Persuasive Interventions for Controversial Cancer Screening Recommendations: Testing a Novel Approach to Help Patients Make Evidence-Based Decisions.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 28376460)

Published in Ann Fam Med on January 06, 2017

Authors

Barry G Saver1,2,3, Kathleen M Mazor4,2, Roger Luckmann4, Sarah L Cutrona4,2,5, Marcela Hayes4, Tatyana Gorodetsky6, Nancy Esparza6, Gonzalo Bacigalupe7

Author Affiliations

1: University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts Barry.Saver@swedish.org.
2: Meyers Primary Care Research Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts.
3: Swedish Family Medicine Residency Cherry Hill, Seattle, Washington.
4: University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
5: Veterans Health Administration, HSRD COIN Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Hospitalo, Bedford, Massachusetts.
6: Center for Health Impact, Worcester, Massachusetts.
7: University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts.

Articles cited by this

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform (2008) 71.12

Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med (1997) 19.00

Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med (2012) 15.83

Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making (1995) 12.19

Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull (2001) 10.56

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2014) 8.74

Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA (2004) 8.22

Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Med Care Res Rev (2007) 3.24

Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med (2016) 3.02

Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med (2010) 2.82

Decision aids and uptake of screening. BMJ (2010) 2.67

Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication. J Natl Cancer Inst (2011) 2.61

Chemotherapy use among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life. Ann Intern Med (2003) 2.58

Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision-making research. Milbank Q (1997) 2.57

Population-based patterns and predictors of prostate-specific antigen screening among older men in the United States. J Clin Oncol (2011) 2.51

Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Med Decis Making (2005) 2.43

The effect on survival of continuing chemotherapy to near death. BMC Palliat Care (2011) 1.66

Shaping patients' decisions. Chest (2011) 1.58

"If I'm better than average, then I'm ok?": Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits. Patient Educ Couns (2007) 1.51

The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2010) 1.21

A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.21

Beneficent persuasion: techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients' decisions. Ann Fam Med (2010) 1.05

Adult Patients' Perspectives on the Benefits and Harms of Overused Screening Tests: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med (2015) 1.05

Improving inpatient antibiotic prescribing: insights from participation in a national collaborative. Jt Comm J Qual Improv (2001) 1.01

Validity of a low literacy version of the Decisional Conflict Scale. Patient Educ Couns (2011) 0.99

Moral principles and medical practice: the role of patient autonomy in the extensive use of radiological services. J Med Ethics (2008) 0.98

Media messages about cancer: what do people understand? J Health Commun (2010) 0.96

A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Alternate Formats for Presenting Benefits and Harms Information for Low-Value Screening Services: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med (2016) 0.95

Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies. Ann Intern Med (2016) 0.92

An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2009) 0.90

Mammography Decision Aid Reduces Decisional Conflict for Women in Their Forties Considering Screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2015) 0.87

Use of the prostate-specific antigen test among men aged 75 years or older in the United States: 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Prev Chronic Dis (2010) 0.82

Summaries for patients. Screening mammography in women age 40 to 49 years. Ann Intern Med (2007) 0.77