Published in Eur J Dent on January 01, 2014
Evaluation of cervical marginal and internal adaptation using newer bulk fill composites: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent (2015) 0.91
Fracture resistance of cementum-extended composite fillings in severely damaged deciduous incisors: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent (2014) 0.80
Reliability of marginal microleakage assessment by visual and digital methods. Eur J Dent (2015) 0.79
Effectiveness of flowable resin composite in reducing microleakage - an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health (2014) 0.79
The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand (2015) 0.75
Effect of preheating and light-curing unit on physicochemical properties of a bulk fill composite. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent (2017) 0.75
Resin composite--state of the art. Dent Mater (2010) 3.32
State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater (2010) 2.41
Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater (1999) 1.95
Silorane-based composite: depth of cure, surface hardness, degree of conversion, and cervical microleakage in Class II cavities. J Esthet Restor Dent (2011) 1.81
Microleakage: a review. J Dent (1976) 1.80
Photo-polymerization shrinkage-stress kinetics in resin-composites: methods development. Dent Mater (2003) 1.64
Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent (2009) 1.37
Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater (2010) 1.24
Smear layer: physiological considerations. Oper Dent Suppl (1984) 1.22
Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J (2011) 1.15
Effect of water storage on the bonding effectiveness of 6 adhesives to Class I cavity dentin. Oper Dent (2006) 1.13
Effects of residual ethanol on the rate and degree of conversion of five experimental resins. Dent Mater (2008) 1.11
Marginal integrity of class V restorations: SEM versus dye penetration. Dent Mater (2007) 1.09
The effect of thermocycling on microleakage of several commercially available composite Class V restorations in vitro. J Prosthet Dent (2003) 1.09
Durability of enamel bonding using two-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent (2008) 1.09
Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater (2012) 1.06
Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations. J Dent (2001) 1.03
Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1. Am J Dent (2002) 1.01
The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction. Oper Dent (2009) 0.99
Comparative evaluation of microleakage among three different glass ionomer types. Oper Dent (2011) 0.98
Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique. Oper Dent (2010) 0.96
Thermal expansion coefficient of dental composites measured with strain gauges. Dent Mater (1996) 0.96
In vitro corrosion measurements of dental alloys. J Dent (1994) 0.96
Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers--comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. J Adhes Dent (2008) 0.95
Effect of filler content of flowable composites on resin-cavity interface. Dent Mater J (2009) 0.94
Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. J Prosthet Dent (2004) 0.92
Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs. Indian J Dent Res (2009) 0.92
An in vitro evaluation of microleakage in class V preparations restored with Hybrid versus Silorane composites. J Conserv Dent (2011) 0.88
Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations. Am J Dent (2005) 0.87
The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration. Oper Dent (2010) 0.87
Effect of thermocycling on microleakage of resin composites polymerized with LED curing techniques. Quintessence Int (2007) 0.85
Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract (2008) 0.85
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment. J Appl Oral Sci (2010) 0.84
Effect of bonding application time on the microleakage of Class V sandwich restorations. Aust Dent J (2012) 0.81
Analysis of differential artificial ageing of the adhesive interface produced by a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci (2009) 0.80
Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction. Dent Mater (2009) 0.79
Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation between nanocomposites and microhybrid composites exposed to two light cure units. Indian J Dent Res (2011) 0.79
Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems. J Esthet Restor Dent (2002) 0.78
Polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin-based restorative materials. Oper Dent (2005) 0.78
Microleakage of Class II composite restorations. Am J Dent (2001) 0.77