Published in BMJ on November 11, 2008
Mindfulness Intervention for Overweight Primary Care Patients (MindEat) | NCT02893150
Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation for Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fracture (SENSE) | NCT04075461
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 28.70
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 22.34
CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res (2011) 9.62
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med (2010) 9.30
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med (2010) 6.88
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials (2010) 4.28
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. CMAJ (2009) 3.65
Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. PLoS Med (2010) 3.63
Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med (2010) 3.45
Isoniazid plus antiretroviral therapy to prevent tuberculosis: a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet (2014) 3.21
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet (2009) 2.86
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials (2009) 2.77
Effect of peer health workers on AIDS care in Rakai, Uganda: a cluster-randomized trial. PLoS One (2010) 2.53
An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice. Am J Prev Med (2012) 2.23
Linear growth increased in young children in an urban slum of Haiti: a randomized controlled trial of a lipid-based nutrient supplement. Am J Clin Nutr (2013) 2.21
A Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation. Am J Public Health (2015) 2.19
A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci (2011) 2.19
Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. Acupunct Med (2010) 2.14
CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother (2010) 2.13
Impact of a mHealth intervention for peer health workers on AIDS care in rural Uganda: a mixed methods evaluation of a cluster-randomized trial. AIDS Behav (2011) 2.08
Impact of replacing smear microscopy with Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosing tuberculosis in Brazil: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial. PLoS Med (2014) 2.05
The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials. Trials (2009) 2.03
Obesity treatment for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in primary care practice. Arch Intern Med (2012) 1.98
Implementation science and its application to population health. Annu Rev Public Health (2013) 1.92
Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review. BMJ (2014) 1.81
Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth (2011) 1.80
Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Med (2013) 1.76
Estimating the population impact of preventive interventions from randomized trials. Am J Prev Med (2011) 1.72
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ (2016) 1.60
A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials. Clin Transl Gastroenterol (2014) 1.60
Impact of community management of fever (using antimalarials with or without antibiotics) on childhood mortality: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Ghana. Am J Trop Med Hyg (2012) 1.58
Effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med (2015) 1.56
Analgesia after total knee replacement: local infiltration versus epidural combined with a femoral nerve blockade: a prospective, randomised pragmatic trial. Bone Joint J (2013) 1.55
REDEEM: a pragmatic trial to reduce diabetes distress. Diabetes Care (2013) 1.50
Applying the PRECIS criteria to describe three effectiveness trials of weight loss in obese patients with comorbid conditions. Health Serv Res (2011) 1.47
Impact of Nurse-Led, Multidisciplinary Home-Based Intervention on Event-Free Survival Across the Spectrum of Chronic Heart Disease: Composite Analysis of Health Outcomes in 1226 Patients From 3 Randomized Trials. Circulation (2016) 1.41
Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMJ (2014) 1.41
With great data comes great responsibility: publishing comparative effectiveness research in epidemiology. Epidemiology (2011) 1.29
The Oxford Implementation Index: a new tool for incorporating implementation data into systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 1.29
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Open Med (2010) 1.29
Reassessing the evidence hierarchy in asthma: evaluating comparative effectiveness. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep (2011) 1.28
A cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of a physician-pharmacist collaborative model to improve blood pressure control. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2010) 1.26
Peer health workers and AIDS care in Rakai, Uganda: a mixed methods operations research evaluation of a cluster-randomized trial. AIDS Patient Care STDS (2011) 1.23
Making clinical trials more relevant: improving and validating the PRECIS tool for matching trial design decisions to trial purpose. Trials (2013) 1.22
The Fremantle Primary Prevention Study: a multicentre randomised trial of absolute cardiovascular risk reduction. Br J Gen Pract (2012) 1.19
What have we learned about trial design from NIMH-funded pragmatic trials? Neuropsychopharmacology (2010) 1.17
What kind of randomized trials do we need? CMAJ (2009) 1.16
Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Public Health (2011) 1.15
Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review. Syst Rev (2012) 1.15
Reductions in regimen distress are associated with improved management and glycemic control over time. Diabetes Care (2013) 1.14
Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): A cluster randomised trial protocol. Implement Sci (2010) 1.13
Protocol for CONSORT-SPI: an extension for social and psychological interventions. Implement Sci (2013) 1.13
External validity reporting in behavioral treatment of childhood obesity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med (2012) 1.13
Growing Right Onto Wellness (GROW): a family-centered, community-based obesity prevention randomized controlled trial for preschool child-parent pairs. Contemp Clin Trials (2013) 1.11
The value of the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary wheel in an ongoing study: the bullous pemphigoid steroids and tetracyclines study. Trials (2012) 1.10
Preventing acute malnutrition among young children in crises: a prospective intervention study in Niger. PLoS Med (2014) 1.08
Design of a randomized controlled study of a multi-professional and multidimensional intervention targeting frail elderly people. BMC Geriatr (2011) 1.08
Feasibility of a randomised trial of a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making on the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care: the DECISION+ pilot trial. Implement Sci (2011) 1.07
Weekly self-monitoring and treatment adjustment benefit patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma: an analysis of the SMASHING study. Respir Res (2010) 1.06
Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials (2013) 1.06
Reporting quality of social and psychological intervention trials: a systematic review of reporting guidelines and trial publications. PLoS One (2013) 1.05
A systematic review of eHealth cancer prevention and control interventions: new technology, same methods and designs? Transl Behav Med (2013) 1.05
How usual is usual care in pragmatic intervention studies in primary care? An overview of recent trials. Br J Gen Pract (2010) 1.04
Exposing the evidence gap for complementary and alternative medicine to be integrated into science-based medicine. J R Soc Med (2011) 1.03
Panel Management to Improve Smoking and Hypertension Outcomes by VA Primary Care Teams: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med (2015) 1.03
"Not just another walking program": Everyday Activity Supports You (EASY) model-a randomized pilot study for a parallel randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud (2015) 1.02
Feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to reduce overweight and obesity in children: The electronic games to aid motivation to exercise (eGAME) study. BMC Public Health (2009) 1.00
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud (2016) 0.99
Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2). Trials (2015) 0.99
Moving from efficacy to effectiveness trials in prevention research. Behav Res Ther (2010) 0.99
An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol (2015) 0.99
The reporting quality, scientific rigor, and ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine compound formulations and the differences between Chinese and non-Chinese trials. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp (2010) 0.98
Economic analyses of the Be Fit Be Well program: a weight loss program for community health centers. J Gen Intern Med (2013) 0.98
Ghana's Ensure Mothers and Babies Regular Access to Care (EMBRACE) program: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials (2015) 0.97
How well do randomized trials inform decision making: systematic review using comparative effectiveness research measures on acupuncture for back pain. PLoS One (2012) 0.97
A call for action: Comparative effectiveness research in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2010) 0.97
Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials. Trials (2013) 0.96
The effectiveness of the Austrian disease management programme for type 2 diabetes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract (2010) 0.96
Effectiveness Guidance Document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials. BMC Complement Altern Med (2012) 0.96
Long-term outcomes of internet-based self-management support in adults with asthma: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res (2013) 0.93
Effect of ischemic postconditioning on infarct size in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI results of the POSTEMI (POstconditioning in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) randomized trial. J Am Heart Assoc (2014) 0.93
HIV self-testing among key populations: an implementation science approach to evaluating self-testing. J Virus Erad (2015) 0.93
Enhancing ventilation in homes of children with asthma: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract (2011) 0.93
Return to normal life after AIDS as a reason for lost to follow-up in a community-based antiretroviral treatment program. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (2012) 0.93
A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med (2015) 0.93
More rigorous protocol adherence to intensive structured management improves blood pressure control in primary care: results from the Valsartan Intensified Primary carE Reduction of Blood Pressure study. J Hypertens (2014) 0.92
Controlled trial of a collaborative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depression: rationale and design for a comprehensive evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res (2012) 0.92
Treatment duration of febrile urinary tract infection (FUTIRST trial): a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial comparing short (7 days) antibiotic treatment with conventional treatment (14 days). BMC Infect Dis (2009) 0.92
Getting better at chronic care in remote communities: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled of community based management. BMC Public Health (2012) 0.91
A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial of early intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by practice nurse-general practitioner teams: Study Protocol. Implement Sci (2012) 0.91
Disaggregated data and beyond: future queries in cancer control research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2014) 0.91
Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions. Implement Sci (2015) 0.90
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2001) 37.70
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet (2001) 31.74
Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med (1991) 18.33
CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ (2004) 16.50
Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA (2003) 14.72
Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2008) 13.87
Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chronic Dis (1967) 13.52
Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA (2006) 11.87
Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med (2004) 11.47
Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study. N Engl J Med (2004) 11.44
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust (2006) 11.40
External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet (2005) 11.35
Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ (2004) 9.57
Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof (2006) 8.25
What are pragmatic trials? BMJ (1998) 7.93
Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol (2006) 7.09
How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed? BMJ (2000) 6.66
Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet (2005) 6.55
Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med (2006) 6.34
Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA (2007) 6.09
Statistics notes. Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise? BMJ (1999) 5.86
Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity. BMC Med Res Methodol (2003) 4.31
Representation of elderly persons and women in published randomized trials of acute coronary syndromes. JAMA (2001) 4.28
CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet (2008) 4.20
Effect of a clinical pathway to reduce hospitalizations in nursing home residents with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2006) 3.83
Parenting intervention in Sure Start services for children at risk of developing conduct disorder: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ (2007) 3.79
Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Ann Intern Med (2008) 3.63
Pragmatic clinical trials. Complement Ther Med (2004) 3.47
Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations. Med Care (2005) 3.38
Effectiveness of telephone counselling by a pharmacist in reducing mortality in patients receiving polypharmacy: randomised controlled trial. BMJ (2006) 3.02
Randomised controlled trial of a short course of traditional acupuncture compared with usual care for persistent non-specific low back pain. BMJ (2006) 2.63
Transitional care facility for elderly people in hospital awaiting a long term care bed: randomised controlled trial. BMJ (2005) 2.61
Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract (2004) 2.36
Underrepresentation of renal disease in randomized controlled trials of cardiovascular disease. JAMA (2006) 2.22
Benefits of supervised group exercise programme for women being treated for early stage breast cancer: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ (2007) 1.99
Effects of community based nurses specialising in Parkinson's disease on health outcome and costs: randomised controlled trial. BMJ (2002) 1.93
Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry (1999) 1.90
Large pragmatic randomised studies of new antiepileptic drugs are needed. BMJ (1997) 1.83
An educational intervention to improve physician reporting of adverse drug reactions: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2006) 1.65
News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med (2000) 1.59
Blind faith? The effects of promoting active sick leave for back pain patients: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2002) 1.55
[Roaming through methodology. XII. Pragmatic and pathophysiologic trials: a question of goal formulation]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd (1999) 1.49
Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open (2012) 1.39
Homeopathic care for the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections in children: a pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial comparing individualised homeopathic care and waiting-list controls. Complement Ther Med (2005) 1.15
Understanding randomized controlled trials: explanatory or pragmatic? Fam Pract (1994) 1.12
Challenges to evidence-based medicine: a comparison of patients and treatments in randomized controlled trials with patients and treatments in a practice research network. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol (2005) 1.03
Buprenorphine versus dihydrocodeine for opiate detoxification in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract (2007) 1.01
Pragmatic and mechanistic trials. Eur Heart J (1997) 1.00
[A critical review of the pragmatic clinical trial]. Med Clin (Barc) (2003) 0.98
Understanding controlled trials: what outcomes should be measured? BMJ (1998) 0.96
Seven criteria for improving effectiveness trials in psychiatry. Psychol Med (2006) 0.94
Explanatory and pragmatic perspectives regarding idiopathic physical symptoms and related syndromes. CNS Spectr (2006) 0.91
Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in parenting research: the issue of intention to treat. J Epidemiol Community Health (2006) 0.91
Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trials for Complex Therapies. Forsch Komplementarmed (1998) 0.90
Guest editors' introduction: what can large pragmatic clinical trials do for public mental health care? Schizophr Bull (2003) 0.90
The relationship between clinical trials and clinical practice: the risks of underestimating its complexity. Stat Med (1994) 0.90
[Principles of medical statistics. XII. Causal of pragmatic clinical research?]. Nord Med (1971) 0.90
[From the explanatory to the pragmatic]. Bull Cancer (1987) 0.89
[Explanatory or pragmatic trials, the dualism]. Rev Med Interne (1994) 0.89
Sample size, representativeness, and credibility in pragmatic neonatal trials. Am J Perinatol (1987) 0.88
[Pragmatic clinical trials: an option in the construction of health-related evidence]. Cad Saude Publica (2003) 0.88
Limitations of "pragmatic" trials. Postgrad Med J (2005) 0.88
Fungal infections of skin and nails of feet. Pragmatic clinical trial is now needed. BMJ (1999) 0.86
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (2003) 128.20
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med (2009) 65.36
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med (2009) 35.37
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (2009) 34.99
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (2011) 29.14
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 28.70
Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol (2010) 27.58
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA (2004) 23.87
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 22.34
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (2009) 22.18
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2009) 21.74
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet (2007) 20.57
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 17.92
Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol (2010) 17.30
CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ (2004) 16.50
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med (2010) 16.11
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ (2007) 14.52
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 14.36
Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2008) 13.87
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol (2007) 13.46
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One (2008) 13.32
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg (2010) 12.98
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2009) 12.16
Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA (2006) 11.87
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 11.80
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 11.77
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med (2007) 11.51
Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med (2004) 11.47
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust (2006) 11.40
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ (2008) 11.08
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ (2003) 10.80
Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CMAJ (2004) 10.75
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2007) 10.43
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 10.32
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2003) 10.28
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 10.02
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 9.38
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med (2010) 9.30
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ (2013) 9.01
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med (2007) 8.77
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med (2003) 8.58
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med (2007) 8.46
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials (2012) 8.39
Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med (2006) 8.25
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med (2013) 8.21
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem (2003) 8.13
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem (2003) 7.92
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA (2009) 7.89
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2007) 7.87
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 7.86
Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS One (2009) 7.60
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ (2014) 7.55
Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ (2012) 7.47
Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med (2010) 7.43
Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ (2004) 7.33
Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ (2008) 7.30
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 7.20
Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 7.07
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 7.04
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ (2008) 6.99
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med (2010) 6.88
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2011) 6.80
Survival plots of time-to-event outcomes in clinical trials: good practice and pitfalls. Lancet (2002) 6.61
Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ (2003) 6.61
Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet (2005) 6.55
Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med (2006) 6.34
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies. J Clin Oncol (2005) 6.31
Hypothermia therapy after traumatic brain injury in children. N Engl J Med (2008) 6.10
The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 5.93
How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med (2007) 5.86
CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2008) 5.85
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 5.78
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology (2007) 5.77