Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation.

PubWeight™: 0.86^‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 25634033)

Published in Health Technol Assess on January 01, 2015

Authors

Aileen Clarke¹, Ruth Pulikottil-Jacob¹, Amy Grove¹, Karoline Freeman¹, Hema Mistry¹, Alexander Tsertsvadze¹, Martin Connock¹, Rachel Court¹, Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala¹, Matthew Costa¹, Gaurav Suri¹, David Metcalfe², Michael Crowther³, Sarah Morrow⁴, Samantha Johnson¹, Paul Sutcliffe¹

Author Affiliations

1: Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
2: Warwick Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
3: Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
4: Oxford Medical School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Articles citing this ↘

Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System(®). Med Devices (Auckl) (2015) 0.87

Long-term survivorship and complication rate comparison of a cementless modular stem and cementless fixed neck stems for primary total hip replacement. Int Orthop (2015) 0.87

Evaluating treatment effectiveness under model misspecification: A comparison of targeted maximum likelihood estimation with bias-corrected matching. Stat Methods Med Res (2014) 0.84

Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2016) 0.83

The choice between hip prosthetic bearing surfaces in total hip replacement: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev (2016) 0.78

Articles by these authors ⇆

Using electronic health records to predict costs and outcomes in stable coronary artery disease. Heart (2016) 0.83