Published in Clin Orthop Relat Res on February 01, 2012
Patient-level improvements in pain and activities of daily living after total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford) (2013) 1.41
Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015) 0.90
Return to Sports and Physical Activity After Total and Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med (2016) 0.86
What Sport Activity Levels Are Achieved in Patients After Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for a Proximal Femur Bone Sarcoma? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2016) 0.86
Participation following knee replacement: the MOST cohort study. Phys Ther (2013) 0.84
Can patients return to high-impact physical activities after hip resurfacing? A prospective study. Int Orthop (2013) 0.83
Total hip and knee replacement in the mature athlete. Sports Health (2014) 0.80
Activity levels and participation in physical activities by Korean patients following total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2014) 0.79
Gender Differences in Wear Rates for 28- vs 32-mm Ceramic Femoral Heads on Modern Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene at Midterm Follow-Up in Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2015) 0.79
Why Patients Do Not Participate in Sports Activities After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthop J Sports Med (2015) 0.75
Sports activities after total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev (2017) 0.75
Comparing return to sport activities after short metaphyseal femoral arthroplasty with resurfacing and big femoral head arthroplasties. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2017) 0.75
The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care (1992) 144.02
Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol (1988) 35.68
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1996) 7.44
The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1972) 5.18
Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty (1998) 3.35
Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2004) 3.33
Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 3.13
Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 3.05
Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1984) 2.77
Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol (1997) 2.62
The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 2.09
Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 2.08
Metal-on-Metal total hip replacement: what does the literature say? J Arthroplasty (2005) 1.90
Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 1.74
Total hip arthroplasty with use of the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation. Four to seven-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2000) 1.58
Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 1.55
Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1999) 1.55
Long-term follow-up of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J Orthop Res (2007) 1.48
Sports after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med (2007) 1.32
In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996) 1.29
Sports activities 5 years after total knee or hip arthroplasty: the Ulm Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis (2005) 1.27
The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1999) 1.25
Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med (2007) 1.20
What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 1.18
Metal-on-metal bearings in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2004) 1.15
Participation in sports after total knee replacement. Am J Sports Med (1998) 1.14
Activity level in young patients with primary total hip arthroplasty: a 5-year minimum follow-up. J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.13
Physical activity after total joint replacement: a cross-sectional survey. Clin J Sport Med (2007) 1.12
The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2006) 1.12
Return to sport after joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 1.11
The Metasul metal-on-metal articulation in primary total hip replacement: clinical and radiological results at ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 1.10
An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty (2004) 1.09
Effect of total hip arthroplasty on recreational and sporting activity. ANZ J Surg (2004) 1.08
Patient-reported activity level after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2008) 1.07
Engineering issues and wear performance of metal on metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996) 1.04
Twenty-year results of McKee-Farrar versus Charnley prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996) 1.01
Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing: laboratory studies and analysis of retrievals. J Arthroplasty (2004) 0.99
High-impact sports after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2008) 0.96
Medium-term results of a modern metal-on-metal system in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2000) 0.96
Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee (2006) 0.95
Metal on metal total hip replacement workshop consensus document. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996) 0.94
The Nicolas Andry award: comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996) 0.87
Cobalt chromium molybdenum metal combination for modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996) 0.86
The Miller-Galante knee prosthesis for the treatment of osteoarthrosis. A comparison of the results of partial fixation with cement and fixation without any cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1993) 0.86
Metal-on-metal total hip joint replacement: a minimum follow-up of five years. Hip Int (2009) 0.84
The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2009) 2.83
Giant cell tumor of long bone: a Canadian Sarcoma Group study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2002) 2.60
Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2009) 2.47
The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 2.11
Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 1.84
Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 1.84
Cementless two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infection after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.77
The natural history of inflammatory pseudotumors in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 1.60
Adverse local tissue reaction associated with a modular hip hemiarthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 1.58
Effect of sociodemographic factors on surgical consultations and hip or knee replacements among patients with osteoarthritis in British Columbia, Canada. J Rheumatol (2010) 1.57
Prevalence of pseudotumor in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2011) 1.52
Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 1.48
Evaluating function and health related quality of life in patients treated for extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res (2006) 1.48
High complication rate after revision of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 1.38
Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 1.37
Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 1.32
Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 1.30
Two-stage total hip arthroplasty: how often does it control methicillin-resistant infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 1.30
Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2009) 1.25
Classification systems in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2004) 1.24
Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am (2004) 1.24
Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2007) 1.23
Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 1.21
Removal of solidly fixed implants during revision hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2005) 1.17
Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 1.17
Hip prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement for the treatment of infections following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 1.14
Osteoblast-derived factors induce androgen-independent proliferation and expression of prostate-specific antigen in human prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res (2004) 1.13
Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 1.12
The infected total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect (2003) 1.07
Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am (2004) 1.07
The John Charnley Award: Diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus ultrasound for detecting pseudotumors in asymptomatic metal-on-metal THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 1.05
Trochanteric osteotomies in revision total hip arthroplasty: contemporary techniques and results. Instr Course Lect (2005) 1.03
Quality of life outcomes in revision vs primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.02
To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 1.01
High survival of modular tapered stems for proximal femoral bone defects at 5 to 10 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 0.99
Delays worsen quality of life outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 0.98
Total hip arthroplasty in steroid-induced osteonecrosis: early functional and radiological outcomes. Can J Surg (2013) 0.98
Evaluation of pain in patients with apparently solidly fixed total hip arthroplasty components. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2002) 0.96
Periacetabular osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty in patients older than 40 years. J Arthroplasty (2008) 0.96
Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing. Comput Aided Surg (2006) 0.96
Quality of life outcomes in revision versus primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.95
Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 0.95