Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials.

Observational studies: getting clear about transparency. PLoS Med (2014) 1.64

Statistical and methodological considerations for reporting RCTs in medical literature. Korean J Anesthesiol (2015) 1.48

Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting. BMJ Open (2015) 1.14

Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence. Trials (2014) 0.82

Core outcome sets and trial registries. Trials (2015) 0.82

Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews. PLoS One (2015) 0.80

Clinical trials: subgroup analyses in randomized trials--more rigour needed. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2015) 0.77

A living document: reincarnating the research article. Trials (2015) 0.77

Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study. BMJ Open (2016) 0.77

Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort study. BMJ Open (2015) 0.77

Published and unpublished evidence in coverage decision-making for pharmaceuticals in Europe: existing approaches and way forward. Health Res Policy Syst (2016) 0.75

Agreements and Discrepancies between FDA Reports and Journal Papers on Biologic Agents Approved for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Research Project. PLoS One (2016) 0.75

The quality of reporting methods and results of cost-effectiveness analyses in Spain: a methodological systematic review. Syst Rev (2016) 0.75

Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients. Trials (2017) 0.75

Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey. PLoS One (2016) 0.75

Clinical research data sharing: what an open science world means for researchers involved in evidence synthesis. Syst Rev (2016) 0.75

Increasing the evidence base in journalology: creating an international best practice journal research network. BMC Med (2016) 0.75

Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study. Syst Rev (2016) 0.75

State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open (2017) 0.75

Responsible Translation of Stem Cell Research: An Assessment of Clinical Trial Registration and Publications. Stem Cell Reports (2017) 0.75

Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review. PLoS One (2017) 0.75

Effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of primary gastric cancer in healthy asymptomatic people: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing risk ratio with risk difference. PLoS One (2017) 0.75

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open (2017) 0.75

Core outcome sets for research and clinical practice. Braz J Phys Ther (2017) 0.75

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 22.34

Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med (2008) 19.86

Statistics in medicine--reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med (2007) 12.55

Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet (2000) 9.80

SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med (2013) 8.21

Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications. BMJ (2003) 7.78

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess (2010) 5.11

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA (2010) 4.56

Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. BMJ (2004) 4.50

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS One (2013) 4.38

Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation. PLoS Med (2008) 3.57

Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists. BMJ (2011) 3.50

Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ (2010) 3.46

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 3.23

Investigation of within-study selective reporting in clinical research: follow-up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee. J Eval Clin Pract (2002) 3.23

Differences in reporting of analyses in internal company documents versus published trial reports: comparisons in industry-sponsored trials in off-label uses of gabapentin. PLoS Med (2013) 2.82

Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet. Lancet (2008) 2.76

Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols. BMJ (2008) 2.56

Timing and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journals. PLoS Med (2013) 1.78

Reporting on methods of subgroup analysis in clinical trials: a survey of four scientific journals. Braz J Med Biol Res (2001) 1.64

Subgroup analysis and covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neurosurgery (2005) 1.49

Subgroup analyses in therapeutic cardiovascular clinical trials: are most of them misleading? Am Heart J (2006) 1.48

Misuse of baseline comparison tests and subgroup analyses in surgical trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 1.23

Subgroups, treatment effects, and baseline risks: some lessons from major cardiovascular trials. Am Heart J (2000) 1.20

The influence of study characteristics on reporting of subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ (2011) 1.17

Learning from failure--rationale and design for a study about discontinuation of randomized trials (DISCO study). BMC Med Res Methodol (2012) 1.10

Reporting on covariate adjustment in randomised controlled trials before and after revision of the 2001 CONSORT statement: a literature review. Trials (2010) 1.05

Practices and impact of primary outcome adjustment in randomized controlled trials: meta-epidemiologic study. BMJ (2013) 1.03

Comparison of randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of reports in surgery journals. Ann Surg (2013) 0.96

Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 0.93

A comparison of subgroup analyses in grant applications and publications. Am J Epidemiol (2011) 0.85

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Med (2016) 1.47

Mortality in patients with HIV-1 infection starting antiretroviral therapy in South Africa, Europe, or North America: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. PLoS Med (2014) 1.40

Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS One (2014) 1.26

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey. PLoS One (2016) 1.12

Effects of BMI, fat mass, and lean mass on asthma in childhood: a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med (2014) 1.02

The Prevalence of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One (2015) 0.99

What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials. PLoS One (2015) 0.91

Patients' & healthcare professionals' values regarding true- & false-positive diagnosis when colorectal cancer screening by CT colonography: discrete choice experiment. PLoS One (2013) 0.89

Influence of childhood growth on asthma and lung function in adolescence. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2015) 0.85

Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies. PLoS One (2016) 0.77

Comparison of microbiological diagnosis of urinary tract infection in young children by routine health service laboratories and a research laboratory: Diagnostic cohort study. PLoS One (2017) 0.75

Maternal and childhood psychological factors predict chronic disabling fatigue at age 13 years. J Adolesc Health (2014) 0.75

Cause-Specific Mortality in HIV-Positive Patients Who Survived Ten Years after Starting Antiretroviral Therapy. PLoS One (2016) 0.75

Development of the Liverpool Adverse Drug Reaction Avoidability Assessment Tool. PLoS One (2017) 0.75

Assessment of the Incremental Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) for Interpretation of CT Colonography by Experienced and Inexperienced Readers. PLoS One (2015) 0.75

Core Outcomes Set for Trials in People With Coronavirus Disease 2019. Crit Care Med (2020) 0.75

International Survey to Establish Prioritized Outcomes for Trials in People With Coronavirus Disease 2019. Crit Care Med (2020) 0.75

Characteristics and Dissemination of Phase 1 Trials Approved by a UK Regional Office in 2012. JAMA (2017) 0.75