Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 29043592)

Published in Dig Dis Sci on October 17, 2017

Authors

Jennifer K Maratt1,2, Joseph Dickens3, Philip S Schoenfeld4, Grace H Elta5, Kenya Jackson5, Daniel Rizk3, Christine Erickson5, Stacy B Menees5,6

Author Affiliations

1: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 3912 Taubman Center, SPC 5362, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5362, USA. jkrai@med.umich.edu.
2: Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. jkrai@med.umich.edu.
3: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
4: John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
5: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 3912 Taubman Center, SPC 5362, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5362, USA.
6: Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Articles cited by this

Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med (2000) 13.21

Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med (2010) 11.76

Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med (2006) 10.52

Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med (2000) 6.90

Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2007) 4.62

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 4.17

Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history. Am J Gastroenterol (1993) 2.42

Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol (2014) 2.41

Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2010) 2.34

Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 1.94

Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2012) 1.65

The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2008) 1.61

Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2008) 1.54

Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc (2015) 1.39

Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2010) 1.32

Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2009) 1.24

Risk factors for sessile serrated adenomas. J Clin Gastroenterol (2011) 1.22

Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2013) 1.10

Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.08

Risk factors for serrated polyps of the colorectum. Dig Dis Sci (2014) 0.96

Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes 2000 to 2011. Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 0.96

Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology (2015) 0.95

Relationship between type-2 diabetes and use of metformin with risk of colorectal adenoma in an American population receiving colonoscopy. J Diabetes Complications (2013) 0.88

Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastrointest Endosc (2017) 0.78

Adenoma detection rate: in search of quality improvement, not just measurement. Gastrointest Endosc (2015) 0.77