Quality metrics in endoscopy.

PubWeight™: 0.78‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 3977641)

Published in Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) on April 01, 2013

Authors

Suryakanth R Gurudu1, Francisco C Ramirez1

Author Affiliations

1: Dr. Gurudu is an Associate Professor of Medicine and Dr. Ramirez is a Professor of Medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Articles citing this

Risk of colon perforation during colonoscopy at Baylor University Medical Center. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) (2015) 0.75

Articles cited by this

The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA (1988) 24.47

Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med (2000) 13.21

Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med (2010) 11.76

Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med (2000) 6.84

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 6.51

International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med (2010) 6.36

Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med (2005) 5.88

Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2002) 5.47

Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology (2007) 4.37

The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 4.36

Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology (2005) 4.31

Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol (2000) 4.17

Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology (2010) 3.91

Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training. Ann Intern Med (1993) 2.92

Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med (1996) 2.83

Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2008) 2.73

Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 2.60

Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 2.41

Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc (2000) 2.26

Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries. Cancer (2011) 2.01

A prospective study of the prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk. Am J Gastroenterol (1990) 2.01

Survival of colorectal cancer patients hospitalized in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Am J Gastroenterol (2003) 1.68

Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 1.64

Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.62

Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.61

Training resident physicians in fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy. How many supervised examinations are required to achieve competence? Am J Med (1986) 1.50

Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.46

Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.42

The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc (1993) 1.40

Intensive training over 5 days improves colonoscopy skills long-term. Endoscopy (2007) 1.36

Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.32

Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.25

Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2009) 1.24

Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 1.22

Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy? Endoscopy (2002) 1.13

Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.03

Measuring procedural skills. Ann Intern Med (1996) 1.03

Assessment of technical competence during ERCP training. Gastrointest Endosc (1996) 1.01

Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 0.99

Quality indicators for endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 0.94

Quality, competency and endosonography. Endoscopy (2006) 0.91

Use of video and magnetic endoscope imaging for rating competence at colonoscopy: validation of a measurement tool. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 0.90

Colonoscopy training--new approaches, old problems. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am (2005) 0.89

Simulator training for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am (2006) 0.83

The ERCP quality network: a pilot study of benchmarking practice and performance. Am J Med Qual (2012) 0.82

The role of endoscopic therapy in the management of variceal hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 0.77