Published in CA Cancer J Clin on June 17, 2003
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society. JAMA (2015) 6.38
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2007, featuring tumors of the brain and other nervous system. J Natl Cancer Inst (2011) 5.09
Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med (2009) 4.60
Screening for breast cancer. JAMA (2005) 4.56
Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 2.85
A comparison of two Native American Navigator formats: face-to-face and telephone. Cancer Control (2005) 2.03
The knowledge and attitudes of breast self-examination and mammography in a group of women in a rural area in western Turkey. BMC Cancer (2006) 2.00
Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review. BMC Cancer (2009) 1.89
Advances in breast cancer: pathways to personalized medicine. Clin Cancer Res (2008) 1.59
Impact of U.S. citizenship status on cancer screening among immigrant women. J Gen Intern Med (2005) 1.55
Decision making and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older. J Gen Intern Med (2006) 1.45
Using a summary measure for multiple quality indicators in primary care: the Summary QUality InDex (SQUID). Implement Sci (2007) 1.38
Behavioral constructs and mammography in five ethnic groups. Health Educ Behav (2009) 1.33
The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population. Med Care (2004) 1.26
Standard definitions of adherence for infrequent yet repeated health behaviors. Am J Health Behav (2010) 1.25
Spatial equity in facilities providing low- or no-fee screening mammography in Chicago neighborhoods. J Urban Health (2006) 1.22
Sources of health information related to preventive health behaviors in a national study. Am J Prev Med (2010) 1.22
Oligogenic combinations associated with breast cancer risk in women under 53 years of age. Hum Genet (2004) 1.21
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding breast cancer and screening in female teachers of buraidah, saudi arabia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) (2007) 1.18
Impact of cognitive impairment on screening mammography use in older US women. Am J Public Health (2010) 1.15
Development of a Bayesian classifier for breast cancer risk stratification: a feasibility study. Eplasty (2010) 1.14
Cancer screening practices among physicians in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2011) 1.11
Finding the minimal intervention needed for sustained mammography adherence. Am J Prev Med (2010) 1.09
Heterogeneity within the Asian American community. Int J Equity Health (2003) 1.09
The Effect of Budgetary Restrictions on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Decisions. Manuf Serv Oper Manag (2012) 1.08
Impact of mailed and automated telephone reminders on receipt of repeat mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med (2009) 1.08
Automated image interpretation computer-assisted diagnostics. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) (2011) 1.07
Prediction of breast self-examination in a sample of Iranian women: an application of the Health Belief Model. BMC Womens Health (2009) 1.07
Epigenetics and epigenetic alterations in pancreatic cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2008) 1.05
Longitudinal predictors of nonadherence to maintenance of mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2010) 1.01
Age of onset in familial cancer. Ann Oncol (2008) 1.00
Current approaches and challenges in early detection of breast cancer recurrence. J Cancer (2014) 1.00
Perceived risk of breast cancer among Latinas attending community clinics: risk comprehension and relationship with mammography adherence. Cancer Causes Control (2008) 0.99
Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s. Cancer Epidemiol (2009) 0.99
The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey. J Gen Intern Med (2005) 0.98
Access to Mammography Facilities and Detection of Breast Cancer by Screening Mammography: A GIS Approach. Int J Canc Prev (2009) 0.97
HIV women's health: a study of gynecological healthcare service utilization in a U.S. urban clinic population. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2008) 0.97
Supplementary screening sonography in mammographically dense breast: pros and cons. Korean J Radiol (2010) 0.97
Effect of Patient Navigation on Breast Cancer Screening Among African American Medicare Beneficiaries: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med (2015) 0.96
Current knowledge, attitudes and practices of women on breast cancer and mammography at Mulago Hospital. Pan Afr Med J (2010) 0.96
The role of physician involvement in Latinas' mammography screening adherence. Womens Health Issues (2011) 0.96
Intentions to maintain adherence to mammography. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2008) 0.94
Perceived risk for breast cancer and its relationship to mammography in Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites. J Behav Med (2012) 0.94
Risk-reducing strategies for women carrying BRCA1/2 mutations with a focus on prophylactic surgery. BMC Womens Health (2010) 0.94
Attitudes of midwifery students towards teaching breast-self examination. Radiol Oncol (2010) 0.93
Alterations in human breast cancer adhesion-motility in response to changes in cell surface glycoproteins displaying alpha-L-fucose moieties. Int J Oncol (2008) 0.92
Physician gender differences in general and cancer-specific prevention attitudes and practices. J Cancer Educ (2009) 0.91
Actualizing Personalized Healthcare for Women through Connected Data Systems: Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Glob Adv Health Med (2013) 0.90
Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for integrating MRI into breast cancer screening for women at high risk. Br J Cancer (2014) 0.90
Effects of personal characteristics on African-American women's beliefs about breast cancer. Am J Health Promot (2010) 0.90
Should women 40 to 49 years of age be offered mammographic screening? Can Fam Physician (2006) 0.89
Race and family history assessment for breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med (2005) 0.87
American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin (2015) 0.86
Development of an electronic breast pathology database in a community health system. J Pathol Inform (2014) 0.84
Age of onset in familial breast cancer as background data for medical surveillance. Br J Cancer (2009) 0.84
Sexual orientation and intentions to obtain breast cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2009) 0.84
Imaging features of sporadic breast cancer in women under 40 years old: 97 cases. Eur Radiol (2013) 0.84
Methodological quality of English-language genetic guidelines on hereditary breast-cancer screening and management: an evaluation using the AGREE instrument. BMC Med (2012) 0.84
The association between the pre-diagnosis mammography screening interval and advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2006) 0.83
Does gender discrimination impact regular mammography screening? Findings from the race differences in screening mammography study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2008) 0.83
Then and now: comparison of baseline breast cancer screening rates at 2 time intervals. J Cancer Educ (2009) 0.82
How do nurses and teachers perform breast self-examination: are they reliable sources of information? BMC Public Health (2007) 0.82
Uncovering an Existential Barrier to Breast Self-exam Behavior. J Exp Soc Psychol (2008) 0.82
Can breast self-examination continue to be touted justifiably as an optional practice? Int J Surg Oncol (2011) 0.81
Towards non-invasive characterization of breast cancer and cancer metabolism with diffuse optics. PET Clin (2013) 0.81
Prospective screening study of 0.5 Tesla dedicated magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in young, high-risk women. BMC Womens Health (2006) 0.80
Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference? Health Expect (2008) 0.80
Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. Patient Educ Couns (2010) 0.80
Use of annual mammography among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Gen Intern Med (2011) 0.79
Breast cancer preoperative staging: does contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography modify surgery? Int J Breast Cancer (2011) 0.79
Breast cancer screening: a final analysis? CA Cancer J Clin (2003) 0.79
Association of race and breast cancer stage. J Natl Med Assoc (2006) 0.79
Artificial neural networks in mammography interpretation and diagnostic decision making. Comput Math Methods Med (2013) 0.79
Mammography screening in less developed countries. Springerplus (2015) 0.78
Breast imaging fellowships in the United States: who, what, and where? AJR Am J Roentgenol (2009) 0.78
Should women under 50 be screened for breast cancer? Br J Cancer (2004) 0.78
Breast cancer detection among young survivors of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma with screening magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer (2014) 0.78
Management of the asymptomatic BRCA mutation carrier. Appl Clin Genet (2010) 0.78
Monocyte-derived macrophage assisted breast cancer cell invasion as a personalized, predictive metric to score metastatic risk. Sci Rep (2015) 0.78
Developing and testing a decision aid for use by providers in making recommendations: about mammography screening in older women. J Appl Gerontol (2012) 0.77
Specificity of clinical breast examination in community practice. J Gen Intern Med (2007) 0.77
A brief intervention designed to increase breast cancer self-screening. Am J Health Promot (2009) 0.77
At what age should screening mammography be recommended for Asian women? Cancer Med (2015) 0.77
Performance of breast cancer screening methods and modality among Chinese women: a report from a society-based breast screening program (SBSP) in Shanghai. Springerplus (2013) 0.77
99mTc-thymine scintigraphy may be a promising method in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Clinics (Sao Paulo) (2013) 0.77
Consensus recommendations for advancing breast cancer: risk identification and screening in ethnically diverse younger women. J Cancer (2011) 0.77
Insufficient Knowledge of Breast Cancer Risk Factors Among Malaysian Female University Students. Glob J Health Sci (2015) 0.77
Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res (2015) 0.77
Construct validity of a mammography processes of change scale and invariance by stage of change. J Health Psychol (2010) 0.77
Trends and variations in breast and colorectal cancer incidence from 1995 to 2011: a comparative study between Texas Cancer Registry and National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data. Int J Oncol (2015) 0.77
Managing breast cancer in younger women: challenges and solutions. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) (2015) 0.76
Breast cancer: Updated screening guidelines - much ado about small improvements. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2015) 0.76
Association between TCF7L2 polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med (2015) 0.76
Preliminary effectiveness of breast cancer screening among 1.22 million Chinese females and different cancer patterns between urban and rural women. Sci Rep (2016) 0.75
Estimating development cost of an interactive website based cancer screening promotion program. Eval Program Plann (2015) 0.75
Social network effects of nonlifesaving early-stage breast cancer detection on mammography rates. Am J Public Health (2014) 0.75
Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc (2010) 0.75
Breast cancer screening at the Breast Examination Center of Harlem. Ann Surg Oncol (2014) 0.75
Mammography Adherence in African-American Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Behav Med (2016) 0.75
A novel method to assess incompleteness of mammography reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2014) 0.75
International network of cancer genome projects. Nature (2010) 20.35
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med (2005) 14.47
American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin (2007) 12.19
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA (2008) 10.92
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2009, featuring the burden and trends in human papillomavirus(HPV)-associated cancers and HPV vaccination coverage levels. J Natl Cancer Inst (2013) 8.75
Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet (2010) 6.74
American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin (2002) 5.56
An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons. JAMA (2008) 5.25
Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: a systematic review. JAMA (2006) 4.87
Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin (2010) 4.76
Offering individual genetic research results: context matters. Sci Transl Med (2010) 4.51
Cancer screening in the United States, 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. CA Cancer J Clin (2007) 4.09
Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes. Am J Hum Genet (2013) 4.06
Interim guidance for the use of human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening. Obstet Gynecol (2004) 3.67
Reconsidering the family history in primary care. J Gen Intern Med (2004) 3.50
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin (2006) 3.46
Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants. Genet Med (2010) 3.45
National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference: role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med (2012) 3.44
Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. Genet Med (2012) 3.29
Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2010) 3.29
Potential for genetics to promote public health: genetics research on smoking suggests caution about expectations. JAMA (2006) 3.20
ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States. Obstet Gynecol (2007) 3.19
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin (2002) 2.94
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin (2003) 2.91
Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol (2010) 2.89
Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: an American Cancer Society guide for informed choices. CA Cancer J Clin (2003) 2.77
Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin (2011) 2.76
Newborn screening technology: proceed with caution. Pediatrics (2006) 2.54
Science and regulation. Regulating direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Science (2010) 2.40
A formal risk-benefit framework for genomic tests: facilitating the appropriate translation of genomics into clinical practice. Genet Med (2010) 2.40
The genomic applications in practice and prevention network. Genet Med (2009) 2.39
American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin (2005) 2.35
Pharmacogenetic testing: not as simple as it seems. Genet Med (2008) 2.18
History of the Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) (2003) 2.15
Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology (2010) 2.13
Genomic profiling to promote a healthy lifestyle: not ready for prime time. Nat Genet (2003) 2.11
The FDA and genomic tests--getting regulation right. N Engl J Med (2015) 2.09
Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Genet Med (2013) 2.08
Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin (2015) 1.97
Cancer screening in the United States, 2014: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin (2014) 1.95
Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready? Nat Rev Genet (2012) 1.95
The OHRP and SUPPORT. N Engl J Med (2013) 1.78
Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin (2013) 1.75
Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. J Low Genit Tract Dis (2015) 1.73
Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 1.68
Design, implementation, and first-year outcomes of a value-based drug formulary. J Manag Care Spec Pharm (2015) 1.67
CDC-funded intervention research aimed at promoting colorectal cancer screening in communities. Cancer (2006) 1.57
Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2010) 1.55
Differential use of available genetic tests among primary care physicians in the United States: results of a national survey. Genet Med (2008) 1.51
Clinical decisions. Screening an asymptomatic person for genetic risk. N Engl J Med (2014) 1.51
Lobular neoplasia at percutaneous breast biopsy: variables associated with carcinoma at surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2008) 1.50
Informed Consent in Genome-Scale Research: What Do Prospective Participants Think? AJOB Prim Res (2012) 1.50
Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium. Genet Med (2010) 1.47
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: association with lobular breast cancer. Fam Cancer (2008) 1.45
Genetic counseling and testing for Alzheimer disease: joint practice guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Genet Med (2011) 1.44
ACS guideline for the early detection of cervical cancer. Am Fam Physician (2003) 1.39
Current priorities for public health practice in addressing the role of human genomics in improving population health. Am J Prev Med (2011) 1.36
Taking family history seriously. Ann Intern Med (2005) 1.36
Conflicts of interest: recognition, disclosure, and management. J Am Coll Surg (2003) 1.30
Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. Obstet Gynecol (2015) 1.30
Diverse perceptions of the informed consent process: implications for the recruitment and participation of diverse communities in the National Children's Study. Am J Community Psychol (2012) 1.28
Trends in death associated with pediatric dental sedation and general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth (2013) 1.28
Gene expression profiling and breast cancer care: what are the potential benefits and policy implications? Genet Med (2005) 1.27
Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: a review of the literature. CA Cancer J Clin (2004) 1.26
Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 1.20
Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research. Am J Med Genet A (2004) 1.20
The epidemiology of cervical cancer. Cancer J (2003) 1.20
Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges. Genet Med (2012) 1.19
An economic viewpoint on alternative strategies for identifying persons with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Genet Med (2003) 1.18
Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT). Genet Med (2013) 1.16
Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet (2014) 1.16
NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer. NIH Consens State Sci Statements (2013) 1.14
A midpoint assessment of the American Cancer Society challenge goal to decrease cancer incidence by 25% between 1992 and 2015. CA Cancer J Clin (2007) 1.12
Managing incidental genomic findings: legal obligations of clinicians. Genet Med (2013) 1.11
Pharmacogenomic testing to prevent aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss in cystic fibrosis patients: potential impact on clinical, patient, and economic outcomes. Genet Med (2007) 1.11
Educational needs in genetic medicine: primary care perspectives. Community Genet (2008) 1.09
Waiving informed consent in newborn screening research: balancing social value and respect. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet (2008) 1.08
Effectiveness of telephone counseling for mammography: results from five randomized trials. Prev Med (2002) 1.08
Breast cancer risk counseling improves women's functioning. Patient Educ Couns (2004) 1.06
Health literacy and cancer prevention: two new instruments to assess comprehension. Patient Educ Couns (2012) 1.06
Will genomics widen or help heal the schism between medicine and public health? Am J Prev Med (2007) 1.06
Anticipating dissemination of cancer genomics in public health: a theoretical approach to psychosocial and behavioral challenges. Ann Behav Med (2007) 1.05
Genetics researchers' and IRB professionals' attitudes toward genetic research review: a comparative analysis. Genet Med (2012) 1.05
Age-specific trends in black-white disparities in cervical cancer incidence in the United States: 1975-2009. Gynecol Oncol (2012) 1.05
American cancer society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. J Low Genit Tract Dis (2003) 1.04
Does genomic risk information motivate people to change their behavior? Genome Med (2009) 1.03
The association between health literacy and cancer-related attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge. J Health Commun (2013) 1.03
Association of insurance status and age with cervical cancer stage at diagnosis: National Cancer Database, 2000-2007. Am J Public Health (2012) 1.02
The Cancer Message Literacy Tests: psychometric analyses and validity studies. Patient Educ Couns (2012) 1.00
Implementing a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) system to increase colorectal cancer screening: a process evaluation. Patient Educ Couns (2005) 0.99
Stakeholder perspectives on a risk-benefit framework for genetic testing. Public Health Genomics (2010) 0.98
Predictors of recruited melanoma families into a behavioral intervention project. Contemp Clin Trials (2011) 0.98
Primary-care physicians' access to genetic specialists: an impediment to the routine use of genomic medicine? Genet Med (2013) 0.97
From leaky pipeline to irrigation system: minority education through the lens of community-based participatory research. Prog Community Health Partnersh (2012) 0.97
Genetic exceptionalism. Too much of a good thing? Genet Med (2008) 0.97
Family history assessment to detect increased risk for colorectal cancer: conceptual considerations and a preliminary economic analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2005) 0.97
Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont, 1975-1999. Cancer (2002) 0.96