Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

PubWeight™: 2.10‹?› | Rank: Top 2%

🔗 View Article (PMID 12636052)

Published in Clin Chem Lab Med on January 01, 2003

Authors

Patrick M Bossuyt1, Johannes B Reitsma, David E Bruns, Constantine A Gatsonis, Paul P Glasziou, Les M Irwig, Jeroen G Lijmer, David Moher, Drummond Rennie, Henrica C W de Vet, STARD group

Author Affiliations

1: Academic Medical Center, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. stard@amc.uva.nl

Articles citing this

Redefining MTBDRplus test results: what do indeterminate results actually mean? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis (2016) 1.45

Reliability of quantitative real-time PCR for bacterial detection in cystic fibrosis airway specimens. PLoS One (2010) 1.37

A perspective on challenges and issues in biomarker development and drug and biomarker codevelopment. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 1.31

Loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) accurately detects malaria DNA from filter paper blood samples of low density parasitaemias. PLoS One (2014) 1.28

Standards of excellence and open questions in cancer biomarker research: an informatics perspective. Cancer Inform (2005) 1.15

Expert systems in clinical microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev (2011) 1.07

Commentary on: Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. J Behav Addict (2015) 1.03

Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review. Syst Rev (2015) 0.95

Clinical impact of an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for detection of hypervascular liver tumours using a low tube voltage, high tube current MDCT technique. Eur Radiol (2013) 0.91

Comparison of Schistosoma mansoni soluble cercarial antigens and soluble egg antigens for serodiagnosing schistosome infections. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2012) 0.91

Utility of testing for monoclonal bands in serum of patients with suspected osteoporosis: retrospective, cross sectional study. BMJ (2005) 0.87

Occult incontinence as predictor for postoperative stress urinary incontinence following pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J (2012) 0.83

A pilot study of short-duration sputum pretreatment procedures for optimizing smear microscopy for tuberculosis. PLoS One (2009) 0.83

UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry Method for Measurement of the Coagulation Inhibitors Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban in Human Plasma and Its Comparison with Functional Assays. PLoS One (2015) 0.83

A Highly Efficient Gene Expression Programming (GEP) Model for Auxiliary Diagnosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer. PLoS One (2015) 0.79

The use of standardised short-term and working memory tests in aphasia research: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil (2016) 0.77

Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration. Int J Equity Health (2015) 0.76

Predictive performance of four frailty measures in an older Australian population. Age Ageing (2015) 0.75

Prosthetic joint infection development of an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm. Eur J Med Res (2017) 0.75

Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative. Clin Chem Lab Med (2003) 0.75

The mind and liver test: a new approach to the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in resource-poor settings. Int J Hepatol (2014) 0.75

STARD guidelines: another piece of an intricate puzzle for evaluating the quality of scientific publishing. Ann Transl Med (2016) 0.75

Improving accuracy of diagnostic studies in a world with limited resources: a road ahead. Ann Transl Med (2016) 0.75

Is it feasible to detect epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in circulating tumor cells in nonsmall cell lung cancer?: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) (2016) 0.75

Early morning urine collection to improve urinary lateral flow LAM assay sensitivity in hospitalised patients with HIV-TB co-infection. BMC Infect Dis (2017) 0.75

Articles by these authors

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (2011) 29.14

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 22.34

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (2009) 22.18

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2009) 21.74

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol (2006) 20.17

The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol (2003) 16.17

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med (2010) 16.11

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med (2011) 15.02

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2008) 13.87

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol (2007) 13.46

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg (2010) 12.98

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2009) 12.16

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 11.80

Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med (2004) 11.47

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust (2006) 11.40

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ (2003) 10.80

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2003) 10.28

Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ (2008) 9.98

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med (2010) 9.30

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ (2013) 9.01

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med (2003) 8.58

SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med (2013) 8.21

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem (2003) 8.13

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem (2003) 7.92

Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA (2009) 7.89

Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med (2004) 7.87

The STARD initiative and the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chem (2003) 7.81

Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ (2014) 7.55

The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol (2003) 7.54

Splinting vs surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2002) 7.31

Registering clinical trials. JAMA (2003) 7.21

Antibiotic prophylaxis and recurrent urinary tract infection in children. N Engl J Med (2009) 6.88

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med (2010) 6.88

Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med (2004) 6.87

Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2011) 6.80

The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 6.61

Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med (2006) 6.34

Hypothermia therapy after traumatic brain injury in children. N Engl J Med (2008) 6.10

The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res (2010) 6.09

Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 6.03

Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem (2002) 6.03

The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 5.93

How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med (2007) 5.86

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2008) 5.85

Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (2012) 5.65

Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology (2008) 5.59

Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA (2013) 4.98

Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med (2006) 4.76

The use of aspirin for primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a systematic review prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2007) 4.74

Corticosteroids as standalone or add-on treatment for sore throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 4.50

The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med (2015) 4.49

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med (2009) 4.43

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev (2012) 4.36

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med (2015) 4.32

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials (2010) 4.28

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health (2013) 4.22

CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet (2008) 4.20

Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol (2002) 4.19