Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy.

PubWeight™: 4.62‹?› | Rank: Top 1%

🔗 View Article (PMID 17222317)

Published in Am J Gastroenterol on January 11, 2007

Authors

Shawn C Chen1, Douglas K Rex

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

Associated clinical trials:

High Definition White-Light Colonoscopy vs. Chromoendoscopy for Surveillance of Lynch Syndrome. (EndoLynch) | NCT02951390

Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD2) | NCT01603927

Articles citing this

Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med (2014) 6.54

Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol (2012) 4.22

Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. Lancet Oncol (2014) 3.24

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position statement on screening individuals at average risk for developing colorectal cancer: 2010. Can J Gastroenterol (2010) 3.20

One-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia: U.S. versus U.K. risk-stratification guidelines. Ann Intern Med (2012) 2.70

Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol (2014) 2.41

Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy. Surg Endosc (2011) 2.15

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2014) 2.06

Accuracy of Medicare claims for identifying findings and procedures performed during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2010) 1.91

Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 1.83

Knowledge of quality performance measures associated with endoscopy among gastroenterology trainees and the impact of a web-based intervention. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 1.59

Canadian guidelines for colorectal cancer screening. Can J Gastroenterol (2011) 1.55

Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.52

Canadian credentialing guidelines for colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol (2008) 1.37

Colorectal cancer: from prevention to personalized medicine. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 1.26

Comparison of Colonoscopy Quality Measures Across Various Practice Settings and the Impact of Performance Scorecards. Dig Dis Sci (2016) 1.14

Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001. World J Gastroenterol (2009) 1.11

Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2013) 1.10

One colon lumen but two organs. Gastroenterology (2011) 1.09

Korean guidelines for postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance. Clin Endosc (2012) 1.05

Interval cancers after colonoscopy-insights and recommendations. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2012) 1.02

Retrospective analysis showing the water method increased adenoma detection rate - a hypothesis generating observation. J Interv Gastroenterol (2011) 1.02

Colonoscopy quality: metrics and implementation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am (2013) 0.97

Detection of colonic polyps according to insertion/withdrawal phases of colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis (2009) 0.95

The quality of screening colonoscopies in an office-based endoscopy clinic. Can J Gastroenterol (2009) 0.94

Variation in diagnostic performance among radiologists at screening CT colonography. Radiology (2013) 0.91

Quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by primary care physicians with standby specialist support. Med Care (2010) 0.89

High-definition colonoscopy with i-Scan: better diagnosis for small polyps and flat adenomas. World J Gastroenterol (2012) 0.89

"Demand the data! Your patients will ask and your practice will need it". Am J Gastroenterol (2007) 0.87

A prospective randomized study on computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of small colorectal adenomas. Dig Dis Sci (2009) 0.86

Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer. Clin Exp Gastroenterol (2011) 0.86

Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening. Cancer Med (2013) 0.86

Adjusting for patient demographics has minimal effects on rates of adenoma detection in a large, community-based setting. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2014) 0.86

Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy(.) Tech Gastrointest Endosc (2013) 0.85

Performance measures of surgeon-performed colonoscopy in a Veterans Affairs medical center. Surg Endosc (2009) 0.85

The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates. Gastroenterol Res Pract (2016) 0.84

Current status of chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging in colonoscopy. Clin Colon Rectal Surg (2010) 0.84

Biomarkers, bundled payments, and colorectal cancer care. Genes Cancer (2012) 0.84

Endoscopist specialty is associated with high-quality endoscopy in Korea. Yonsei Med J (2012) 0.83

Comparative effectiveness of i-SCAN™ and high-definition white light characterizing small colonic polyps. World J Gastroenterol (2012) 0.83

Second-Look Colonoscopies and the Impact on Capacity in FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Gastroenterol (2015) 0.83

Patient interest in video recording of colonoscopy: a survey. World J Gastroenterol (2010) 0.82

Prevalence of colorectal neoplasms in Asian Americans. Dig Dis Sci (2008) 0.82

Role of high definition colonoscopy in colorectal adenomatous polyp detection. World J Gastroenterol (2011) 0.81

An endoscopic training model to improve accuracy of colonic polyp size measurement. Int J Colorectal Dis (2010) 0.81

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures. United European Gastroenterol J (2015) 0.81

Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities. World J Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 0.81

Different screening definitions have little impact on polypectomy rate estimates. Can J Gastroenterol (2012) 0.81

Quality colonoscopy: a matter of time, technique or technology? World J Gastroenterol (2013) 0.80

Strategies for colon cancer prevention. EPMA J (2010) 0.80

Risk of colorectal adenomas in patients with coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2010) 0.80

Colonoscopic polyp detection rate is stable throughout the workday including evening colonoscopy sessions. F1000Res (2014) 0.79

Improving quality measures in colonoscopy and its therapeutic intervention. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 0.79

Colonoscopy withdrawal times and adenoma detection rates. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) (2007) 0.79

CT colonography and cost-effectiveness. Eur Radiol (2008) 0.78

Achieving competence in colonoscopy: Milestones and the need for a new endoscopic curriculum in gastroenterology training. World J Gastrointest Endosc (2015) 0.78

Isn't it time to stop talking about colonoscopy quality and start doing something about it? Dig Dis Sci (2011) 0.78

Addressing the challenge of assessing physician-level screening performance: mammography as an example. PLoS One (2014) 0.78

Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance. Dig Dis Sci (2015) 0.77

Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc (2014) 0.77

Quality monitoring in colonoscopy: Time to act. World J Gastrointest Endosc (2015) 0.77

Prospective Study of the Quality of Colonoscopies Performed by Primary Care Physicians: The Alberta Primary Care Endoscopy (APC-Endo) Study. PLoS One (2013) 0.77

Disparities in evaluation of patients with rectal bleeding 40 years and older. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2013) 0.77

Endoscopist specialty is associated with colonoscopy quality. BMC Gastroenterol (2013) 0.77

Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats. World J Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 0.76

Colonoscopy: the current king of the hill in the USA. Dig Dis Sci (2014) 0.75

Accuracy of endoscopists' estimate of polyp size: A continuous dilemma. World J Gastrointest Endosc (2015) 0.75

The day of the week does not affect the adenoma detection rate. Dig Dis Sci (2013) 0.75

FITting ADR to colonoscopy indication. United European Gastroenterol J (2016) 0.75

Trainee colonoscopists fulfil quality standards for the detection of adenomatous polyps. BMC Med Educ (2015) 0.75

Effective colonoscopy training techniques: strategies to improve patient outcomes. Adv Med Educ Pract (2016) 0.75

Does deep sedation with propofol affect adenoma detection rates in average risk screening colonoscopy exams? World J Gastrointest Endosc (2017) 0.75

Introduction: what are new roles of current colonoscopy? Clin Endosc (2013) 0.75

Antispasmodic drugs in colonoscopy: a review of their pharmacology, safety and efficacy in improving polyp detection and related outcomes. Therap Adv Gastroenterol (2016) 0.75

[Colonoscopy: the endoscopist as a risk factor]. Z Gastroenterol (2008) 0.75

Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size? World J Gastroenterol (2016) 0.75

Cirrhotic Patients Have Worse Bowel Preparation at Screening Colonoscopy than Chronic Liver Disease Patients without Cirrhosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol (2016) 0.75

Optimizing adenoma detection rates: equipment, experience or education? Ann Gastroenterol (2013) 0.75

A Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2016) 0.75

Polyp detection rates using magnification with narrow band imaging and white light. World J Gastrointest Endosc (2015) 0.75

Polypectomy skills of gastroenterology fellows: can we improve them? Endosc Int Open (2016) 0.75

Interendoscopist variability in proximal colon polyp detection is twice higher for serrated polyps than adenomas. World J Gastroenterol (2016) 0.75

Implementing quality improvement programs for colonoscopy: the emerging need for an international, standardized, multidisciplinary approach. Endosc Int Open (2016) 0.75

Polyp detection rate in transverse and sigmoid colon significantly increases with longer withdrawal time during screening colonoscopy. PLoS One (2017) 0.75

Colorectal cancer screening: Opportunities to improve uptake, outcomes, and disparities. World J Gastrointest Endosc (2016) 0.75

The Colonoscopist's Expertise Affects the Characteristics of Detected Polyps. Clin Endosc (2016) 0.75

Patient age and duration of colonoscopy are predictors for adenoma detection in both proximal and distal colon. World J Gastroenterol (2015) 0.75

Interval colorectal carcinoma: An unsolved debate. World J Gastroenterol (2015) 0.75

Sedation and polyp detection. Dig Dis Sci (2010) 0.75

Does a Pre-Training Program Influence Colonoscopy Proficiency during Fellowship? PLoS One (2016) 0.75

Effect of Colonoscopy Volume on Quality Indicators. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2016) 0.75

Performance report cards increase adenoma detection rate. Endosc Int Open (2017) 0.75

Association of trainee participation with adenoma and polyp detection rates. World J Gastrointest Endosc (2017) 0.75

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol (2017) 0.75

Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates. Dig Dis Sci (2017) 0.75

Annual colonoscopy volume and maintenance of competency for surgeons. Surg Endosc (2016) 0.75

Editorial: The Name Game: Circumventing Quality Metrics by Categorizing Incomplete Colonoscopy as Sigmoidoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2017) 0.75

Articles by these authors

(truncated to the top 100)

Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology (2008) 15.86

Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin (2008) 12.90

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology (2012) 8.51

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 6.51

A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 5.38

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology (2006) 4.57

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 4.17

Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 4.07

Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2009) 3.96

Prophylactic clip closure reduced the risk of delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: experience in 277 clipped large sessile or flat colorectal lesions and 247 control lesions. Gastrointest Endosc (2013) 3.72

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin (2006) 3.21

Incidence and predictors of "late" recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 2.99

Maximizing control of tip deflection with sound ergonomics: the "left hand shaft grip". Gastrointest Endosc (2007) 2.82

Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med (2008) 2.74

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 2.51

High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol (2010) 2.47

Efficacy of bispectral monitoring as an adjunct to nurse-administered propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 2.39

Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 2.35

Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2010) 2.34

Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 2.27

High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 2.22

Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc (2013) 2.16

ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc (2015) 2.11

Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology (2012) 2.11

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2014) 2.06

Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 1.90

Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc (2010) 1.87

Differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic colorectal polyps: narrow-band imaging can be learned in 20 minutes. Gastrointest Endosc (2010) 1.80

Position statement: Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Gastroenterology (2009) 1.67

A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2010) 1.63

Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 1.62

Prospective description of coughing, hemodynamic changes, and oxygen desaturation during endoscopic sedation. Dig Dis Sci (2012) 1.61

Nanocytology of rectal colonocytes to assess risk of colon cancer based on field cancerization. Cancer Res (2012) 1.53

Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and colorectal cancer resection. Am Fam Physician (2008) 1.52

Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer by aspirin: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gastroenterology (2002) 1.49

Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.42

Position statement: Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Hepatology (2009) 1.41

Considering double contrast barium enema and its demise: a case for systematic videorecording of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2008) 1.40

A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc (2004) 1.37

Patients' description of rectal effluent and quality of bowel preparation at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2010) 1.36

High detection rates of colorectal neoplasia by stool DNA testing with a novel digital melt curve assay. Gastroenterology (2008) 1.34

Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 1.30

Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol (2004) 1.29

Real-time optical biopsy of colon polyps with narrow band imaging in community practice does not yet meet key thresholds for clinical decisions. Gastroenterology (2012) 1.28

An initial investigation of efficiency in endoscopy delivery. Am J Gastroenterol (2002) 1.28

Willingness to undergo split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and compliance with split-dose instructions. Dig Dis Sci (2010) 1.26

Colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am (2008) 1.26

Wireless capsule endoscopy detects small bowel ulcers in patients with normal results from state of the art enteroclysis. Am J Gastroenterol (2003) 1.26

A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study. Am J Gastroenterol (2013) 1.24

Efficacy and complications of argon plasma coagulation for hematochezia related to radiation proctopathy. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 1.23

Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2003) 1.22

Minimizing endoscopic complications: colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am (2007) 1.21

Safety analysis of endoscopist-directed propofol sedation: a prospective, national multicenter study of 24 441 patients in German outpatient practices. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2014) 1.20

Screening, surveillance, and primary prevention for colorectal cancer: a review of the recent literature. Gastroenterology (2008) 1.19

Position statement: nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 1.17

Nurse-administered propofol sedation without anesthesia specialists in 9152 endoscopic cases in an ambulatory surgery center. Am J Gastroenterol (2003) 1.17

Excellence in endoscopy: toward practical metrics. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.15

Colonoscopic identification of a foreign body causing an hepatic abscess. J Clin Gastroenterol (2003) 1.15

Colonoscopy and diminutive polyps: hot or cold biopsy or snare? Do I send to pathology? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2010) 1.13

Colonoscopy-induced splenic injury: report of 3 cases and literature review. Dig Dis Sci (2007) 1.13

Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001. World J Gastroenterol (2009) 1.11

Position statement: Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2009) 1.08

Improving colonoscopy quality through health-care payment reform. Am J Gastroenterol (2010) 1.08

Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 1.06

Leaving distal colorectal hyperplastic polyps in place can be achieved with high accuracy by using narrow-band imaging: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 1.05

Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.03

A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of fospropofol disodium for sedation during colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol (2010) 1.02

Multisociety sedation curriculum for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastroenterology (2012) 1.02

Preprocedure patient values regarding sedation for colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol (2005) 1.02

Multisociety sedation curriculum for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 1.01

Split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and residual gastric fluid volume: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc (2010) 1.01

Looking over your shoulder during colonoscopy: potential roles for videorecording colonoscopy withdrawals. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 1.01

Technical performance of colonoscopy in patients sedated with nurse-administered propofol. Am J Gastroenterol (2004) 0.99

An initial investigation of bispectral monitoring as an adjunct to nurse-administered propofol sedation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2004) 0.97

A low-residue diet improved patient satisfaction with split-dose oral sulfate solution without impairing colonic preparation. Gastrointest Endosc (2013) 0.97

Bringing new endoscopic imaging technology into everyday practice: what is the role of professional GI societies? Polyp imaging as a template for moving endoscopic innovation forward to answer key clinical questions. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 0.95

Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what? Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 0.95

Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients. Am J Gastroenterol (2003) 0.94

Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 0.94

Bowel obstruction and pseudo-obstruction. Gastroenterol Clin North Am (2003) 0.94

Have we defined best colonoscopic polypectomy practice in the United States? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2007) 0.94

Improving protection against proximal colon cancer by colonoscopy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2011) 0.93

Advances in colonoscope technique and technology. Rev Gastroenterol Disord (2008) 0.93

CT and radiation-related cancer risk-time for a paradigm shift? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2009) 0.93

Tips for better colonoscopy from two experts. Am J Gastroenterol (2012) 0.93

Colonoscopy: the dominant and preferred colorectal cancer screening strategy in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc (2007) 0.92

Endoscopic treatment of chronic radiation proctopathy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol (2006) 0.92

Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection. J Clin Gastroenterol (2008) 0.92

Endoscopic findings of diverticular inflammation in colonoscopy patients without clinical acute diverticulitis: prevalence and endoscopic spectrum. Am J Gastroenterol (2003) 0.92

Who is the best colonoscopist? Gastrointest Endosc (2007) 0.91

Primary prevention of colorectal cancer with low-dose aspirin in combination with endoscopy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gut (2011) 0.91

Does colonoscopy work? J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2010) 0.91

Efficacy and effectiveness of colonoscopy: how do we bridge the gap? Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am (2010) 0.91

Water immersion simplifies cecal intubation in patients with redundant colons and previous incomplete colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 0.90

A novel shape-locking guide for prevention of sigmoid looping during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2004) 0.90

Relationship of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms to quality of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am (2010) 0.90

Update on colonoscopic imaging and projections for the future. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2009) 0.90

Editorial: Detection targets for colonoscopy: from variable detection to validation. Am J Gastroenterol (2010) 0.90

Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer: state of the art. Gastrointest Endosc (2013) 0.90

Performance of Given suspected blood indicator. Am J Gastroenterol (2003) 0.89