Readmissions following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas cancer: a population-based appraisal.

PubWeight™: 2.20‹?› | Rank: Top 2%

🔗 View Article (PMID 19002528)

Published in Ann Surg Oncol on November 11, 2008

Authors

Irina Yermilov1, David Bentrem, Evan Sekeris, Sushma Jain, Melinda A Maggard, Clifford Y Ko, James S Tomlinson

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Surgery, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Articles citing this

Exploring the burden of inpatient readmissions after major cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol (2014) 2.84

Influence of patient, physician, and hospital factors on 30-day readmission following pancreatoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg (2013) 2.03

Readmission after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in Medicare patients. J Gastrointest Surg (2009) 1.66

Patient readmission and mortality after surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancies. J Am Coll Surg (2012) 1.55

A six-gene signature predicts survival of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PLoS Med (2010) 1.46

A novel risk scoring system reliably predicts readmission after pancreatectomy. J Am Coll Surg (2015) 1.43

Pre- and intraoperative variables affecting early outcomes in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) (2011) 1.00

Factors associated with recidivism following pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) (2011) 0.98

Rehospitalization to primary versus different facilities following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg (2014) 0.94

Readmission following pancreatectomy: what can be improved? HPB (Oxford) (2013) 0.89

Hospital readmission after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an emerging quality metric? HPB (Oxford) (2012) 0.88

General and vascular surgery readmissions: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg (2014) 0.88

Readmission after pancreatic resection: causes and causality pattern. Ann Surg Oncol (2014) 0.86

Tracking early readmission after pancreatectomy to index and nonindex institutions: a more accurate assessment of readmission. JAMA Surg (2015) 0.86

Pancreatic surgery in the very old: face to face with a challenge of the near future. World J Surg (2013) 0.84

Association of discharge home with home health care and 30-day readmission after pancreatectomy. J Am Coll Surg (2014) 0.83

Surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors in elderly patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg (2013) 0.81

Recent advances and limitations of surgical treatment for pancreatic cancer. World J Clin Oncol (2011) 0.80

A 6-day clinical pathway after a pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible, safe and efficient. HPB (Oxford) (2012) 0.79

Early hospital readmission for gastrointestinal-related complications predicts long-term mortality after pancreatectomy. Am J Surg (2015) 0.78

Association of Patient-Reported Readiness for Discharge and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems Patient Satisfaction Scores: A Retrospective Analysis. J Am Coll Surg (2015) 0.75

Readmissions After Colon Cancer Surgery: Does It Matter Where Patients Are Readmitted? J Oncol Pract (2016) 0.75

Total mesopancreas excision for pancreatic head cancer: analysis of 120 cases. Chin J Cancer Res (2016) 0.75

Readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an issue of survival and survivorship. Ann Surg Oncol (2008) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 10.61

Extent of surgery affects survival for papillary thyroid cancer. Ann Surg (2007) 4.73

The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol (2008) 3.82

National failure to operate on early stage pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg (2007) 3.65

Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg (2009) 3.55

Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA (2006) 3.35

Updated population-based review of carcinoid tumors. Ann Surg (2004) 3.21

Small bowel cancer in the United States: changes in epidemiology, treatment, and survival over the last 20 years. Ann Surg (2009) 3.07

Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg (2009) 3.05

Validation of the 6th edition AJCC Pancreatic Cancer Staging System: report from the National Cancer Database. Cancer (2007) 2.85

Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg (2008) 2.80

Colorectal cancer in the young. Am J Surg (2004) 2.80

Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol (2008) 2.74

A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complications. Ann Surg (2012) 2.72

The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg (2003) 2.70

American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures. J Clin Oncol (2008) 2.69

Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in adults with acute appendicitis. Arch Surg (2010) 2.53

Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg (2008) 2.53

Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 2.46

A 10-year outcomes evaluation of mucinous and signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum (2005) 2.45

First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg (2011) 2.40

Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg (2013) 2.37

Evaluation of surveillance bias and the validity of the venous thromboembolism quality measure. JAMA (2013) 2.31

Rates of colon and rectal cancers are increasing in young adults. Am Surg (2003) 2.30

Do young colon cancer patients have worse outcomes? World J Surg (2004) 2.20

Validity and feasibility of the american college of surgeons colectomy composite outcome quality measure. Ann Surg (2013) 2.18

Factors predicting complication rates following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2006) 2.15

Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg (2010) 2.14

The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg (2011) 2.12

Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed? J Am Coll Surg (2010) 2.12

Hospitalization before and after gastric bypass surgery. JAMA (2005) 2.12

Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg (2008) 2.10

Malignancies of the appendix: beyond case series reports. Dis Colon Rectum (2005) 2.02

Surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: does it improve survival? Ann Surg Oncol (2004) 2.01

Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg (2012) 1.94

Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 1.92

Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and completion axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2009) 1.90

Reliability of superficial surgical site infections as a hospital quality measure. J Am Coll Surg (2011) 1.90

Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg (2008) 1.90

Association between occurrence of a postoperative complication and readmission: implications for quality improvement and cost savings. Ann Surg (2013) 1.87

Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg (2012) 1.86

Thirty-day mortality statistics underestimate the risk of repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: a statewide experience. J Vasc Surg (2006) 1.84

Does graded histologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict survival for completely resected gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol (2007) 1.84

Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg (2013) 1.84

Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Arch Surg (2009) 1.83

Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg (2009) 1.83

Evaluation of the guidelines for management of pancreatic branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2008) 1.82

Impact of tumor grade on prognosis in pancreatic cancer: should we include grade in AJCC staging? Ann Surg Oncol (2010) 1.82

Cancer-directed surgery for localized disease: decreased use in the elderly. Ann Surg Oncol (2004) 1.80

Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery (2010) 1.77

Underuse of axillary dissection for the management of sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer. Arch Surg (2010) 1.76

Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol (2009) 1.75

Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement. Surgery (2010) 1.74

Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum (2006) 1.72

Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg (2009) 1.70

Reliability adjustment for reporting hospital outcomes with surgery. Ann Surg (2012) 1.70

Are survival rates different for young and older patients with rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum (2004) 1.69

Small bowel obstruction: a population-based appraisal. J Am Coll Surg (2006) 1.65

Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery. Surgery (2007) 1.65

Multimodality therapy for pancreatic cancer in the U.S. : utilization, outcomes, and the effect of hospital volume. Cancer (2007) 1.63

Missing data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are not missing at random: implications and potential impact on quality assessments. J Am Coll Surg (2010) 1.62

A meta-analysis of perioperative beta blockade: what is the actual risk reduction? Surgery (2005) 1.61

Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource. HPB (Oxford) (2010) 1.61

Complete lymph node dissection for sentinel node-positive melanoma: assessment of practice patterns in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol (2008) 1.60

Wait times for cancer surgery in the United States: trends and predictors of delays. Ann Surg (2011) 1.59

Risk factors for superficial vs deep/organ-space surgical site infections: implications for quality improvement initiatives. JAMA Surg (2013) 1.59

Using the NCDB for cancer care improvement: an introduction to available quality assessment tools. J Surg Oncol (2009) 1.58

Effect of postoperative complications on adjuvant chemotherapy use for stage III colon cancer. Ann Surg (2013) 1.56

Do young breast cancer patients have worse outcomes? J Surg Res (2003) 1.53

Risk-based selective referral for cancer surgery: a potential strategy to improve perioperative outcomes. Ann Surg (2010) 1.53

Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2009) 1.50

Risk of surgery following recent myocardial infarction. Ann Surg (2011) 1.47

Comparison of hospital performance in trauma vs emergency and elective general surgery: implications for acute care surgery quality improvement. Arch Surg (2012) 1.46

Effect of hospital volume on margin status after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg (2008) 1.46

Variation in lymph node examination after esophagectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg (2012) 1.46

Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 1.45

A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Cancer (2004) 1.45

Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery. J Am Coll Surg (2012) 1.45

Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg (2007) 1.44

Application of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging system to pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Am Coll Surg (2007) 1.44

Are 12 nodes needed to accurately stage T1 and T2 colon cancers? Dig Dis Sci (2008) 1.44

The role of Surgical Champions in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program--a national survey. J Surg Res (2010) 1.43

Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a disease of MUC2-expressing goblet cells. Am J Pathol (2002) 1.42