Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card.

PubWeight™: 2.46‹?› | Rank: Top 2%

🔗 View Article (PMC 2720724)

Published in J Natl Cancer Inst on September 09, 2008

Authors

Karl Y Bilimoria1, David J Bentrem, Andrew K Stewart, Mark S Talamonti, David P Winchester, Thomas R Russell, Clifford Y Ko

Author Affiliations

1: Cancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. kbilimoria@facs.org

Articles citing this

Effects of socioeconomic status on colon cancer treatment accessibility and survival in Toronto, Ontario, and San Francisco, California, 1996-2006. Am J Public Health (2010) 1.51

Negative lymph node count is associated with survival of colorectal cancer patients, independent of tumoral molecular alterations and lymphocytic reaction. Am J Gastroenterol (2009) 1.26

Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital? J Gastrointest Surg (2010) 1.20

Effects of being uninsured or underinsured and living in extremely poor neighborhoods on colon cancer care and survival in California: historical cohort analysis, 1996-2011. BMC Public Health (2012) 1.00

Impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg (2010) 0.98

Predictors of lymph node count in colorectal cancer resections: data from US nationwide prospective cohort studies. Arch Surg (2012) 0.97

Nodal staging score: a tool to assess adequate staging of node-negative colon cancer. J Clin Oncol (2009) 0.96

What factors influence minority use of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers? Cancer (2013) 0.95

Oral benzo[a]pyrene-induced cancer: two distinct types in different target organs depend on the mouse Cyp1 genotype. Int J Cancer (2010) 0.95

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy does not necessarily reduce lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer specimens--results from a prospective evaluation with extensive pathological work-up. J Gastrointest Surg (2009) 0.93

Lymph node counts and survival rates after resection for colon and rectal cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res (2009) 0.91

TNM staging of colorectal cancer should be reconsidered by T stage weighting. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 0.91

Quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery and care according to patient-, tumor-, and hospital-related factors. BMC Cancer (2012) 0.91

Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 0.90

The complexity of the count: considerations regarding lymph node evaluation in colorectal carcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol (2012) 0.89

Number of lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: How many are needed? World J Gastrointest Surg (2012) 0.88

Is quality of colorectal cancer care good enough? Core measures development and its application for comparing hospitals in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res (2010) 0.87

Evaluation of lymph nodes in patients with colon cancer undergoing colon resection: a population-based study. World J Surg (2012) 0.84

Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure. CA Cancer J Clin (2009) 0.83

Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines. Tech Coloproctol (2015) 0.82

Increasing use of dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy for men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2014) 0.82

Metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic variable in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection. Tech Coloproctol (2011) 0.81

Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol (2015) 0.81

Lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in an era of quality guidelines: who improves? J Oncol Pract (2013) 0.79

Influence of socioeconomic status and hospital type on disparities of lymph node evaluation in colon cancer patients. Cancer (2011) 0.79

Exploration of the Optimal Minimum Lymph Node Count after Colon Cancer Resection for Patients Aged 80 Years and Older. Sci Rep (2016) 0.79

Number of retrieved lymph nodes and survival in node-negative patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. Tech Coloproctol (2010) 0.78

Factors influencing patient pathways for receipt of cancer care at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center. PLoS One (2014) 0.78

Lymph nodes' evaluation in relation to colorectal cancer staging among African Americans. BMC Cancer (2015) 0.78

Surgery has a key role for quality assurance of colorectal cancer screening programs: impact of the third level multidisciplinary team on lymph nodal staging. Int J Colorectal Dis (2015) 0.78

The Evaluation of More Lymph Nodes in Colon Cancer Is Associated with Improved Survival in Patients of All Ages. PLoS One (2016) 0.77

Solitary lymph node metastasis is a distinct subset of colon cancer associated with good survival: a retrospective study of surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results population-based data. BMC Cancer (2014) 0.77

Does geography influence the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer? A population-based analysis. World J Surg Oncol (2013) 0.77

Clinical and pathologic factors affecting lymph node yields in colorectal cancer. PLoS One (2013) 0.75

Using the American College of Surgeons cancer registry to drive quality. J Oncol Pract (2013) 0.75

Optimizing lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. Surg Endosc (2010) 0.75

Effects of Hospital Type and Distance on Lymph Node Assessment for Colon Cancer Among Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Patients in Appalachia. Med Care Res Rev (2015) 0.75

Lymph node count in colorectal cancer - do we have the final answer? J Gastrointest Oncol (2012) 0.75

Surgical quality in colorectal cancer. Ann Med Surg (Lond) (2015) 0.75

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Affects Lymph Node Yield and Status Without Clear Implications on Outcome: The Case for Eliminating a Metric and Using Preoperative Staging to Guide Therapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2016) 0.75

Ex vivo localization and immunohistochemical detection of sentinel lymph node micrometastasis in patients with colorectal cancer can upgrade tumor staging. Diagn Pathol (2012) 0.75

Evaluating disparities in inpatient surgical cancer care among American Indian/Alaska Native patients. Am J Surg (2016) 0.75

Quality control in colorectal cancer care: how many lymph nodes should be harvested? World J Surg (2010) 0.75

Variability in the lymph node retrieval after resection of colon cancer: Influence of operative period and process. Medicine (Baltimore) (2016) 0.75

Occult tumor metastasis and the prognostic value of sentinel lymph nodes in rectal cancer. Oncol Lett (2011) 0.75

Utilization and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with resected stage II colon cancer: a multi-institutional analysis. J Surg Res (2017) 0.75

Assessing the adequacy of lymph node yield for different tumor stages of colon cancer by nodal staging scores. BMC Cancer (2017) 0.75

Articles cited by this

Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin (2008) 86.74

What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA (1998) 26.79

Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol (2003) 5.71

Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst (2001) 5.68

Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 5.48

Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA (2007) 4.55

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: colon cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2009) 4.41

The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol (2008) 3.82

Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol (2005) 3.50

Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol (2006) 3.38

Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Oncol (2003) 3.27

Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol (2002) 3.19

Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA (2000) 3.18

The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol (2003) 3.02

Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.91

More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg (2006) 2.78

For patients with Dukes' B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer (1998) 2.16

Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg (2002) 1.95

Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined. World J Surg (2002) 1.64

Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking. J Eval Clin Pract (1999) 1.51

Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas? J Surg Oncol (2002) 1.37

Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg (2006) 1.31

Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens. Surg Endosc (2007) 1.29

Concordance with NCCN Colorectal Cancer Guidelines and ASCO/NCCN Quality Measures: an NCCN institutional analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2009) 1.25

Adequacy and importance of lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg (2007) 1.20

College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: solid tumor prognostic factors-which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation. Cancer Committee and Conference Participants. Arch Pathol Lab Med (2000) 1.17

Impact of tumor location on nodal evaluation for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum (2008) 1.15

Lymph node counts in colon cancer surgery: lessons for users of quality indicators. JAMA (2007) 1.00

New approaches to the adjuvant therapy of colon cancer. Oncologist (2006) 0.98

Quality of pathology reporting impacts on lymph node yield in colon cancer. J Clin Oncol (2007) 0.94

Lymph node examination rate, survival rate, and quality of care in colon cancer. JAMA (2008) 0.88

Lymph node examination rate, survival rate, and quality of care in colon cancer. JAMA (2008) 0.87

Articles by these authors

Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 10.61

Extent of surgery affects survival for papillary thyroid cancer. Ann Surg (2007) 4.73

Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol (2009) 4.53

Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data. J Clin Oncol (2009) 4.09

The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol (2008) 3.82

National failure to operate on early stage pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg (2007) 3.65

Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg (2009) 3.55

Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA (2006) 3.35

Are 80 hours a week enough to train a surgeon? MedGenMed (2005) 3.27

Updated population-based review of carcinoid tumors. Ann Surg (2004) 3.21

Small bowel cancer in the United States: changes in epidemiology, treatment, and survival over the last 20 years. Ann Surg (2009) 3.07

Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg (2009) 3.05

Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2013) 3.03

The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol (2003) 3.02

Use of radioactive iodine for thyroid cancer. JAMA (2011) 2.98

Pay for performance (PFP). Bull Am Coll Surg (2005) 2.96

Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique? Ann Surg (2011) 2.87

Validation of the 6th edition AJCC Pancreatic Cancer Staging System: report from the National Cancer Database. Cancer (2007) 2.85

Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg (2008) 2.80

Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol (2008) 2.74

A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complications. Ann Surg (2012) 2.72

The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg (2003) 2.70

American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures. J Clin Oncol (2008) 2.69

The immenent physician workforce shortage and its impact on emergency care. Bull Am Coll Surg (2005) 2.68

Expression of RORγt marks a pathogenic regulatory T cell subset in human colon cancer. Sci Transl Med (2012) 2.62

Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in adults with acute appendicitis. Arch Surg (2010) 2.53

Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg (2008) 2.53

Patterns of surgical care of lung cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg (2005) 2.51

A 10-year outcomes evaluation of mucinous and signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum (2005) 2.45

First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg (2011) 2.40

Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg (2013) 2.37

Evaluation of surveillance bias and the validity of the venous thromboembolism quality measure. JAMA (2013) 2.31

Rates of colon and rectal cancers are increasing in young adults. Am Surg (2003) 2.30

Hypo-functional SLC26A4 variants associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss and enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct: genotype-phenotype correlation or coincidental polymorphisms? Hum Mutat (2009) 2.25

Readmissions following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas cancer: a population-based appraisal. Ann Surg Oncol (2008) 2.20

Do young colon cancer patients have worse outcomes? World J Surg (2004) 2.20

Validity and feasibility of the american college of surgeons colectomy composite outcome quality measure. Ann Surg (2013) 2.18

Factors predicting complication rates following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2006) 2.15

Perioperative blood transfusion is associated with decreased survival in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional study. J Gastrointest Surg (2014) 2.15

Full-dose gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol (2008) 2.15

Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg (2010) 2.14

Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer? Surgery (2002) 2.13

Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed? J Am Coll Surg (2010) 2.12

The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg (2011) 2.12

Hospitalization before and after gastric bypass surgery. JAMA (2005) 2.12

Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg (2008) 2.10

Adrenocortical carcinoma in the United States: treatment utilization and prognostic factors. Cancer (2008) 2.09

Cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and potential opportunities for improvement. Ann Surg Oncol (2012) 2.08

Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin (2002) 2.07

Surgical considerations for the management and resection of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg (2007) 2.04

Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2011) 2.03

Malignancies of the appendix: beyond case series reports. Dis Colon Rectum (2005) 2.02

From my perspective. Professional liability. Bull Am Coll Surg (2003) 2.02

Surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: does it improve survival? Ann Surg Oncol (2004) 2.01

Adherence with postdischarge venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis recommendations after colorectal cancer surgery among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Ann Surg (2014) 1.97

The National Cancer Data Base: a clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool. J Surg Oncol (2004) 1.94

Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg (2012) 1.94

Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 1.92

Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and completion axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2009) 1.90

Circulating monocytes from systemic sclerosis patients with interstitial lung disease show an enhanced profibrotic phenotype. Lab Invest (2010) 1.90

Reliability of superficial surgical site infections as a hospital quality measure. J Am Coll Surg (2011) 1.90

Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg (2008) 1.90

Association between occurrence of a postoperative complication and readmission: implications for quality improvement and cost savings. Ann Surg (2013) 1.87

Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg (2012) 1.86