How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence.

An Ethical Exploration of Barriers to Research on Controlled Drugs. Am J Bioeth (2016) 5.77

Incentives to participate in clinical trials: practical and ethical considerations. Am J Emerg Med (2015) 1.38

How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies. J Med Ethics (2013) 0.77

Challenges to be overcome using population-based sampling methods to recruit veterans for a study of post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Res Methodol (2014) 0.77

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based pain self-management intervention for patients undergoing total hip replacement: feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial. Trials (2014) 0.76

How IRBs make decisions: should we worry if they disagree? J Med Ethics (2012) 0.75

Unconventional combinations of prospective parents: ethical challenges faced by IVF providers. BMC Med Ethics (2017) 0.75

Bioethical Issues in Providing Financial Incentives to Research Participants. Medicoleg Bioeth (2015) 0.75

Barriers to Effective Deliberation in Clinical Research Oversight. HEC Forum (2016) 0.75

What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med (1999) 6.44

Nazi science--the Dachau hypothermia experiments. N Engl J Med (1990) 3.23

Coercion in psychiatric care: systematic review of correlates and themes. Psychiatr Serv (2011) 2.10

How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US. BMC Med Ethics (2011) 1.87

US IRBs confronting research in the developing world. Dev World Bioeth (2012) 1.83

Institutional review board community members: who are they, what do they do, and whom do they represent? Acad Med (2012) 1.78

"Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest. PLoS One (2011) 1.63

The Myth of Community Differences as the Cause of Variations Among IRBs. AJOB Prim Res (2011) 1.59

Views and experiences of IRBs concerning research integrity. J Law Med Ethics (2011) 1.58

Ending concerns about undue inducement. J Law Med Ethics (2004) 1.55

Payment for research participation: a coercive offer? J Med Ethics (2008) 1.52

The ethics police?: IRBs' views concerning their power. PLoS One (2011) 1.37

Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants. IRB (2012) 1.29

Disclosure of information to potential subjects on research recruitment web sites. IRB (2008) 1.11

Voluntariness of consent to research: a preliminary empirical investigation. IRB (2009) 1.06

Uses of coercion in addiction treatment: clinical aspects. Am J Addict (2008) 1.04

Misconceptions about coercion and undue influence: reflections on the views of IRB members. Bioethics (2012) 1.00

The reporting of monetary compensation in research articles. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2007) 0.98

Coercive offers and research participation: a comment on Wertheimer and Miller. J Med Ethics (2010) 0.85