How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US.

US IRBs confronting research in the developing world. Dev World Bioeth (2012) 1.83

Institutional review board community members: who are they, what do they do, and whom do they represent? Acad Med (2012) 1.78

How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence. J Med Ethics (2012) 1.66

"Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest. PLoS One (2011) 1.63

The Myth of Community Differences as the Cause of Variations Among IRBs. AJOB Prim Res (2011) 1.59

Views and experiences of IRBs concerning research integrity. J Law Med Ethics (2011) 1.58

The ethics police?: IRBs' views concerning their power. PLoS One (2011) 1.37

Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand. PLoS One (2014) 1.16

Research ethics. To protect human subjects, review what was done, not proposed. Science (2012) 1.06

Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research. Korean J Anesthesiol (2012) 1.02

Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science. J Med Internet Res (2016) 0.87

From anonymity to "open doors": IRB responses to tensions with researchers. BMC Res Notes (2012) 0.83

Local IRBs vs. federal agencies: shifting dynamics, systems, and relationships. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2012) 0.83

How IRB leaders view and approach challenges raised by industry-funded research. IRB (2013) 0.82

Views of IRBs Concerning their Local Ecologies: Perceptions of Relationships, Systems, and Tensions between IRBs and their Institutions. AJOB Prim Res (2013) 0.81

How IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2013) 0.81

Protecting clinical trial participants and protecting data integrity: are we meeting the challenges? PLoS Med (2012) 0.80

Ethics Review for a Multi-Site Project Involving Tribal Nations in the Northern Plains. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2016) 0.79

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions. Ann Fam Med (2015) 0.77

How IRBs view and make decisions about social risks. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2013) 0.75

Exclusion of Women of Childbearing Potential in Clinical Trials of Type 2 Diabetes Medications: A Review of Protocol-Based Barriers to Enrollment. Diabetes Care (2016) 0.75

Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Med Etika Bioet (2005) 17.18

A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials. N Engl J Med (2002) 4.53

Costs and benefits of the national cancer institute central institutional review board. J Clin Oncol (2009) 4.39

The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review. N Engl J Med (2010) 3.36

A survey of IRB process in 68 U.S. hospitals. J Nurs Scholarsh (2004) 2.29

A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval. J Clin Epidemiol (2006) 2.14

US IRBs confronting research in the developing world. Dev World Bioeth (2012) 1.83

Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees. J Med Ethics (1996) 1.79

Views and experiences of IRBs concerning research integrity. J Law Med Ethics (2011) 1.58

Impact of recent legislative bills regarding clinical research on Italian ethics committee activity. J Med Ethics (2008) 1.18

The process of deciding about prophylactic surgery for breast and ovarian cancer: Patient questions, uncertainties, and communication. Am J Med Genet A (2010) 1.03

Regulating research with human subjects--is the system broken? Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc (2005) 0.99

Challenges and changes in spirituality among doctors who become patients. Soc Sci Med (2005) 0.99

Views and approaches toward risks and benefits among doctors who become patients. Patient Educ Couns (2006) 0.97

Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity. J Med Ethics (2006) 0.95

Impact of EU clinical trial directive. Eur J Cancer (2001) 0.93

Medical schools' attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of central institutional review boards. Acad Med (2004) 0.89

Ethics Committee or Community? Examining the identity of Czech Ethics Committees in the period of transition. J Med Ethics (2010) 0.86