Published in BMC Health Serv Res on January 21, 2005
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting. BMC Health Serv Res (2009) 1.82
Improving district level health planning and priority setting in Tanzania through implementing accountability for reasonableness framework: Perceptions of stakeholders. BMC Health Serv Res (2010) 1.21
Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation. Implement Sci (2011) 1.18
Setting healthcare priorities in hospitals: a review of empirical studies. Health Policy Plan (2014) 0.93
The accountability for reasonableness approach to guide priority setting in health systems within limited resources--findings from action research at district level in Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia. Health Res Policy Syst (2014) 0.86
Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation. Int J Health Policy Manag (2015) 0.86
Fairness and legitimacy of decisions during delivery of malaria services and ITN interventions in Zambia. Malar J (2010) 0.83
Patients' priorities for ambulatory hospital care centres. A survey and discrete choice experiment among elderly and chronically ill patients of a Dutch hospital. Health Expect (2009) 0.80
Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos Public Aff (1997) 7.46
Health care rationing: the public's debate. BMJ (1996) 6.89
The ethics of accountability in managed care reform. Health Aff (Millwood) (1998) 5.22
Cost-effectiveness analysis in a setting of budget constraints--is it equitable? N Engl J Med (1996) 4.13
Priority-setting decisions for new cancer drugs: a qualitative case study. Lancet (2001) 3.45
Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study. BMJ (2000) 3.03
Rationing and the health authority. BMJ (1998) 2.34
Bioethics for clinicians: 13. Resource allocation. CMAJ (1997) 2.20
Referral for dialysis in Ontario. Arch Intern Med (1996) 2.13
Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience. Health Policy (1997) 2.10
Priority setting in a hospital critical care unit: qualitative case study. Crit Care Med (2003) 2.01
Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: a survey of key decision makers. Health Policy (2002) 1.83
Priority-setting and hospital strategic planning: a qualitative case study. J Health Serv Res Policy (2003) 1.77
Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers. Health Policy (2002) 1.55
Priority setting in surgery: improve the process and share the learning. World J Surg (2003) 1.04
Technology acquisition in Canadian hospitals: how is it done, and where is the information coming from? Healthc Manage Forum (1994) 1.00
Public attitudes about the use of chronological age as a criterion for allocating health care resources. Gerontologist (1993) 0.98
Rationing of hospital services in the Australian health system. Croat Med J (1998) 0.86
Ethics of resource allocation: dimensions for healthcare executives. Hosp Q (1998) 0.85
Limiting access to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in five European countries: what can we learn about implicit rationing? Health Policy (2000) 0.79
Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature (2011) 8.40
Top ten biotechnologies for improving health in developing countries. Nat Genet (2002) 8.12
Grand challenges in chronic non-communicable diseases. Nature (2007) 7.86
Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Med (2007) 4.75
Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr Pract (2012) 4.11
CPR for patients labeled DNR: the role of the limited aggressive therapy order. Ann Intern Med (2003) 3.54
Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Thyroid (2012) 2.85
Subclinical thyroid dysfunction: a joint statement on management from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Thyroid Association, and the Endocrine Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2005) 2.79
Brazilian health biotech--fostering crosstalk between public and private sectors. Nat Biotechnol (2008) 2.57
India's health biotech sector at a crossroads. Nat Biotechnol (2007) 2.53
Quality care at the end of life. BMJ (2002) 2.40
Public engagement in setting priorities in health care. CMAJ (2008) 2.37
Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 2.06
Priority setting in a hospital critical care unit: qualitative case study. Crit Care Med (2003) 2.01
Chinese health biotech and the billion-patient market. Nat Biotechnol (2008) 2.00
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting. BMC Health Serv Res (2009) 1.82
Global health. Stagnant health technologies in Africa. Science (2010) 1.68
Grand challenges in global health: engaging civil society organizations in biomedical research in developing countries. PLoS Med (2007) 1.68
Nanotechnology and the developing world. PLoS Med (2005) 1.66
Small but tenacious: South Africa's health biotech sector. Nat Biotechnol (2009) 1.63
Priority setting in hospitals: fairness, inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences. Soc Sci Med (2005) 1.62
Accountable priority setting for trust in health systems--the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable health action in developing countries. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.61
Subclinical thyroid dysfunction: a joint statement on management from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Thyroid Association, and the Endocrine Society. Endocr Pract (2005) 1.60
Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers. Health Policy (2002) 1.55
A strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries. Health Care Anal (2007) 1.53
Grand challenges in global health: ethical, social, and cultural issues based on key informant perspectives. PLoS Med (2007) 1.50
Intensive care nurses' and physicians' experiences with demands for treatment: some implications for clinical practice. J Crit Care (2003) 1.48
Global health challenges: the need for an expanded discourse on bioethics. PLoS Med (2005) 1.46
The three main monotheistic religions and gm food technology: an overview of perspectives. BMC Int Health Hum Rights (2009) 1.45
Patients' views about cardiac report cards: a qualitative study. Can J Cardiol (2005) 1.44
Innovative health service delivery models in low and middle income countries - what can we learn from the private sector? Health Res Policy Syst (2010) 1.44
Ethical issues related to cardiac report cards. Can J Cardiol (2004) 1.42
Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making? Soc Sci Med (2008) 1.40
Responsibilities in international research: a new look revisited. J Med Ethics (2010) 1.39
Conclusions: promoting biotechnology innovation in developing countries. Nat Biotechnol (2004) 1.38
Priority setting at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda. Health Policy (2006) 1.35
South Africa--blazing a trail for African biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol (2004) 1.34
SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 1.33
Priority setting in developing countries health care institutions: the case of a Ugandan hospital. BMC Health Serv Res (2006) 1.32
Participation in health care priority-setting through the eyes of the participants. J Health Serv Res Policy (2002) 1.30
Science community: scientific diasporas. Science (2006) 1.29
What do district health planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for reasonableness'? BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 1.28
Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study. Health Policy (2006) 1.28
Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res (2010) 1.27
Pharmacogenetics and geographical ancestry: implications for drug development and global health. Nat Rev Genet (2005) 1.24
The effect of priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs on medical oncologists' practice in Ontario: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 1.23
Responding to trust: surgeons' perspective on informed consent. World J Surg (2009) 1.20
Harnessing stem cells for health needs in India. Cell Stem Cell (2008) 1.19
Biotechnology and the UN's Millennium Development Goals. Nat Biotechnol (2003) 1.19
A business plan to help the 'global South' in its fight against neglected diseases. Health Aff (Millwood) (2009) 1.19
'Relief of oppression': an organizing principle for researchers' obligations to participants in observational studies in the developing world. BMC Public Health (2010) 1.19
Successful priority setting in low and middle income countries: a framework for evaluation. Health Care Anal (2009) 1.18
Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Health Policy (2004) 1.18
Evidence, economics and ethics: resource allocation in health services organizations. Healthc Q (2005) 1.17
Top 10 health care ethics challenges facing the public: views of Toronto bioethicists. BMC Med Ethics (2005) 1.13
Regenerative medicine in Brazil: small but innovative. Regen Med (2010) 1.12
Genomics--a global public good? Lancet (2003) 1.11
Shared principles of ethics for infant and young child nutrition in the developing world. BMC Public Health (2010) 1.11
The Indian and Chinese health biotechnology industries: potential champions of global health? Health Aff (Millwood) (2008) 1.11
Leadership and priority setting: the perspective of hospital CEOs. Health Policy (2005) 1.10
Introduction: promoting global health through biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol (2004) 1.10
A visual dashboard for moving health technologies from "lab to village". J Med Internet Res (2007) 1.10
Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: a transdisciplinary study. BMC Health Serv Res (2002) 1.08
How can developing countries harness biotechnology to improve health? BMC Public Health (2007) 1.06
Cuba--innovation through synergy. Nat Biotechnol (2004) 1.06
"Harnessing genomics to improve health in India" - an executive course to support genomics policy. Health Res Policy Syst (2004) 1.06
Consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care unit patients. BMC Med Ethics (2002) 1.06
Recognition and management of delayed hyponatremia following transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. J Neurosurg (2007) 1.05
Priority setting for orphan drugs: an international comparison. Health Policy (2010) 1.04
Priority setting in surgery: improve the process and share the learning. World J Surg (2003) 1.04
Intimate examinations and other ethical challenges in medical education. BMJ (2003) 1.03
Lessons on ethical decision making from the bioscience industry. PLoS Med (2006) 1.03
Case study: India's billion dollar biotech. Nat Biotechnol (2010) 1.02
Genomics, public health and developing countries: the case of the Mexican National Institute of Genomic Medicine (INMEGEN). Nat Rev Genet (2008) 1.01
A qualitative study of attitudes toward error in patients facing brain tumour surgery. Can J Neurol Sci (2004) 1.01
Public engagement on global health challenges. BMC Public Health (2008) 1.01
Interdisciplinary research: putting the methods under the microscope. BMC Med Res Methodol (2003) 0.99
Genomic medicine and developing countries: creating a room of their own. Nat Rev Genet (2008) 0.99
"The best places to die". BMJ (2003) 0.99
South-South entrepreneurial collaboration in health biotech. Nat Biotechnol (2010) 0.99
Indian biotechnology--rapidly evolving and industry led. Nat Biotechnol (2004) 0.98
Ontario's formulary committee: how recommendations are made. Pharmacoeconomics (2003) 0.98
Mental health services for children and youth: a survey of physicians' knowledge, attitudes and use of telehealth services. J Telemed Telecare (2008) 0.98
Designing a system for patients controlling providers' access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges. J Gen Intern Med (2015) 0.97
Bedside rationing by health practitioners: a case study in a Ugandan hospital. Med Decis Making (2007) 0.97