Published in Crit Care on April 09, 2016
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (2011) 29.14
Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med (2005) 22.77
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol (2010) 16.24
A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med (2007) 10.13
Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2003) 8.26
A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics (1992) 3.83
Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 3.77
A study of proactive ethics consultation for critically and terminally ill patients with extended lengths of stay. Crit Care Med (1998) 3.57
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.44
An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med (2000) 3.32
Impact of a proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical ICU. Chest (2003) 3.25
Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med (2000) 3.20
Effect of a quality-improvement intervention on end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2010) 2.94
Proactive palliative care in the medical intensive care unit: effects on length of stay for selected high-risk patients. Crit Care Med (2007) 2.76
Seeking to reduce nonbeneficial treatment in the ICU: an exploratory trial of proactive ethics intervention*. Crit Care Med (2014) 2.18
Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for surrogates of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med (2012) 1.76
What really matters in end-of-life discussions? Perspectives of patients in hospital with serious illness and their families. CMAJ (2014) 1.54
Nonbeneficial treatment Canada: definitions, causes, and potential solutions from the perspective of healthcare practitioners*. Crit Care Med (2015) 1.45
Effectiveness trial of an intensive communication structure for families of long-stay ICU patients. Chest (2010) 1.38
Do objective estimates of chances for survival influence decisions to withhold or withdraw treatment? The French Multicentric Group of ICU Research. Med Decis Making (1990) 1.21
Improving family communications at the end of life: implications for length of stay in the intensive care unit and resource use. Am J Crit Care (2003) 1.14
Impact of an intensive communication strategy on end-of-life practices in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med (2011) 1.11
Augmenting communication and decision making in the intensive care unit with a cardiopulmonary resuscitation video decision support tool: a temporal intervention study. J Palliat Med (2012) 1.03
The effect of a family support intervention on family satisfaction, length-of-stay, and cost of care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med (2010) 0.98
Changing end-of-life care practice for liver transplant service patients: structured palliative care intervention in the surgical intensive care unit. J Pain Symptom Manage (2012) 0.93
An educational intervention in the surgical intensive care unit to improve ethical decisions. Surgery (1995) 0.88
The effect of completing a surrogacy information and decision-making tool upon admission to an intensive care unit on length of stay and charges. J Clin Ethics (2012) 0.81