[-2]proenzyme prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection: a national cancer institute early detection research network validation study.

PubWeight™: 1.47‹?› | Rank: Top 5%

🔗 View Article (PMC 2647141)

Published in J Urol on June 11, 2008

Authors

Lori J Sokoll1, Yinghui Wang, Ziding Feng, Jacob Kagan, Alan W Partin, Martin G Sanda, Ian M Thompson, Daniel W Chan

Author Affiliations

1: Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. lsokoll@jhmi.edu

Articles citing this

A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range. J Urol (2011) 2.65

Prospective evaluation of operating characteristics of prostate cancer detection biomarkers. J Urol (2010) 2.54

A prospective, multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [-2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2010) 2.36

Association of [-2]proPSA with biopsy reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer. J Urol (2012) 1.80

Biomarkers in prostate cancer surveillance and screening: past, present, and future. Ther Adv Urol (2013) 1.48

[-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study. J Urol (2010) 1.40

Glycoproteomics for prostate cancer detection: changes in serum PSA glycosylation patterns. J Proteome Res (2009) 1.30

Pro-prostate-specific antigen measurements in serum and tissue are associated with treatment necessity among men enrolled in expectant management for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2009) 1.26

Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Men. J Urol (2015) 1.13

The Early Detection Research Network's Specimen reference sets: paving the way for rapid evaluation of potential biomarkers. Clin Chem (2012) 1.05

Early Detection of Cancer: Immunoassays for Plasma Tumor Markers. Expert Opin Med Diagn (2009) 1.04

Clinical collection and protein properties of expressed prostatic secretions as a source for biomarkers of prostatic disease. J Proteomics (2009) 1.03

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is activated by KLK2 in prostate cancer ex vivo models and in prostate-targeted PSA/KLK2 double transgenic mice. Prostate (2010) 0.96

Prostate-specific antigen: any successor in sight? Rev Urol (2013) 0.95

Emerging PSA-based tests to improve screening. Urol Clin North Am (2014) 0.94

Diagnostic ability of %p2PSA and prostate health index for aggressive prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep (2014) 0.91

Next-generation prostate-specific antigen test: precursor form of prostate-specific antigen. Int J Clin Oncol (2014) 0.91

Early prostate-specific antigen changes and the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol (2009) 0.85

A pilot study evaluating serum pro-prostate-specific antigen in patients with rising PSA following radical prostatectomy. Oncol Lett (2012) 0.85

Clinical use of [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivatives (%p2PSA and Prostate Health Index) for the detection of prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Korean J Urol (2014) 0.84

How Precisely Can Prostate Cancer Be Managed? Int Neurourol J (2016) 0.83

Artificial neural networks and prostate cancer--tools for diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Urol (2013) 0.83

Detection of aggressive prostate cancer associated glycoproteins in urine using glycoproteomics and mass spectrometry. Proteomics (2016) 0.77

Articles cited by this

Evaluation of percentage of free serum prostate-specific antigen to improve specificity of prostate cancer screening. JAMA (1995) 2.63

Proenzyme forms of prostate-specific antigen in serum improve the detection of prostate cancer. Clin Chem (2004) 1.85

Complexed prostate specific antigen improves specificity for prostate cancer detection: results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Urol (2003) 1.67

Proenzyme psa for the early detection of prostate cancer in the 2.5-4.0 ng/ml total psa range: preliminary analysis. Urology (2003) 1.46

Free prostate-specific antigen in serum is becoming more complex. Urology (2002) 1.46

Serum pro-prostate specific antigen preferentially detects aggressive prostate cancers in men with 2 to 4 ng/ml prostate specific antigen. J Urol (2004) 1.44

Serum pro prostate specific antigen improves cancer detection compared to free and complexed prostate specific antigen in men with prostate specific antigen 2 to 4 ng/ml. J Urol (2003) 1.40

Evaluation of proprostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer in men with a total prostate specific antigen range of 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml. J Urol (2003) 1.30

A precursor form of prostate-specific antigen is more highly elevated in prostate cancer compared with benign transition zone prostate tissue. Cancer Res (2000) 1.27

Purification and characterization of different molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen in human seminal fluid. Clin Chem (1995) 1.21

"BPSA," a specific molecular form of free prostate-specific antigen, is found predominantly in the transition zone of patients with nodular benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology (2000) 1.20

Additional use of [-2] precursor prostate-specific antigen and "benign" PSA at diagnosis in screen-detected prostate cancer. Urology (2005) 1.11

Evaluation of precursor prostate-specific antigen isoform ratios in the detection of prostate cancer. Urol Oncol (2005) 1.09

Immunohistochemical staining of prostate cancer with monoclonal antibodies to the precursor of prostate-specific antigen. Urology (2003) 1.05

Pooling of case specimens to create standard serum sets for screening cancer biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2007) 0.98

The value of (-7, -5)pro-prostate-specific antigen and human kallikrein-2 as serum markers for grading prostate cancer. BJU Int (2004) 0.98

A multicenter clinical trial on the use of (-5, -7) pro prostate specific antigen. J Urol (2005) 0.96

A (-5, -7) proPSA based artificial neural network to detect prostate cancer. Eur Urol (2006) 0.93

Articles by these authors

Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24. Nat Genet (2007) 19.18

The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature (2002) 18.30

Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA (2008) 13.35

Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 13.00

Vitamin E and the risk of prostate cancer: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA (2011) 11.02

Plasma phospholipid fatty acids and prostate cancer risk in the SELECT trial. J Natl Cancer Inst (2013) 10.30

Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 9.91

Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA (2005) 8.72

Autoantibody signatures in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med (2005) 7.56

Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men. Cancer Res (2002) 7.11

Ligand-independent androgen receptor variants derived from splicing of cryptic exons signify hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res (2009) 7.11

Association between body-mass index and risk of death in more than 1 million Asians. N Engl J Med (2011) 6.89

Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 6.79

Diagnostic markers for early detection of ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2008) 6.47

American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin (2010) 6.45

Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med (2013) 6.17

Common sequence variants on 2p15 and Xp11.22 confer susceptibility to prostate cancer. Nat Genet (2008) 6.10

An empirical evaluation of guidelines on prostate-specific antigen velocity in prostate cancer detection. J Natl Cancer Inst (2011) 5.73

Three biomarkers identified from serum proteomic analysis for the detection of early stage ovarian cancer. Cancer Res (2004) 5.68

Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: an opportunity for improvement. JAMA (2013) 5.56

Germline mutations in HOXB13 and prostate-cancer risk. N Engl J Med (2012) 5.49

Overview of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project: results from the pilot phase with 35 collaborating laboratories and multiple analytical groups, generating a core dataset of 3020 proteins and a publicly-available database. Proteomics (2005) 5.42

Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol (2011) 5.27

Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA (2008) 5.25

alpha-Methylacyl coenzyme A racemase as a tissue biomarker for prostate cancer. JAMA (2002) 5.07

Two genome-wide association studies of aggressive prostate cancer implicate putative prostate tumor suppressor gene DAB2IP. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 4.85

Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol (2003) 4.66

Finasteride and high-grade prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 4.64

Integrating the predictiveness of a marker with its performance as a classifier. Am J Epidemiol (2007) 4.59

Alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxyprothrombin, and lectin-bound alpha-fetoprotein in early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology (2009) 4.50

Proteomics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum biomarkers to detect breast cancer. Clin Chem (2002) 4.42

Association between two unlinked loci at 8q24 and prostate cancer risk among European Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 4.24

African American men with very low-risk prostate cancer exhibit adverse oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy: should active surveillance still be an option for them? J Clin Oncol (2013) 4.20

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program. J Clin Oncol (2010) 4.17

Comprehensive comparison of health-related quality of life after contemporary therapies for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2002) 4.13

Obesity, diabetes, and risk of prostate cancer: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2006) 4.02

Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology (2007) 4.02

Finasteride does not increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer: a bias-adjusted modeling approach. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) (2008) 3.99

Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer. JAMA (2011) 3.92

Multiplex biomarker approach for determining risk of prostate-specific antigen-defined recurrence of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 3.73

Evaluation of serum protein profiling by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the detection of prostate cancer: I. Assessment of platform reproducibility. Clin Chem (2005) 3.71

Evaluating the predictiveness of a continuous marker. Biometrics (2007) 3.54

Do mixed histological features affect survival benefit from neoadjuvant platinum-based combination chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer? A secondary analysis of Southwest Oncology Group-Directed Intergroup Study (S8710). BJU Int (2010) 3.47

Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol (2002) 3.41

Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol (2011) 3.36

Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on prostate tissue in men with late-onset hypogonadism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2006) 3.32

Obesity-related plasma hemodilution and PSA concentration among men with prostate cancer. JAMA (2007) 3.25

An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol (2004) 3.21

Evidence for two independent prostate cancer risk-associated loci in the HNF1B gene at 17q12. Nat Genet (2008) 3.14

Boosted decision tree analysis of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectral serum profiles discriminates prostate cancer from noncancer patients. Clin Chem (2002) 3.05

Designing the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.99

Predominant treatment failure in postprostatectomy patients is local: analysis of patterns of treatment failure in SWOG 8794. J Clin Oncol (2007) 2.97

Estimated impact of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial on population mortality. Cancer (2005) 2.91

Lung cancer risk among female textile workers exposed to endotoxin. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 2.87

Long-term outcomes among localized prostate cancer survivors: health-related quality-of-life changes after radical prostatectomy, external radiation, and brachytherapy. J Clin Oncol (2005) 2.84

Death in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: prostate-specific antigen doubling time subgroups and their associated contributions to all-cause mortality. J Clin Oncol (2007) 2.79

An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011. BJU Int (2012) 2.77

Germline mutations and sequence variants of the macrophage scavenger receptor 1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk. Nat Genet (2002) 2.76

5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol (2005) 2.72

HUPO Plasma Proteome Project specimen collection and handling: towards the standardization of parameters for plasma proteome samples. Proteomics (2005) 2.71

Urinary TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 in an active surveillance cohort: results from a baseline analysis in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study. Clin Cancer Res (2013) 2.70

A data-analytic strategy for protein biomarker discovery: profiling of high-dimensional proteomic data for cancer detection. Biostatistics (2003) 2.69

Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int (2013) 2.69

The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up. BJU Int (2011) 2.68

Retracted EPCA-2: a highly specific serum marker for prostate cancer. Urology (2007) 2.67

Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance. J Urol (2013) 2.66

A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range. J Urol (2011) 2.65

PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome. J Urol (2008) 2.63

Urine TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript stratifies prostate cancer risk in men with elevated serum PSA. Sci Transl Med (2011) 2.62

Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis. Cancer (2004) 2.61

Adjuvant androgen deprivation for high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: SWOG S9921 study. J Clin Oncol (2011) 2.57

Prospective evaluation of operating characteristics of prostate cancer detection biomarkers. J Urol (2010) 2.54

Prediction of mortality after radical prostatectomy by Charlson comorbidity index. Urology (2010) 2.54

Living with prostate cancer: patients' and spouses' psychosocial status and quality of life. J Clin Oncol (2007) 2.53

Prevalence of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer among men undergoing prostate biopsy in the United States. Clin Cancer Res (2009) 2.51

Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3): development and internal validation of a novel biopsy nomogram. Eur Urol (2009) 2.45

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines for use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers. Clin Chem (2008) 2.44

Pathologic characteristics of cancers detected in The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial: implications for prostate cancer detection and chemoprevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) (2008) 2.43

Racial/ethnic disparities in the treatment of localized/regional prostate cancer. J Urol (2004) 2.39

SELDI-TOF MS whole serum proteomic profiling with IMAC surface does not reliably detect prostate cancer. Clin Chem (2007) 2.38

A prospective, multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [-2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2010) 2.36

PTEN protein loss by immunostaining: analytic validation and prognostic indicator for a high risk surgical cohort of prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res (2011) 2.35

Standard operating procedures for serum and plasma collection: early detection research network consensus statement standard operating procedure integration working group. J Proteome Res (2009) 2.33