PubRank

Do surgery journals insist on reporting by CONSORT and PRISMA? A follow-up survey of 'instructions to authors'.

PubWeight™: 0.80‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4323756)

Published in Ann Med Surg (Lond) on January 05, 2015

Authors

Tanya A Smith1, Priyantha Kulatilake1, Lucy J Brown2, James Wigley3, Waseem Hameed4, Saran Shantikumar5

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Vascular Pathology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK.
2: Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
3: Department of Critical Care, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
4: Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
5: Department of Vascular Pathology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK ; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Articles citing this ↘

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Med (2016) 1.47

Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of "Instructions for Authors". Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med (2016) 0.75

Articles cited by this ↗

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med (2009) 65.36

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet (1999) 37.76

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA (1996) 36.04

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 22.34

The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA (2006) 19.24

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust (2006) 11.40

Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med (2004) 5.06

Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study. BMJ (2006) 4.36

Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'. Trials (2008) 4.17

The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev (2012) 2.86

CONSORT compliance in surgical randomized trials: are we there yet? A systematic review. Ann Surg (2013) 2.12

CONSORT and QUOROM statements revisited: standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery. Ann Surg (2008) 1.57

Impact factor: a call to reason. Epidemiology (2009) 1.54

Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med (2010) 1.44

Adherence of trials of operative intervention to the CONSORT statement extension for non-pharmacological treatments: a comparative before and after study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl (2012) 1.27

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2013) 1.07

Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors. Neth J Med (2014) 0.91

Compliance of randomized controlled trials in trauma surgery with the CONSORT statement. J Trauma Acute Care Surg (2013) 0.87

How psychiatry journals support the unbiased translation of clinical research. A cross-sectional study of editorial policies. PLoS One (2013) 0.85