A strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries.

PubWeight™: 1.53‹?› | Rank: Top 4%

🔗 View Article (PMID 17922194)

Published in Health Care Anal on September 01, 2007

Authors

Lydia Kapiriri1, Douglas K Martin

Author Affiliations

1: University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, 88 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1L4. lydia.kapiriri@utoronto.ca

Articles citing this

Cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the debates surrounding decision rules. Pharmacoeconomics (2009) 1.97

Accountable priority setting for trust in health systems--the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable health action in developing countries. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.61

Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness. Int J Health Policy Manag (2016) 1.25

Successful priority setting in low and middle income countries: a framework for evaluation. Health Care Anal (2009) 1.18

Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation. Implement Sci (2011) 1.18

Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania. Glob Health Action (2011) 1.05

Challenges to fair decision-making processes in the context of health care services: a qualitative assessment from Tanzania. Int J Equity Health (2012) 0.94

Increased fairness in priority setting processes within the health sector: the case of Kapiri-Mposhi District, Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res (2014) 0.93

Setting priorities for the health care sector in Zimbabwe using cost-effectiveness analysis and estimates of the burden of disease. Cost Eff Resour Alloc (2008) 0.91

From papers to practices: district level priority setting processes and criteria for family planning, maternal, newborn and child health interventions in Tanzania. BMC Womens Health (2011) 0.89

Research priority setting for health policy and health systems strengthening in Nigeria: the policymakers and stakeholders perspective and involvement. Pan Afr Med J (2013) 0.88

Hospitals as complex adaptive systems: A case study of factors influencing priority setting practices at the hospital level in Kenya. Soc Sci Med (2016) 0.88

Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation. Int J Health Policy Manag (2015) 0.86

Fairness and legitimacy of decisions during delivery of malaria services and ITN interventions in Zambia. Malar J (2010) 0.83

Medical device procurement in low- and middle-income settings: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev (2014) 0.82

The Need for Global Application of the Accountability for Reasonableness Approach to Support Sustainable Outcomes Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy". Int J Health Policy Manag (2016) 0.80

Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy". Int J Health Policy Manag (2016) 0.79

Research for better health: the Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process. Health Res Policy Syst (2014) 0.77

An assessment of priority setting process and its implication on availability of emergency obstetric care services in Malindi District, Kenya. Pan Afr Med J (2015) 0.76

Multi-Stakeholder Decision Aid for Improved Prioritization of the Public Health Impact of Climate Sensitive Infectious Diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2016) 0.75

Articles cited by this

The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care. BMJ (1998) 4.03

Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationing. BMJ (1995) 3.63

Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study. BMJ (2000) 3.03

Puzzling out priorities. Why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process. BMJ (1998) 2.65

Criteria for priority-setting in health care in Uganda: exploration of stakeholders' values. Bull World Health Organ (2004) 2.30

A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions. Health Care Anal (2003) 2.08

Evaluation of current strategies and future priorities for improving health in developing countries. BMJ (2005) 2.04

Priority setting in a hospital critical care unit: qualitative case study. Crit Care Med (2003) 2.01

Recent advances. Medical ethics. BMJ (2000) 1.96

Benchmarks of fairness for health care reform: a policy tool for developing countries. Bull World Health Organ (2000) 1.94

Priority-setting and hospital strategic planning: a qualitative case study. J Health Serv Res Policy (2003) 1.77

Using burden of disease information for health planning in developing countries: the experience from Uganda. Soc Sci Med (2003) 1.70

Keeping a tight grip on the reins: donor control over aid coordination and management in Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan (1999) 1.52

Public participation in health planning and priority setting at the district level in Uganda. Health Policy Plan (2003) 1.51

Is cost-effectiveness analysis preferred to severity of disease as the main guiding principle in priority setting in resource poor settings? The case of Uganda. Cost Eff Resour Alloc (2004) 1.36

Translations of health sector SWAps--a comparative study of health sector development cooperation in Uganda, Zambia and Bangladesh. Health Policy (2005) 1.36

Accountability for reasonableness: opening the black box of process. Health Care Anal (2005) 1.28

Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study. Health Policy (2006) 1.28

Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Health Policy (2004) 1.18

Evidence, economics and ethics: resource allocation in health services organizations. Healthc Q (2005) 1.17

Overlooked opportunities for investing in health research and development. Bull World Health Organ (2000) 1.11

Justice and solidarity in priority setting in health care. Health Care Anal (2003) 1.11

Does earmarked donor funding make it more or less likely that developing countries will allocate their resources towards programmes that yield the greatest health benefits? Bull World Health Organ (2004) 1.09

Cultural studies of biomedicine: an agenda for research. Soc Sci Med (1995) 0.86

Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting. Health Care Anal (2003) 0.83

Why prioritize when there isn't enough money? Cost Eff Resour Alloc (2003) 0.82

Globalisation, complex humanitarian emergencies and health. Ann Trop Med Parasitol (2006) 0.78

An integrated approach to resource allocation. Health Care Anal (2004) 0.75

Priority setting: learning to make tough decisions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2003) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Top ten biotechnologies for improving health in developing countries. Nat Genet (2002) 8.12

Public engagement in setting priorities in health care. CMAJ (2008) 2.37

Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 2.06

Priority setting in a hospital critical care unit: qualitative case study. Crit Care Med (2003) 2.01

Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting. BMC Health Serv Res (2009) 1.82

Nanotechnology and the developing world. PLoS Med (2005) 1.66

Priority setting in hospitals: fairness, inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences. Soc Sci Med (2005) 1.62

Accountable priority setting for trust in health systems--the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable health action in developing countries. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.61

Patients' views about cardiac report cards: a qualitative study. Can J Cardiol (2005) 1.44

Ethical issues related to cardiac report cards. Can J Cardiol (2004) 1.42

Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making? Soc Sci Med (2008) 1.40

Priority setting at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda. Health Policy (2006) 1.35

South Africa--blazing a trail for African biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol (2004) 1.34

SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 1.33

Priority setting in developing countries health care institutions: the case of a Ugandan hospital. BMC Health Serv Res (2006) 1.32

What do district health planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for reasonableness'? BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 1.28

Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study. Health Policy (2006) 1.28

Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res (2010) 1.27

The effect of priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs on medical oncologists' practice in Ontario: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 1.23

Responding to trust: surgeons' perspective on informed consent. World J Surg (2009) 1.20

Successful priority setting in low and middle income countries: a framework for evaluation. Health Care Anal (2009) 1.18

Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Health Policy (2004) 1.18

Evidence, economics and ethics: resource allocation in health services organizations. Healthc Q (2005) 1.17

Leadership and priority setting: the perspective of hospital CEOs. Health Policy (2005) 1.10

Introduction: promoting global health through biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol (2004) 1.10

Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: a transdisciplinary study. BMC Health Serv Res (2002) 1.08

Priority setting for orphan drugs: an international comparison. Health Policy (2010) 1.04

What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions? BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 1.01

A qualitative study of attitudes toward error in patients facing brain tumour surgery. Can J Neurol Sci (2004) 1.01

Interdisciplinary research: putting the methods under the microscope. BMC Med Res Methodol (2003) 0.99

Designing a system for patients controlling providers' access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges. J Gen Intern Med (2015) 0.97

Bedside rationing by health practitioners: a case study in a Ugandan hospital. Med Decis Making (2007) 0.97

Theatre as a public engagement tool for health-policy development. Health Policy (2005) 0.96

The Global Fund Secretariat's suspension of funding to Uganda: how could this have been avoided? Bull World Health Organ (2006) 0.93

Can a "good death" be made better?: A preliminary evaluation of a patient-centred quality improvement strategy for severely ill in-patients. BMC Palliat Care (2004) 0.92

Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study. BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 0.92

Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 0.92

Communication of bed allocation decisions in a critical care unit and accountability for reasonableness. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 0.91

Public views on a wait time management initiative: a matter of communication. BMC Health Serv Res (2010) 0.90

The incommensurability of research risks and benefits: practical help for research ethics committees. IRB (1995) 0.90

Concerns about ethical review of health research in India. Indian J Med Ethics (2005) 0.89

The leap to trust: perspective of cholecystectomy patients on informed decision making and consent. J Am Coll Surg (2004) 0.88

Regenerative medicine and the developing world. PLoS Med (2006) 0.86

Evaluation of an integrated model of discharge planning: achieving quality discharges in an efficient and ethical way. Can J Nurs Res (2002) 0.84

Stakeholder involvement in expensive drug recommendation decisions: an international perspective. Health Policy (2012) 0.82

Seasonal bed closures in an intensive care unit: a qualitative study. J Crit Care (2003) 0.79

Stakeholders' views about cardiac report cards: a qualitative study. Can J Cardiol (2004) 0.79

An ethical framework for cardiac report cards: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics (2005) 0.78

Healthcare sustainability and the challenges of innovation to biopharmaceuticals in Canada. Health Policy (2008) 0.78

Abortion and fetal tissue transplantation. IRB (1993) 0.75