Estimating development cost of an interactive website based cancer screening promotion program.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 25749548)

Published in Eval Program Plann on February 23, 2015

Authors

David R Lairson1, Tong Han Chung2, Lisa G Smith3, Jeffrey K Springston4, Victoria L Champion5

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1200 Herman Pressler Street, RAS E307, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: david.r.lairson@uth.tmc.edu.
2: Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1200 Herman Pressler Street, RAS E331, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
3: Department of Physiology and Health Science, Ball State University, CL 326F, Muncie, IN 47306, United States.
4: College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Georgia, Journalism Building, Room 201-B, Athens, GA 30602, United States.
5: School of Nursing, Indiana University, 1111 Middle Drive NU340, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.

Articles cited by this

Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin (2014) 72.81

Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med (2009) 21.55

Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med (2008) 16.82

Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin (2008) 12.90

Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies. Value Health (2003) 6.02

Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA (2000) 5.88

American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin (2003) 4.43

A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med (2009) 3.48

How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med (1999) 3.10

NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2009) 2.78

Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med (2009) 2.65

Using value of information analysis to prioritise health research: some lessons from recent UK experience. Pharmacoeconomics (2006) 2.59

Multiple health behavior change research: an introduction and overview. Prev Med (2008) 2.46

Microcosting quantity data collection methods. Med Care (2009) 2.33

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Epidemiol Rev (2011) 2.24

NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2010) 2.13

Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods for diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabetes Care (1992) 1.86

Meta-analytic examination of the strong and weak principles across 48 health behaviors. Prev Med (2007) 1.85

Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med (2007) 1.83

Applying health behavior theory to multiple behavior change: considerations and approaches. Prev Med (2007) 1.63

Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Prev Med (1998) 1.57

Pilot trial of a computerized decision aid for breast cancer prevention. Breast J (2007) 1.53

Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population. Am J Prev Med (2011) 1.51

Good research practices for measuring drug costs in cost-effectiveness analyses: a societal perspective: the ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force report--Part II. Value Health (2009) 1.43

Costing behavioral interventions: a practical guide to enhance translation. Ann Behav Med (2009) 1.41

Associations in breast and colon cancer screening behavior in women. Acad Radiol (2005) 1.32

Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Health Educ Behav (2002) 1.19

The effect of a stage-matched and tailored intervention on repeat mammography(1). Am J Prev Med (2002) 1.16

Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: effects on duration and content of counseling sessions. Genet Med (2005) 1.13

Examining the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening promotion. Cancer (2004) 1.07

Cost of starting colorectal cancer screening programs: results from five federally funded demonstration programs. Prev Chronic Dis (2008) 1.05

Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to increase cancer screening in primary care settings. Prev Med (2004) 0.95

Results of Mujeres Felices por ser Saludables: a dietary/breast health randomized clinical trial for Latino women. Ann Behav Med (2004) 0.91

Estimating development cost for a tailored interactive computer program to enhance colorectal cancer screening compliance. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2006) 0.89