Published in Fertil Steril on August 01, 1998
Vasectomy and risk of aggressive prostate cancer: a 24-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol (2014) 4.67
Requests for vasectomy: counselling and consent. J R Soc Med (2001) 2.03
Good practice in sterilisation. BMJ (2000) 1.49
Advances in male contraception. Endocr Rev (2008) 1.39
Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event. BMC Med Res Methodol (2012) 1.01
Sterilization in the United States. Rev Obstet Gynecol (2008) 0.98
Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer. J Urol (2008) 0.93
Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Sci Rep (2015) 0.82
Vasectomy and prostate cancer: the evidence to date. Fertil Steril (1998) 0.76
Vasectomy: potential links to an increased risk of aggressive prostate cancer? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther (2015) 0.75
Alcohol and intimate partner violence: do we have enough information to act? Eur J Public Health (2006) 1.24
Evaluation of two retrospective active surveillance methods for the detection of nosocomial infection in surgical patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol (2000) 0.85
[Gender bias in women with myocardial infarction: ten years after]. Med Intensiva (2008) 0.79
Evidence based educational outreach visits: effects on prescriptions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Epidemiol Community Health (2002) 0.78
[Hemofiltration in sepsis: what is the evidence?]. Med Intensiva (2010) 0.75
[Use of internet and electronic resources among Spanish intensivist physicians. First national survey]. Med Intensiva (2006) 0.75
[Clinical significance of acute coronary syndrome with transient ST-segment elevation]. Med Intensiva (2011) 0.75
[Impact of two new studies on the results of a meta-analysis on the application of high PEEP in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome]. Med Intensiva (2008) 0.75
[Safety and economic efficiency of platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation]. Rev Esp Cardiol (2000) 0.75
[High PEEP vs. conventional PEEP in the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis]. Med Intensiva (2007) 0.75
[Quality indicators in the acute coronary syndrome for the analysis of the pre- and in-hospital care process]. Med Intensiva (2010) 0.75