Published in Bone Joint J on January 01, 2013
Patients' Views on Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Focus-group Study | NCT03064334
The utility of outcome measures in total knee replacement surgery. Int J Rheumatol (2013) 1.09
Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop (2015) 1.05
Do Psychological Factors Predict Poor Outcome in Patients Undergoing TKA? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015) 0.91
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables near normal gait at higher speeds, unlike total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2013) 0.88
What clinical characteristics and radiographic parameters are associated with patellofemoral instability after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop (2016) 0.81
Magnetic resonance analysis of loaded meniscus deformation: a novel technique comparing participants with and without radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Skeletal Radiol (2014) 0.80
Predictors of Patient-Reported Pain and Functional Outcomes Over 10 Years After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Arthroplasty (2016) 0.79
Preoperative predictors of postoperative opioid usage, pain scores, and referral to a pain management service in total knee arthroplasty. HSS J (2014) 0.78
Functional Evaluation in High Energy (Schatzker Type V and Type VI) Tibial Plateau Fractures Treated by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. Int Sch Res Notices (2014) 0.75
Morbidity index: A score to assess immediate postoperative recovery in TKR patients. J Orthop (2015) 0.75
Patient participation in postoperative care activities in patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery: Multimedia Intervention for Managing patient Experience (MIME). Study protocol for a cluster randomised crossover trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2016) 0.75
Factors preventing kneeling in a group of pre-educated patients post total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol (2016) 0.75
Open Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy: Accuracy of Correction and Patient Outcomes. HSS J (2016) 0.75
Patient reported outcomes in three hundred and twenty eight bilateral total knee replacement cases (simultaneous versus staged arthroplasty) using the Oxford Knee Score. Int Orthop (2016) 0.75
Heparin and Vascular Occlusion. Can Med Assoc J (1936) 6.87
Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 5.48
The premature failure of the Charnley Elite-Plus stem: a confirmation of RSA predictions. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2006) 3.29
Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2009) 2.97
Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2009) 2.95
Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 2.79
Designer hips. BMJ (1993) 2.65
The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2006) 2.49
A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 2.35
Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2001) 2.31
Obesity in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 2.29
Diagnostic value of intra-articular anaesthetic in primary osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1998) 2.17
Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre: a randomised blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 2.12
The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 2.09
Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 2.09
Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2011) 1.85
Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems. J Arthroplasty (2001) 1.72
Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2011) 1.67
Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 1.66
Efficacy of an accelerated recovery protocol for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty--a randomised controlled trial. Knee (2005) 1.65
Avascular necrosis associated with fracture of the femoral neck after hip resurfacing: histological assessment of femoral bone from retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 1.65
Radio-opaque agents in bone cement increase bone resorption. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1997) 1.63
Recent advances in venous thromboembolic prophylaxis during and after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2000) 1.61
A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2003) 1.60
Pain levels after total hip replacement: their use as endpoints for survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1997) 1.59
Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991 to 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 1.57
Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2004) 1.55
The influence of surgical approach on cemented stem stability: an RSA study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 1.50
Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 1.49
Accident and emergency doctors lack proper training in trauma. BMJ (1995) 1.49
Necrotic granulomatous pseudotumours in bilateral resurfacing hip arthoplasties: evidence for a type IV immune response. Virchows Arch (2008) 1.46
The effect of hip resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 1.45
Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J (2013) 1.43
GONOCOCCAL TENOSYNOVITIS OF THE HAND. Can Med Assoc J (1935) 1.39
Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty (2001) 1.38
The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 1.33
Direct detection of groups A, C and G streptococci in clinical specimens by a trivalent colour test. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis (1988) 1.31
Stimulation of TNF-alpha release in monocytes by honey. Cytokine (2001) 1.30
Mutation detection rate and spectrum in familial hypercholesterolaemia patients in the UK pilot cascade project. Clin Genet (2010) 1.29
Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2012) 1.22
Human arthroplasty derived macrophages differentiate into osteoclastic bone resorbing cells. Ann Rheum Dis (1997) 1.18
Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2007) 1.15
Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on invasive plants: comparison of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L. and C. esculentus L.). J Environ Qual (2008) 1.15
Clinical experience of patellar fracture fixation using metal wire or non-absorbable polyester--a study of 37 cases. Injury (2001) 1.14
Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. A radiological assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2002) 1.14
The length of the patellar tendon after unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1999) 1.12
Cement migration after THR. A comparison of charnley elite and exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1999) 1.12
The incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement and its relationship to outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2009) 1.11
Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2007) 1.10
The effect of an intravenous bolus of tranexamic acid on blood loss in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2009) 1.10
Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2011) 1.10
The Metasul metal-on-metal articulation in primary total hip replacement: clinical and radiological results at ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 1.10
The relationship between obesity and the age at which hip and knee replacement is undertaken. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 1.09
Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after 'Oxford' medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1999) 1.08
Spontaneous non-gastrointestinal bleeding associated with diclofenac. Lancet (1990) 1.08
Hamstrings vs. patella tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial. Knee (2001) 1.08
Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect (2001) 1.07
Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 1.07
Genetic influences in the aetiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a sibling study. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 1.06
The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements. Bone Joint J (2013) 1.05
Total hip replacement: indications for surgery and risk factors for failure. Ann Rheum Dis (1997) 1.04
Learning and retaining simulated arthroscopic meniscal repair skills. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2012) 1.04
Femoral offset is underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis but accurately assessed on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2012) 1.04
One- or two-stage bilateral total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty (1999) 1.03
The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2007) 1.03
The effect of particle phagocytosis and metallic wear particles on osteoclast formation and bone resorption in vitro. J Arthroplasty (2000) 1.03
Errors in measurement of acetabular index. J Pediatr Orthop (1996) 1.01
Radiological changes five years after unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2000) 1.01
A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery. Qual Life Res (2004) 1.01
Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2009) 1.01
Mobile bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee (2009) 1.01
Polyethylene wear in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval study of 47 bearings. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 1.00
Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2006) 1.00
Survival analysis in joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1993) 0.99
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect antibodies in gonorrhea using whole cells. J Clin Pathol (1981) 0.99
The trainer, the trainee and the surgeons' assistant: clinical outcomes following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2009) 0.99
The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2007) 0.99
Analysis of antibodies in local and disseminated Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections by means of gel electrophoresis-derived ELISA. Immunology (1982) 0.98
A novel coloured latex test for the detection and identification of more than one antigen. J Immunol Methods (1987) 0.98
Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) (2007) 0.98
What is a good patient reported outcome after total hip replacement? Osteoarthritis Cartilage (2010) 0.98
Ten-year in vivo wear measurement of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 0.97
Accelerated recovery for unicompartmental knee replacement--a feasibility study. Knee (2002) 0.97
Arthroplasty implant biomaterial particle associated macrophages differentiate into lacunar bone resorbing cells. Ann Rheum Dis (1996) 0.97
Tibial component overhang following unicompartmental knee replacement--does it matter? Knee (2009) 0.97
Embolism in Peripheral Arteries. Can Med Assoc J (1936) 0.97