An editorial update: should she take aspirin?

PubWeight™: 0.82‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 15941704)

Published in Ann Intern Med on June 07, 2005

Authors

Cynthia Mulrow, Michael Pignone

Articles by these authors

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (2009) 22.18

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2009) 21.74

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2009) 12.16

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 11.80

Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2002) 5.65

Enough is enough: Stop wasting money on vitamin and mineral supplements. Ann Intern Med (2013) 5.28

Association of numeracy and diabetes control. Ann Intern Med (2008) 5.08

Is this patient clinically depressed? JAMA (2002) 5.03

The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med (2015) 4.49

Influence of patient literacy on the effectiveness of a primary care-based diabetes disease management program. JAMA (2004) 4.16

A resolution for physicians: time to focus on the public health threat of gun violence. Ann Intern Med (2013) 3.99

Using the coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary heart disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med (2004) 3.64

Identifying depression in primary care: a literature synthesis of case-finding instruments. Gen Hosp Psychiatry (2002) 3.15

Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT). BMC Health Serv Res (2008) 2.42

How to decide whether a clinical practice guideline is trustworthy. JAMA (2013) 2.24

Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians. J Gen Intern Med (2003) 2.22

National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: prevention of fecal and urinary incontinence in adults. Ann Intern Med (2008) 2.10

Data sources for measuring colorectal endoscopy use among Medicare enrollees. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2007) 2.02

The relationship between literacy and glycemic control in a diabetes disease-management program. Diabetes Educ (2004) 2.02

The Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes scale: a diabetes knowledge scale for vulnerable patients. Diabetes Educ (2005) 1.97

Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg (2009) 1.94

New American Cancer Society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines. JAMA (2011) 1.88

Addressing literacy and numeracy to improve diabetes care: two randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care (2009) 1.88

Drug treatment of hyperlipidemia in women. JAMA (2004) 1.76

Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2007) 1.74

Using the coronary artery calcium score to guide statin therapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2014) 1.65

Relationship between literacy, knowledge, self-care behaviors, and heart failure-related quality of life among patients with heart failure. J Gen Intern Med (2011) 1.64

Development and pilot testing of a disease management program for low literacy patients with heart failure. Patient Educ Couns (2004) 1.58

Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia. J Gen Intern Med (2013) 1.57

Toward more uniform conflict disclosures--the updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. N Engl J Med (2010) 1.52

The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.51

Development and initial testing of a computer-based patient decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening for primary care practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2005) 1.50

A single-item self-report medication adherence question predicts hospitalisation and death in patients with heart failure. J Clin Nurs (2013) 1.48

A framework for crafting clinical practice guidelines that are relevant to the care and management of people with multimorbidity. J Gen Intern Med (2014) 1.46

Value of patient time invested in the colonoscopy screening process: time requirements for colonoscopy study. Med Decis Making (2008) 1.45

Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data. Eff Clin Pract (2002) 1.44

Propensity score adjustment with multilevel data: setting your sites on decreasing selection bias. Ann Intern Med (2010) 1.40

Interpreting Hemoglobin A1C in Combination With Conventional Risk Factors for Prediction of Cardiovascular Risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2015) 1.40

St John's wort for depression: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Psychiatry (2005) 1.40

Update on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Light of Recent Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Circulation (2015) 1.33

Screening for high blood pressure: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med (2003) 1.24

Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium. Med Decis Making (2007) 1.24

Evaluation of claims, medical records, and self-report for measuring fecal occult blood testing among medicare enrollees in fee for service. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2008) 1.24

Clarifying values: an updated review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2013) 1.22

Measures used in studies of informed decision making about cancer screening: a systematic review. Ann Behav Med (2006) 1.20

Toward more uniform conflict disclosures: the Updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. Croat Med J (2010) 1.19

Low literacy is associated with increased risk of hospitalization and death among individuals with heart failure. J Gen Intern Med (2013) 1.19

Trustworthy clinical guidelines. Ann Intern Med (2011) 1.16

Multisite randomized trial of a single-session versus multisession literacy-sensitive self-care intervention for patients with heart failure. Circulation (2012) 1.15

Heart to Heart: a computerized decision aid for assessment of coronary heart disease risk and the impact of risk-reduction interventions for primary prevention. Prev Cardiol (2004) 1.13

Comparison of a one-time educational intervention to a teach-to-goal educational intervention for self-management of heart failure: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res (2009) 1.12

The effect of progressive, reinforcing telephone education and counseling versus brief educational intervention on knowledge, self-care behaviors and heart failure symptoms. J Card Fail (2011) 1.11

Health policy and cost-effectiveness analysis: yes we can. Yes we must. Ann Intern Med (2009) 1.11

Update on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Light of Recent Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care (2015) 1.10

Evaluating the clinical utility of a biomarker: a review of methods for estimating health impact. Circulation (2011) 1.07

Interpretation of the coronary artery calcium score in combination with conventional cardiovascular risk factors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation (2013) 1.06

What does my patient's coronary artery calcium score mean? Combining information from the coronary artery calcium score with information from conventional risk factors to estimate coronary heart disease risk. BMC Med (2004) 1.06

Cost-utility of aspirin and proton pump inhibitors for primary prevention. Arch Intern Med (2011) 1.05

Screening guidelines for colorectal cancer: a twice-told tale. Ann Intern Med (2008) 1.05

Cultural and linguistic adaptation of a multimedia colorectal cancer screening decision aid for Spanish-speaking Latinos. J Health Commun (2013) 1.04

Prostate and colon cancer screening messages in popular magazines. J Gen Intern Med (2004) 1.04

Exercise tolerance testing to screen for coronary heart disease: a systematic review for the technical support for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2004) 1.02

A targeted decision aid for the elderly to decide whether to undergo colorectal cancer screening: development and results of an uncontrolled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2010) 1.02

Health literacy and diabetic control. JAMA (2002) 1.02

Implementation Science Workshop: primary care-based multidisciplinary readmission prevention program. J Gen Intern Med (2014) 0.97

Patient time requirements for anticoagulation therapy with warfarin. Med Decis Making (2009) 0.97

Patient preferences for colon cancer screening: the role of out-of-pocket costs. Am J Manag Care (2007) 0.96

Health insurance-related disparities in colorectal cancer screening in Virginia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2008) 0.95

"Teach to goal": theory and design principles of an intervention to improve heart failure self-management skills of patients with low health literacy. J Health Commun (2011) 0.95

Towards more uniform conflict disclosures: the updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. BMJ (2010) 0.94

Pharmacist-led, primary care-based disease management improves hemoglobin A1c in high-risk patients with diabetes. Am J Med Qual (2003) 0.91

Closing in on the truth about recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: evidence synthesis, data sharing, peer review, and reproducible research. Ann Intern Med (2013) 0.89

Self-care confidence mediates the relationship between perceived social support and self-care maintenance in adults with heart failure. J Card Fail (2013) 0.89

Estimating the cost of no-shows and evaluating the effects of mitigation strategies. Med Decis Making (2013) 0.89

Development and evaluation of a new survey instrument to measure the quality of colorectal cancer screening decisions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2014) 0.88

Extracolonic findings with computed tomographic colonography: asset or liability? Arch Intern Med (2008) 0.87

Peer review: integral to Science and indispensable to Annals. Ann Intern Med (2003) 0.87

An editorial update: should benefits of radical prostatectomy affect the decision to screen for early prostate cancer? Ann Intern Med (2005) 0.87

Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among members of black churches, Michigan and North Carolina, 2008-2010. Prev Chronic Dis (2013) 0.86

The middle-aged and older American: wrong prototype for a preventive polypill? Ann Intern Med (2005) 0.86

Willingness-to-pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy. Health Econ (2010) 0.86

Postmenopausal hormone therapy: the heart of the matter. Ann Intern Med (2013) 0.85

Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment. Value Health (2011) 0.85

Effectiveness of a patient- and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: design and baseline findings of the CHOICE trial. Cancer (2010) 0.85

Parents with low literacy report higher quality of parent-provider relationships in a residency clinic. Ambul Pediatr (2007) 0.84

Self-reported recall and daily diary-recorded measures of weight monitoring adherence: associations with heart failure-related hospitalization. BMC Cardiovasc Disord (2014) 0.83

Report of the independent panel considering the retraction of two articles in The BMJ. BMJ (2014) 0.83

Weighing the benefits and downsides of prostate-specific antigen screening. Arch Intern Med (2009) 0.83

Toward more uniform conflict disclosures: the updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. JAMA (2010) 0.83

Testing a Spanish-language colorectal cancer screening decision aid in Latinos with limited English proficiency: results from a pre-post trial and four month follow-up survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2012) 0.82

Colorectal cancer screening and physical activity promotion among obese women: an online evaluation of targeted messages. J Health Commun (2012) 0.82

Use of coronary calcification scores to predict coronary heart disease. JAMA (2004) 0.81

Is adherence to weight monitoring or weight-based diuretic self-adjustment associated with fewer heart failure-related emergency department visits or hospitalizations? J Card Fail (2012) 0.81

Toward more uniform conflict disclosures--the updated ICMJE reporting form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Rev Med Chil (2010) 0.79

Using information technology to transfer knowledge: a medical institution steps up to the plate. Ann Intern Med (2005) 0.78

Toward more uniform conflict disclosures: the updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. Natl Med J India (2010) 0.78

Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials (2014) 0.78

Health literacy and computer-assisted instruction: usability and patient preference. J Health Commun (2015) 0.77