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci (2013) 2.25
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.24
Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit. J Clin Epidemiol (2007) 2.20
Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res (2012) 2.16
Low intensity pulsed ultrasonography for fractures: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2009) 2.15
Integrating mortality and morbidity outcomes: using quality-adjusted life years in critical care trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2012) 2.15
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 4: Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.15
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.15
The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2008) 2.07
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.05
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 10: Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.03
SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 11: Finding and using evidence about local conditions. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.00
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 7: Finding systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.99
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ (2008) 1.94
Barriers and facilitators to patients' adherence to antiretroviral treatment in Zambia: a qualitative study. SAHARA J (2008) 1.90
GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.90
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.87
Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ (2013) 1.86
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.86
Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review. BMJ (2012) 1.85
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 3: Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.84
Relation between lung function and RBC distribution width in a population-based study. Chest (2003) 1.83
Fasting glucose is a risk factor for breast cancer: a prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2002) 1.83
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 5: Using research evidence to frame options to address a problem. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.82
Executive summary: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest (2008) 1.81
Factors influencing the utilization of research findings by health policy-makers in a developing country: the selection of Mali's essential medicines. Health Res Policy Syst (2007) 1.81
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptation. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80
Systems medicine and integrated care to combat chronic noncommunicable diseases. Genome Med (2011) 1.78
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.75
Quality of professional society guidelines and consensus conference statements in critical care. Crit Care Med (2008) 1.74
Pulmonary function and abdominal adiposity in the general population. Chest (2006) 1.74
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.67
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.66
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 16. Evaluation. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.60
Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest. Implement Sci (2012) 1.59
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 15. Disseminating and implementing guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.57
Can paying for results help to achieve the Millennium Development Goals? Overview of the effectiveness of results-based financing. J Evid Based Med (2009) 1.56
Role of supplemental calcium in the recurrence of colorectal adenomas: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol (2005) 1.55
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.54
A case for clarity, consistency, and helpfulness: state-of-the-art clinical practice guidelines in endocrinology using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2008) 1.53
Low-molecular-weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med (2008) 1.51
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 14. Reporting guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.51
Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty. J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 1.49