Published in Patient Educ Couns on August 23, 2010
Testing an Intelligent Tutoring System to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment | NCT03511690
Numeracy and literacy independently predict patients' ability to identify out-of-range test results. J Med Internet Res (2014) 1.96
Social and Clinical Determinants of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. JAMA Surg (2014) 1.36
Decision making and cancer. Am Psychol (2015) 1.05
Current concepts for PrEP adherence in the PrEP revolution: from clinical trials to routine practice. Curr Opin HIV AIDS (2016) 1.04
Patients' intuitive judgments about surveillance endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: a review and application to models of decision-making. Dis Esophagus (2013) 1.03
Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol (2015) 0.91
Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale. J Med Internet Res (2012) 0.88
Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open (2014) 0.81
Patients' ratings of genetic conditions validate a taxonomy to simplify decisions about preconception carrier screening via genome sequencing. Am J Med Genet A (2016) 0.81
Current challenges in health economic modeling of cancer therapies: a research inquiry. Am Health Drug Benefits (2014) 0.75
Risk-reducing mastectomy. Minerva Ginecol (2016) 0.75
Understanding Women's Choice of Mastectomy Versus Breast Conserving Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Clin Med Insights Oncol (2017) 0.75
Risk calculators-methods, development, implementation, and validation. Int J Colorectal Dis (2016) 0.75
Effects of Promotional Materials on Attitudes and Fear towards Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese Older Adults: An Experimental Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2017) 0.75
Using a Non-Fit Message Helps to De-Intensify Negative Reactions to Tough Advice. Pers Soc Psychol Bull (2016) 0.75
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science (1974) 34.89
Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst (1998) 22.10
Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull (2001) 10.56
General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making (2001) 7.83
Numeracy and decision making. Psychol Sci (2006) 4.92
Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Aff (Millwood) (2007) 3.18
Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychol (2005) 2.90
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med Decis Making (2007) 2.89
Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice. Ann Behav Med (2008) 2.69
Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst (1995) 2.45
The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns (2008) 2.42
Risk communication in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (1999) 1.66
Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence. J Health Commun (2008) 1.65
Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Educ Couns (2008) 1.60
The role of decision analysis in informed consent: choosing between intuition and systematicity. Soc Sci Med (1997) 1.53
"If I'm better than average, then I'm ok?": Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits. Patient Educ Couns (2007) 1.51
Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics. Cancer (2008) 1.50
Attitudes and interest in genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in diverse groups of women in western Washington. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (1999) 1.49
Unintended effects of emphasizing disparities in cancer communication to African-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2008) 1.48
Objective standards are not enough: affective, self-evaluative, and behavioral responses to social comparison information. J Pers Soc Psychol (1997) 1.48
Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions. J Exp Psychol Appl (2009) 1.47
How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey. Patient Educ Couns (2005) 1.47
Money, kisses, and electric shocks: on the affective psychology of risk. Psychol Sci (2001) 1.35
Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: the role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability. J Pers Soc Psychol (2002) 1.23
Informing women about their breast cancer risks: truth and consequences. Health Commun (2001) 1.13
A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: the impact on self-reported mammography use. Am J Public Health (1999) 1.10
What's time got to do with it? Inattention to duration in interpretation of survival graphs. Risk Anal (2005) 1.03
Risk information exposure and direct-to-consumer genetic testing for BRCA mutations among women with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2009) 0.95
"Is 28% good or bad?" Evaluability and preference reversals in health care decisions. Med Decis Making (2004) 0.91
Mortality versus survival graphs: improving temporal consistency in perceptions of treatment effectiveness. Patient Educ Couns (2006) 0.90
A study of the relationship between family history of breast cancer and knowledge of breast cancer genetic testing prerequisites. Cancer Detect Prev (1999) 0.89
Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses? Am J Obstet Gynecol (2007) 0.84
Risk communication and worry about breast cancer. Psychol Health Med (2003) 0.82
Cancer risk communication in mainstream and ethnic newspapers. Prev Chronic Dis (2008) 0.80
Lying to insurance companies: the desire to deceive among physicians and the public. Am J Bioeth (2004) 8.49
American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care. J Clin Oncol (2009) 6.77
Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Med Decis Making (2007) 4.80
Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees. Ann Intern Med (2009) 4.62
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch Intern Med (2012) 3.79
Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2005) 3.65
Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med (2002) 3.34
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med Decis Making (2007) 2.89
Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res (2005) 2.75
In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 2.71
Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice. Ann Behav Med (2008) 2.69
Gender differences in salary in a recent cohort of early-career physician-researchers. Acad Med (2013) 2.68
Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA (2012) 2.66
Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication. J Natl Cancer Inst (2011) 2.61
When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make? J Gen Intern Med (2003) 2.51
Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Med Decis Making (2005) 2.43
The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns (2008) 2.42
Racial/ethnic disparities in the treatment of localized/regional prostate cancer. J Urol (2004) 2.39
Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires. Med Care (2002) 2.30
Personalized estimates of benefit from preventive care guidelines: a proof of concept. Ann Intern Med (2013) 2.29
Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 2.25
The influence of race, ethnicity, and individual socioeconomic factors on breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Am J Public Health (2006) 2.20
Does competition for transplantable hearts encourage 'gaming' of the waiting list? Health Aff (Millwood) (2004) 2.15
Correlates of between-surgeon variation in breast cancer treatments. Med Care (2006) 2.08
Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care. N Engl J Med (2007) 2.07
Making numbers matter: present and future research in risk communication. Am J Health Behav (2007) 2.05
Why It's Not Time for Health Care Rationing. Hastings Cent Rep (2015) 1.97
Impact of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation policy on the use of high-risk organs for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology (2008) 1.95
Similarities and differences in the career trajectories of male and female career development award recipients. Acad Med (2011) 1.81
Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. Cancer (2005) 1.79
Caregiving behavior is associated with decreased mortality risk. Psychol Sci (2009) 1.76
The role of physicians' recommendations in medical treatment decisions. Med Decis Making (2002) 1.70
Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer. Qual Life Res (2005) 1.67
Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence. J Health Commun (2008) 1.65
The DECISIONS study: a nationwide survey of United States adults regarding 9 common medical decisions. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.63
The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine. Trials (2014) 1.62
Mentor networks in academic medicine: moving beyond a dyadic conception of mentoring for junior faculty researchers. Acad Med (2013) 1.60
Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Educ Couns (2008) 1.60
Patient comprehension of emergency department care and instructions: are patients aware of when they do not understand? Ann Emerg Med (2008) 1.57
Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design. JAMA Pediatr (2013) 1.55
Rethinking the objectives of decision aids: a call for conceptual clarity. Med Decis Making (2007) 1.54
Better off not knowing: improving clinical care by limiting physician access to unsolicited diagnostic information. Arch Intern Med (2011) 1.53
Patterns and correlates of local therapy for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ. J Clin Oncol (2005) 1.53
Influence of "GERD" label on parents' decision to medicate infants. Pediatrics (2013) 1.52
"If I'm better than average, then I'm ok?": Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits. Patient Educ Couns (2007) 1.51
Screening experiments and the use of fractional factorial designs in behavioral intervention research. Am J Public Health (2008) 1.50
Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics. Cancer (2008) 1.50
Context changes choices: a prospective study of the effects of hospitalization on life-sustaining treatment preferences. Med Decis Making (2006) 1.49
Effect of framing as gain versus loss on understanding and hypothetical treatment choices: survival and mortality curves. Med Decis Making (2002) 1.48
Breast cancer treatment experiences of Latinas in Los Angeles County. Am J Public Health (2005) 1.48
Women's decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2010) 1.47
How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey. Patient Educ Couns (2005) 1.47
Support for physician deception of insurance companies among a sample of Philadelphia residents. Ann Intern Med (2003) 1.46
The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics. J Health Commun (2010) 1.45
Stability of older adults' preferences for life-sustaining medical treatment. Health Psychol (2003) 1.45
The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health. Am J Public Health (2009) 1.44
Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2005) 1.44
Continental Divide? The attitudes of US and Canadian oncologists on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and health policies associated with new cancer drugs. J Clin Oncol (2010) 1.40
A matter of perspective: choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions. J Gen Intern Med (2006) 1.39
Work-life balance in academic medicine: narratives of physician-researchers and their mentors. J Gen Intern Med (2013) 1.37
A gift of life: ethical and practical problems with conditional and directed donation. Transplantation (2008) 1.37
Effectiveness of rheumatoid hand surgery: contrasting perceptions of hand surgeons and rheumatologists. J Hand Surg Am (2003) 1.36
Frequency, nature, effects, and correlates of conflicts of interest in published clinical cancer research. Cancer (2009) 1.34
The right tool is what they need, not what we have: a taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication. Med Care Res Rev (2012) 1.34
How does feeling informed relate to being informed? The DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.33
Do unmet expectations for specific tests, referrals, and new medications reduce patients' satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med (2004) 1.32
Mentoring and the career satisfaction of male and female academic medical faculty. Acad Med (2014) 1.31
Misremembering colostomies? Former patients give lower utility ratings than do current patients. Health Psychol (2006) 1.27
Ignorance of hedonic adaptation to hemodialysis: a study using ecological momentary assessment. J Exp Psychol Gen (2005) 1.26
Negotiation in academic medicine: narratives of faculty researchers and their mentors. Acad Med (2013) 1.26
Deficits and variations in patients' experience with making 9 common medical decisions: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.23
Failure to discount for conflict of interest when evaluating medical literature: a randomised trial of physicians. J Med Ethics (2010) 1.22
Clarifying values: an updated review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2013) 1.22
The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2010) 1.21
A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.21
Belief in numbers: When and why women disbelieve tailored breast cancer risk statistics. Patient Educ Couns (2013) 1.20
Risk perception measures' associations with behavior intentions, affect, and cognition following colon cancer screening messages. Health Psychol (2011) 1.20
Under-representation of women in high-impact published clinical cancer research. Cancer (2009) 1.19
Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go? Health Serv Res (2008) 1.19
Does a helping hand mean a heavy heart? Helping behavior and well-being among spouse caregivers. Psychol Aging (2010) 1.17
Surgical management of the rheumatoid hand: consensus and controversy among rheumatologists and hand surgeons. J Rheumatol (2003) 1.16
What is perfect health to an 85-year-old?: evidence for scale recalibration in subjective health ratings. Med Care (2005) 1.16
Women's interest in taking tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: response to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2011) 1.16
Surgeon perspectives about local therapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer (2005) 1.13
Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol (2008) 1.12