Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System(®).

PubWeight™: 0.87‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 26648762)

Published in Med Devices (Auckl) on November 23, 2015

Authors

Daniel J Cher1, W Carlton Reckling2, Robyn A Capobianco1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Clinical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc. San Jose, CA, USA.
2: Department of Medical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA.

Associated clinical trials:

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With iFuse Implant System (SIFI) (SIFI) | NCT01640353

Investigation of Sacroiliac Fusion Treatment (INSITE) (INSITE) | NCT01681004

NCT 01640353

Articles cited by this

Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 3.78

Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2000) 3.37

Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J (2008) 2.55

Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2007) 2.47

Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2011) 2.33

Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint. Spine J (2005) 2.24

Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2011) 1.90

Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes. Neurosurgery (2015) 1.78

Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation. Spine J (2011) 1.66

Editorial: When "safe and effective" becomes dangerous. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 1.60

Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis-MIS Technique with Titanium Implants: Report of the First 50 Patients and Outcomes. Open Orthop J (2012) 1.50

Implications of the FDA statement on transvaginal placement of mesh: the aftermath. Curr Urol Rep (2014) 1.42

Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Innov Res (2013) 1.33

Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants. Open Orthop J (2014) 1.12

Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study. Med Devices (Auckl) (2013) 1.12

Endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Experience of first 100 cases. Indian J Orthop (2010) 1.10

Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). J Spinal Disord Tech (2014) 1.05

Percutaneous arthrodesis of sacro-iliac joint: a pilot study. J Neurosurg Sci (2013) 1.02

Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 0.99

Complications associated with the initial learning curve of minimally invasive spine surgery: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 0.98

One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis. Med Devices (Auckl) (2014) 0.95

A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique. Int J Spine Surg (2015) 0.91

National revision burden for lumbar total disc replacement in the United States: epidemiologic and economic perspectives. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2010) 0.88

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve. Spine J (2015) 0.87

Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Spine J (2014) 0.87

Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess (2015) 0.86

Pelvic mesh complications in women before and after the 2011 FDA public health notification. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg (2013) 0.85

FDA warns against procedure used in removing fibroids. JAMA (2014) 0.78