A neurocomputational model for prostate carcinoma detection.

PubWeight™: 0.83‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 14584066)

Published in Cancer on November 01, 2003

Authors

Pankaj Kalra1, Joanna Togami, Gaurav Bansal B S, Alan W Partin, Michael K Brawer, Richard J Babaian, Lawrence S Ross, Craig S Niederberger

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.

Articles by these authors

(truncated to the top 100)

Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med (2012) 24.06

Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24. Nat Genet (2007) 19.18

Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA (2005) 8.72

Ligand-independent androgen receptor variants derived from splicing of cryptic exons signify hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res (2009) 7.11

Common sequence variants on 2p15 and Xp11.22 confer susceptibility to prostate cancer. Nat Genet (2008) 6.10

Germline mutations in HOXB13 and prostate-cancer risk. N Engl J Med (2012) 5.49

Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol (2011) 5.27

Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA (2008) 5.25

Two genome-wide association studies of aggressive prostate cancer implicate putative prostate tumor suppressor gene DAB2IP. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 4.85

Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol (2003) 4.66

Association between two unlinked loci at 8q24 and prostate cancer risk among European Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 4.24

African American men with very low-risk prostate cancer exhibit adverse oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy: should active surveillance still be an option for them? J Clin Oncol (2013) 4.20

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program. J Clin Oncol (2010) 4.17

Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology (2007) 4.02

Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. J Urol (2009) 3.95

Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol (2011) 3.36

Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on prostate tissue in men with late-onset hypogonadism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2006) 3.32

Obesity-related plasma hemodilution and PSA concentration among men with prostate cancer. JAMA (2007) 3.25

The Prostate cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial:VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy to watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Contemp Clin Trials (2008) 3.25

An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol (2004) 3.21

Evidence for two independent prostate cancer risk-associated loci in the HNF1B gene at 17q12. Nat Genet (2008) 3.14

Death in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: prostate-specific antigen doubling time subgroups and their associated contributions to all-cause mortality. J Clin Oncol (2007) 2.79

An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011. BJU Int (2012) 2.77

Germline mutations and sequence variants of the macrophage scavenger receptor 1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk. Nat Genet (2002) 2.76

Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int (2013) 2.69

The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up. BJU Int (2011) 2.68

Retracted EPCA-2: a highly specific serum marker for prostate cancer. Urology (2007) 2.67

Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance. J Urol (2013) 2.66

A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range. J Urol (2011) 2.65

PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome. J Urol (2008) 2.63

Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis. Cancer (2004) 2.61

Prediction of mortality after radical prostatectomy by Charlson comorbidity index. Urology (2010) 2.54

Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3): development and internal validation of a novel biopsy nomogram. Eur Urol (2009) 2.45

A prospective, multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [-2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2010) 2.36

PTEN protein loss by immunostaining: analytic validation and prognostic indicator for a high risk surgical cohort of prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res (2011) 2.35

Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vasal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia. Ann Surg (2005) 2.35

Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen. Urology (2010) 2.27

Metabolic factors associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2006) 2.17

Accuracy of PCA3 measurement in predicting short-term biopsy progression in an active surveillance program. J Urol (2009) 2.17

Obesity, weight gain, and risk of biochemical failure among prostate cancer patients following prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res (2005) 2.14

External validation of University of California, San Francisco, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score. Urology (2008) 2.04

Impact of surgical delay on long-term cancer control for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol (2004) 1.95

Individual and cumulative effect of prostate cancer risk-associated variants on clinicopathologic variables in 5,895 prostate cancer patients. Prostate (2009) 1.95

Initial prostate biopsy: development and internal validation of a biopsy-specific nomogram based on the prostate cancer antigen 3 assay. Eur Urol (2012) 1.81

Association of [-2]proPSA with biopsy reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer. J Urol (2012) 1.80

Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma: should it be labeled as cancer? J Clin Oncol (2012) 1.78

Adjuvant weekly docetaxel for patients with high risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional pilot study. J Urol (2007) 1.75

Association of prostate cancer risk variants with clinicopathologic characteristics of the disease. Clin Cancer Res (2008) 1.74

Indications for intervention during active surveillance of prostate cancer: a comparison of the Johns Hopkins and Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocols. BJU Int (2014) 1.73

Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2007) 1.72

Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of neoadjuvant celecoxib in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: evaluation of drug-specific biomarkers. J Clin Oncol (2009) 1.71

ProPSA and diagnostic biopsy tissue DNA content combination improves accuracy to predict need for prostate cancer treatment among men enrolled in an active surveillance program. Urology (2011) 1.71

Complexed prostate specific antigen improves specificity for prostate cancer detection: results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Urol (2003) 1.67

Validation of the partin nomogram for prostate cancer in a national sample. J Urol (2010) 1.64

Residual tumor potentially left behind after local ablation therapy in prostate adenocarcinoma. J Urol (2008) 1.63

Increased incidence of pathologically nonorgan confined prostate cancer in African-American men eligible for active surveillance. Urology (2013) 1.63

Long-term cancer control of radical prostatectomy in men younger than 50 years of age: update 2003. Urology (2003) 1.62

Causes of death after radical prostatectomy at a large tertiary center. J Urol (2012) 1.61

Nuclear roundness variance predicts prostate cancer progression, metastasis, and death: A prospective evaluation with up to 25 years of follow-up after radical prostatectomy. Prostate (2010) 1.60

Geometric evaluation of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol (2012) 1.59

Radical prostatectomy in older men: survival outcomes in septuagenarians and octogenarians. BJU Int (2010) 1.58

Substratification of stage T1C prostate cancer based on the probability of biochemical recurrence. Urology (2002) 1.56

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings in men with low-risk prostate cancer followed using active surveillance. BJU Int (2013) 1.55

Cumulative effect of five genetic variants on prostate cancer risk in multiple study populations. Prostate (2008) 1.53

African-American men with nonpalpable prostate cancer exhibit greater tumor volume than matched white men. Cancer (2006) 1.52

Copious pre-ejaculation: small glands--major headaches. J Androl (2007) 1.49

Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int (2013) 1.48

Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge. J Urol (2002) 1.47

The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted. J Urol (2010) 1.47

[-2]proenzyme prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection: a national cancer institute early detection research network validation study. J Urol (2008) 1.47

Pathological and oncologic outcomes for men with positive lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: The Johns Hopkins Hospital 30-year experience. Prostate (2013) 1.46

Proenzyme psa for the early detection of prostate cancer in the 2.5-4.0 ng/ml total psa range: preliminary analysis. Urology (2003) 1.46

Preoperative serum DNA GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation and the risk of early prostate-specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res (2005) 1.46

Free prostate-specific antigen in serum is becoming more complex. Urology (2002) 1.46

Biomarkers for prostate cancer. Annu Rev Med (2009) 1.45

Standardization of two immunoassays for human glandular kallikrein 2. Clin Chem (2003) 1.45

Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prognosis. Urology (2010) 1.44

Applying complexed prostate-specific antigen to clinical practice. Urology (2004) 1.44

Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores? J Urol (2002) 1.43

Trefoil factor 3 overexpression in prostatic carcinoma: prognostic importance using tissue microarrays. Prostate (2004) 1.43

Time to prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy and risk of prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol (2006) 1.42

Trends in immediate perioperative morbidity and delay in discharge after open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP): a 20-year institutional experience. BJU Int (2013) 1.42

Modeling grade progression in an active surveillance study. Stat Med (2013) 1.41

Saw palmetto alters nuclear measurements reflecting DNA content in men with symptomatic BPH: evidence for a possible molecular mechanism. Urology (2002) 1.41

Is it possible to compare PSA recurrence-free survival after surgery and radiotherapy using revised ASTRO criterion--"nadir + 2"? Urology (2008) 1.40

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis. J Urol (2013) 1.40

Obesity and risk of biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy at a tertiary care referral center. J Urol (2005) 1.40

Observed effect of age and body mass index on total and complexed PSA: analysis from a national screening program. Urology (2005) 1.37

Study design of the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (MTOPS) trial. Control Clin Trials (2003) 1.33

Radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3a disease. Cancer (2007) 1.32

Promoter hypermethylation as an independent prognostic factor for relapse in patients with prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res (2005) 1.30

Evaluation of proprostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer in men with a total prostate specific antigen range of 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml. J Urol (2003) 1.30

Treatment decision-making for localized prostate cancer: what younger men choose and why. Prostate (2011) 1.30

Pathological outcomes and biochemical progression in men with T1c prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with prostate specific antigen 2.6 to 4.0 vs 4.1 to 6.0 ng/ml. J Urol (2006) 1.29

Impact of fellowship training on pathologic outcomes and complication rates of radical prostatectomy. Cancer (2006) 1.27

Natural history of pathologically organ-confined (pT2), Gleason score 6 or less, prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Urology (2008) 1.27

Vasectomy: AUA guideline. J Urol (2012) 1.27

Contemporary evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk classification system. Urology (2012) 1.26

Pro-prostate-specific antigen measurements in serum and tissue are associated with treatment necessity among men enrolled in expectant management for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2009) 1.26

Association between sequence variants at 17q12 and 17q24.3 and prostate cancer risk in European and African Americans. Prostate (2008) 1.24