Published in J Natl Cancer Inst on September 19, 2011
Digital Outreach Intervention for Lung Cancer Screening (mPATH-Lung) | NCT04083859
The Stroke Riskometer(TM) App: validation of a data collection tool and stroke risk predictor. Int J Stroke (2014) 2.18
Screening mammography in older women: a review. JAMA (2014) 1.70
Presentation of Benefits and Harms in US Cancer Screening and Prevention Guidelines: Systematic Review. J Natl Cancer Inst (2016) 1.42
Lifetime risk of being diagnosed with, or dying from, prostate cancer by major ethnic group in England 2008-2010. BMC Med (2015) 1.41
Women's responses to information about overdiagnosis in the UK breast cancer screening programme: a qualitative study. BMJ Open (2013) 1.27
Clinical outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: a systematic review. Circ Heart Fail (2014) 1.24
Towards environmentally sustainable human behaviour: targeting non-conscious and conscious processes for effective and acceptable policies. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci (2017) 1.08
Delivering patient decision aids on the Internet: definitions, theories, current evidence, and emerging research areas. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2013) 1.00
Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Crit Care Med (2016) 1.00
Estimating and communicating prognosis in advanced neurologic disease. Neurology (2013) 0.96
Core competencies for shared decision making training programs: insights from an international, interdisciplinary working group. J Contin Educ Health Prof (2013) 0.96
Insights from a conference on implementing comparative effectiveness research through shared decision-making. J Comp Eff Res (2013) 0.95
Conveying genomic recurrence risk estimates to patients with early-stage breast cancer: oncologist perspectives. Psychooncology (2013) 0.92
Does Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing and Counseling Reduce Modifiable Risk Factors? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Veterans. J Gen Intern Med (2015) 0.92
Prosthetic aortic valve selection: current patient experience, preferences and knowledge. Open Heart (2015) 0.92
Development of a decision aid to inform patients' and families' renal replacement therapy selection decisions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2012) 0.90
A Kenyan newspaper analysis of the limitations of voluntary medical male circumcision and the importance of sustained condom use. BMC Public Health (2012) 0.90
Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2013) 0.84
Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care. Rev Hum Factors Ergon (2013) 0.84
Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use. Clin Obstet Gynecol (2014) 0.84
Effects of racial and ethnic group and health literacy on responses to genomic risk information in a medically underserved population. Health Psychol (2015) 0.82
The design of a low literacy decision aid about rheumatoid arthritis medications developed in three languages for use during the clinical encounter. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2014) 0.81
Development and validation of a personalized, web-based decision aid for lung cancer screening using mixed methods: a study protocol. JMIR Res Protoc (2014) 0.81
Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes. Public Health Genomics (2014) 0.81
Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda. Acad Emerg Med (2016) 0.81
Reasons for inpatients not to seek clarity at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Pretoria. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med (2014) 0.80
Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of N1 non-small cell lung cancer: differential impact of new evidence on physician and patient decisions. J Thorac Dis (2015) 0.80
Pilot test of a patient decision aid about liver transplant organ quality. Liver Transpl (2014) 0.80
APOE-related risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia for prevention trials: An analysis of four cohorts. PLoS Med (2017) 0.79
Patient and physician views on providing cancer patient-specific survival information. Laryngoscope (2013) 0.79
The National Vaccine Advisory Committee: reducing patient and provider barriers to maternal immunizations: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on June 11, 2014. Public Health Rep (2015) 0.79
Examining Associations between Health Information Seeking Behavior and Adult Education Status in the U.S.: An Analysis of the 2012 PIAAC Data. PLoS One (2016) 0.79
Distress and patient-centered communication among veterans with incidental (not screen-detected) pulmonary nodules. A cohort study. Ann Am Thorac Soc (2015) 0.79
Understanding and Communicating Medical Risks for Living Kidney Donors: A Matter of Perspective. J Am Soc Nephrol (2016) 0.78
Assessment of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies in oncology: summary of the oncology risk evaluation and mitigation strategies workshop. J Oncol Pract (2013) 0.78
'I still don't know diddly': a longitudinal qualitative study of patients' knowledge and distress while undergoing evaluation of incidental pulmonary nodules. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med (2015) 0.78
Quantifying Treatment Benefit in Molecular Subgroups to Assess a Predictive Biomarker. Clin Cancer Res (2016) 0.78
Social comparison framing in health news and its effect on perceptions of group risk. Health Commun (2013) 0.77
Adult childhood cancer survivors' narratives of managing their health: the unexpected and the unresolved. J Cancer Surviv (2016) 0.77
Information Mismatch: Cancer Risk Counseling with Diverse Underserved Patients. J Genet Couns (2017) 0.76
Informed Choice for Participation in Down Syndrome Screening: Development and Content of a Web-Based Decision Aid. JMIR Res Protoc (2015) 0.76
General Practitioners and Breast Surgeons in France, Germany, Netherlands and the UK show variable breast cancer risk communication profiles. BMC Cancer (2015) 0.76
Prevention of stroke: a strategic global imperative. Nat Rev Neurol (2016) 0.76
The Italian stroke-app: ICTUS3R. Neurol Sci (2016) 0.75
A Patient-Centered Approach to Clinical Practice Guidelines in Otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2014) 0.75
Other Ways of Knowing. Med Decis Making (2016) 0.75
Facilitating informed decisions about breast cancer screening: development and evaluation of a web-based decision aid for women in their 40s. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2017) 0.75
Persuasive Interventions for Controversial Cancer Screening Recommendations: Testing a Novel Approach to Help Patients Make Evidence-Based Decisions. Ann Fam Med (2017) 0.75
Recurrence risk perception and quality of life following treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2016) 0.75
How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open (2016) 0.75
Acceptability of the Cytosponge procedure for detecting Barrett's oesophagus: a qualitative study. BMJ Open (2017) 0.75
Predicting Adverse Health Outcomes in Long-Term Survivors of a Childhood Cancer. Children (Basel) (2014) 0.75
Perspectives of Maryland adults regarding caries prevention. Am J Public Health (2015) 0.75
Performance of models for estimating absolute risk difference in multicenter trials with binary outcome. BMC Med Res Methodol (2016) 0.75
Accuracy of information about the intrauterine device on the Internet. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2015) 0.75
I'd Do Anything for Research, But I Won't Do That: Interest in Pharmacological Interventions in Older Adults Enrolled in a Longitudinal Aging Study. PLoS One (2016) 0.75
Statins for primary prevention in people with a 10% 10-year cardiovascular risk: too much medicine too soon? Br J Gen Pract (2017) 0.75
Patient educational technologies and their use by patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. BMC Health Serv Res (2015) 0.75
Shared Medical Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening: Experienced versus Descriptive Risk Formats. Med Decis Making (2015) 0.75
The impact of numeracy on verbatim knowledge of the longitudinal risk for prostate cancer recurrence following radiation therapy. Med Decis Making (2014) 0.75
Patient Preferences for Attributes of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Medications in Germany and Spain: An Online Discrete-Choice Experiment Survey. Diabetes Ther (2017) 0.75
Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study. Glob Qual Nurs Res (2017) 0.75
People's Understanding of Verbal Risk Descriptors in Patient Information Leaflets: A Cross-Sectional National Survey of 18- to 65-Year-Olds in England. Drug Saf (2017) 0.75
Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease through population-wide motivational strategies: insights from using smartphones in stroke prevention. BMJ Glob Health (2017) 0.75
Expanded carrier screening: what determines intended participation and can this be influenced by message framing and narrative information? Eur J Hum Genet (2017) 0.75
Preferences for breast cancer risk reduction among BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: a discrete-choice experiment. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2017) 0.75
Parental optimism about childhood obesity-related disease risks. Int J Obes (Lond) (2017) 0.75
Knowledge and understanding of health insurance: challenges and remedies. Isr J Health Policy Res (2017) 0.75
Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst (1989) 19.87
General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making (2001) 7.83
Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Am J Med (1992) 6.68
Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2001) 6.23
The framing effect of relative and absolute risk. J Gen Intern Med (1993) 4.87
Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ (2002) 4.63
The visual communication of risk. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (1999) 4.24
Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Med Decis Making (2007) 3.74
Completeness of reporting trial results: effect on physicians' willingness to prescribe. Lancet (1994) 3.65
Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Acad Med (1998) 3.41
Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Med Care Res Rev (2007) 3.24
Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care. Med Decis Making (2001) 2.90
Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res (2005) 2.75
Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2006) 2.73
Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2007) 2.73
A randomized comparison of patients' understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats. J Gen Intern Med (2003) 2.49
Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Med Decis Making (2005) 2.43
The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns (2008) 2.42
Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions. Med Decis Making (2007) 2.34
A meta-analysis of the effects of presenting treatment benefits in different formats. Med Decis Making (2007) 2.29
Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisions. Med Decis Making (2007) 1.73
Patient education materials about the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer: a critical review. Ann Intern Med (2004) 1.71
Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: how presentation of recurrence risk influences decision-making. J Clin Oncol (2003) 1.67
Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence. J Health Commun (2008) 1.65
Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Educ Couns (2008) 1.60
Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.54
"If I'm better than average, then I'm ok?": Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits. Patient Educ Couns (2007) 1.51
Complex interventions to improve the health of people with limited literacy: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns (2009) 1.50
Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics. Cancer (2008) 1.50
The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics. J Health Commun (2010) 1.45
Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2005) 1.44
Absolute and comparative risk perceptions as predictors of cancer worry: moderating effects of gender and psychological distress. J Health Commun (2006) 1.44
Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: the role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability. J Pers Soc Psychol (2002) 1.23
The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2010) 1.21
A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.21
A test of numeric formats for communicating risk probabilities. Med Decis Making (2008) 1.19
Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect? Med Decis Making (2010) 1.17
Women's interest in taking tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: response to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2011) 1.16
Testing whether decision aids introduce cognitive biases: results of a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns (2009) 1.04
What's time got to do with it? Inattention to duration in interpretation of survival graphs. Risk Anal (2005) 1.03
"Is 28% good or bad?" Evaluability and preference reversals in health care decisions. Med Decis Making (2004) 0.91
Mortality versus survival graphs: improving temporal consistency in perceptions of treatment effectiveness. Patient Educ Couns (2006) 0.90
Lying to insurance companies: the desire to deceive among physicians and the public. Am J Bioeth (2004) 8.49
American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care. J Clin Oncol (2009) 6.77
Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Med Decis Making (2007) 4.80
Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees. Ann Intern Med (2009) 4.62
Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves. Arch Intern Med (2011) 3.43
Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med (2002) 3.34
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med Decis Making (2007) 2.89
Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study). Arch Intern Med (2009) 2.82
In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 2.71
Gender differences in salary in a recent cohort of early-career physician-researchers. Acad Med (2013) 2.68
Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA (2012) 2.66
The role of clinical uncertainty in treatment decisions for diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. Ann Intern Med (2008) 2.55
When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make? J Gen Intern Med (2003) 2.51
Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Med Decis Making (2005) 2.43
An online community improves adherence in an internet-mediated walking program. Part 1: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res (2010) 2.43
Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires. Med Care (2002) 2.30
Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates. J Genet Couns (2012) 2.25
Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 2.25
Does competition for transplantable hearts encourage 'gaming' of the waiting list? Health Aff (Millwood) (2004) 2.15
Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care. N Engl J Med (2007) 2.07
Making numbers matter: present and future research in risk communication. Am J Health Behav (2007) 2.05
Can patients use test results effectively if they have direct access? BMJ (2015) 2.02
Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2013) 1.99
Why It's Not Time for Health Care Rationing. Hastings Cent Rep (2015) 1.97
Impact of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation policy on the use of high-risk organs for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology (2008) 1.95
Similarities and differences in the career trajectories of male and female career development award recipients. Acad Med (2011) 1.81
Caregiving behavior is associated with decreased mortality risk. Psychol Sci (2009) 1.76
The role of physicians' recommendations in medical treatment decisions. Med Decis Making (2002) 1.70
Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence. J Health Commun (2008) 1.65
The DECISIONS study: a nationwide survey of United States adults regarding 9 common medical decisions. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.63
The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine. Trials (2014) 1.62
Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.61
Mentor networks in academic medicine: moving beyond a dyadic conception of mentoring for junior faculty researchers. Acad Med (2013) 1.60
Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Educ Couns (2008) 1.60
Patient comprehension of emergency department care and instructions: are patients aware of when they do not understand? Ann Emerg Med (2008) 1.57
Patient-provider concordance in the prioritization of health conditions among hypertensive diabetes patients. J Gen Intern Med (2010) 1.55
Rethinking the objectives of decision aids: a call for conceptual clarity. Med Decis Making (2007) 1.54
Better off not knowing: improving clinical care by limiting physician access to unsolicited diagnostic information. Arch Intern Med (2011) 1.53
Influence of "GERD" label on parents' decision to medicate infants. Pediatrics (2013) 1.52
"If I'm better than average, then I'm ok?": Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits. Patient Educ Couns (2007) 1.51
Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics. Cancer (2008) 1.50
Effect of framing as gain versus loss on understanding and hypothetical treatment choices: survival and mortality curves. Med Decis Making (2002) 1.48
Women's decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2010) 1.47
How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey. Patient Educ Couns (2005) 1.47
Support for physician deception of insurance companies among a sample of Philadelphia residents. Ann Intern Med (2003) 1.46
The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics. J Health Commun (2010) 1.45
The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health. Am J Public Health (2009) 1.44
Continental Divide? The attitudes of US and Canadian oncologists on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and health policies associated with new cancer drugs. J Clin Oncol (2010) 1.40
A matter of perspective: choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions. J Gen Intern Med (2006) 1.39
Work-life balance in academic medicine: narratives of physician-researchers and their mentors. J Gen Intern Med (2013) 1.37
A gift of life: ethical and practical problems with conditional and directed donation. Transplantation (2008) 1.37
Effectiveness of rheumatoid hand surgery: contrasting perceptions of hand surgeons and rheumatologists. J Hand Surg Am (2003) 1.36
Frequency, nature, effects, and correlates of conflicts of interest in published clinical cancer research. Cancer (2009) 1.34
How does feeling informed relate to being informed? The DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.33
Do unmet expectations for specific tests, referrals, and new medications reduce patients' satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med (2004) 1.32
Mentoring and the career satisfaction of male and female academic medical faculty. Acad Med (2014) 1.31
Misremembering colostomies? Former patients give lower utility ratings than do current patients. Health Psychol (2006) 1.27
Ignorance of hedonic adaptation to hemodialysis: a study using ecological momentary assessment. J Exp Psychol Gen (2005) 1.26
Negotiation in academic medicine: narratives of faculty researchers and their mentors. Acad Med (2013) 1.26
Deficits and variations in patients' experience with making 9 common medical decisions: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.23
Failure to discount for conflict of interest when evaluating medical literature: a randomised trial of physicians. J Med Ethics (2010) 1.22
The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2010) 1.21
All stories are not alike: a purpose-, content-, and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids. Med Decis Making (2012) 1.21
A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.21
Belief in numbers: When and why women disbelieve tailored breast cancer risk statistics. Patient Educ Couns (2013) 1.20
Risk perception measures' associations with behavior intentions, affect, and cognition following colon cancer screening messages. Health Psychol (2011) 1.20
Under-representation of women in high-impact published clinical cancer research. Cancer (2009) 1.19
Does a helping hand mean a heavy heart? Helping behavior and well-being among spouse caregivers. Psychol Aging (2010) 1.17
Surgical management of the rheumatoid hand: consensus and controversy among rheumatologists and hand surgeons. J Rheumatol (2003) 1.16
Women's interest in taking tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: response to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2011) 1.16
Patients' knowledge about 9 common health conditions: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.16
Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol (2008) 1.12
Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%. Patient Educ Couns (2010) 1.11
Interest in BRCA1/2 testing in a primary care population. Prev Med (2002) 1.10
Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Soc Sci Med (2010) 1.10
Why are you calling me? How study introductions change response patterns. Qual Life Res (2006) 1.09
Presenting research risks and benefits to parents: does format matter? Anesth Analg (2010) 1.09
Are subjective well-being measures any better than decision utility measures? Health Econ Policy Law (2008) 1.08
Sensitivity to disgust, stigma, and adjustment to life with a colostomy. J Res Pers (2007) 1.05
Patient decision making about organ quality in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl (2011) 1.04
Testing whether decision aids introduce cognitive biases: results of a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns (2009) 1.04
What's time got to do with it? Inattention to duration in interpretation of survival graphs. Risk Anal (2005) 1.03
The impact of considering adaptation in health state valuation. Soc Sci Med (2005) 1.03
Batting 300 is good: perspectives of faculty researchers and their mentors on rejection, resilience, and persistence in academic medical careers. Acad Med (2013) 1.02
Using Behavioral Economics to Design Physician Incentives That Deliver High-Value Care. Ann Intern Med (2015) 1.01
Physicians' preferences for active-controlled versus placebo-controlled trials of new antihypertensive drugs. J Gen Intern Med (2002) 1.01
Plans to stop cancer screening tests among adults who recently considered screening. J Gen Intern Med (2010) 1.01
What's it worth? Public willingness to pay to avoid mental illnesses compared with general medical illnesses. Psychiatr Serv (2012) 1.00
Health, wealth, and happiness: financial resources buffer subjective well-being after the onset of a disability. Psychol Sci (2005) 1.00
Controversy undermines support for state mandates on the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Aff (Millwood) (2010) 1.00
The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vaccination debate. Vaccine (2011) 0.99
Individualized survival curves improve satisfaction with cancer risk management decisions in women with BRCA1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol (2005) 0.99