What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials.

PubWeight™: 0.91‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4459695)

Published in PLoS One on June 08, 2015

Authors

Louise Dudley1, Carrol Gamble1, Jennifer Preston2, Deborah Buck1, EPIC Patient Advisory Group, Bec Hanley3, Paula Williamson1, Bridget Young4

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
2: NIHR Clinical Research Network: Children, Coordinating Centre, University of Liverpool, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
3: TwoCan Associates, Brighton, United Kingdom.
4: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Articles cited by this

Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ (2001) 11.02

Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess (1998) 9.45

Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy. Clin Med (2006) 7.21

Healthcare in a land called PeoplePower: nothing about me without me. Health Expect (2001) 3.00

Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect (2012) 2.59

Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health (2001) 2.59

Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study. Health Expect (2011) 1.58

PCORI at 3 years--progress, lessons, and plans. N Engl J Med (2014) 1.58

Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the 'soft' option, or a form of sociological imperialism? Fam Pract (1998) 1.27

Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect (2013) 1.23

Consumer involvement in consent document development: a multicenter cluster randomized trial to assess study participants' understanding. Clin Trials (2006) 1.17

From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials. BMJ Open (2014) 1.11

Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation. BMJ Open (2014) 1.11

Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open (2014) 1.09

Consulting parents about the design of a randomized controlled trial of osteopathy for children with cerebral palsy. Health Expect (2011) 1.03

Mental health users' experiences of being interviewed by another user in a research project. A qualitative study. J Ment Health (2010) 1.00

Consumer and researcher collaboration in trials: filling the gaps. Clin Trials (2005) 0.91

A little more conversation please? Qualitative study of researchers' and patients' interview accounts of training for patient and public involvement in clinical trials. Trials (2015) 0.83