Published in Elife on December 20, 2016
The credibility crisis in research: Can economics tools help? PLoS Biol (2017) 0.75
Can Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Generate Valid Clinical Neuroimaging Reports? Front Neurol (2017) 0.75
The DCDC2 deletion is not a risk factor for dyslexia. Transl Psychiatry (2017) 0.75
Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med (2005) 41.68
Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature (2001) 38.75
Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet (1991) 22.85
Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature (2012) 20.64
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med (2008) 19.86
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science (2015) 12.18
Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA (1992) 10.84
The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA (1990) 8.70
Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med (1987) 8.64
Publication and related biases. Health Technol Assess (2000) 6.47
Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors. BMJ (2005) 5.36
Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 4.14
Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence. BMJ (2015) 4.05
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2016) 3.72
Reanalyses of randomized clinical trial data. JAMA (2014) 3.62
Publication bias in editorial decision making. JAMA (2002) 3.52
Data dredging, bias, or confounding. BMJ (2002) 2.87
Social science. Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer. Science (2014) 2.51
An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research. Elife (2014) 2.43
HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known. Pers Soc Psychol Rev (1998) 2.42
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature (2016) 2.29
Role of Dicer in posttranscriptional RNA silencing. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol (2008) 2.19
Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture. Dis Model Mech (2014) 1.90
The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biol (2015) 1.71
Microparadigms: chains of collective reasoning in publications about molecular interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2006) 1.68
False-positive results in clinical trials: multiple significance tests and the problem of unreported comparisons. J Natl Cancer Inst (1996) 1.66
Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution. Proc Biol Sci (2002) 1.66
Manipulation of host behaviour by parasites: a weakening paradigm? Proc Biol Sci (2000) 1.55
Towards a reduction in publication bias. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) (1987) 1.30
Negative results: Null and void. Nature (2003) 1.02
Why selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective. PLoS One (2013) 0.97
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science (2016) 0.95
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results. PLoS One (2014) 0.87
Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery. PLoS One (2015) 0.87
Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions. PLoS Biol (2016) 0.83
Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials. PLoS Med (2016) 0.82
Go forth and replicate! Nature (2016) 0.79
Theory, models and biology. Elife (2015) 0.82
You lookin' at me? Br J Clin Pharmacol (2016) 0.75