Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods.

PubWeight™: 1.12‹?› | Rank: Top 10%

🔗 View Article (PMC 3142997)

Published in AJR Am J Roentgenol on February 01, 2005

Authors

R Edward Hendrick1, Gary R Cutter, Eric A Berns, Connie Nakano, Joseph Egger, Patricia A Carney, Linn Abraham, Stephen H Taplin, Carl J D'Orsi, William Barlow, Joann G Elmore

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Radiology, Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Galter Pavilion, 13th Floor, 251 E Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611, USA. ehendrick@radiology.northwestern.edu

Articles cited by this

Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1997) 7.62

Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology (1994) 2.91

The New Hampshire Mammography Network: the development and design of a population-based registry. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1996) 2.31

Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 1.97

Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network. Radiology (2000) 1.96

Mammography diffusion and trends in late-stage breast cancer: evaluating outcomes in a population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (1997) 1.44

Breast cancer screening in 21 countries: delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainment. Eur J Cancer Prev (1999) 1.23

Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2003) 1.19

Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities. Radiology (1994) 1.09

Independent double reading of screening mammograms. J Med Screen (1995) 1.08

Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independent double interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2000) 1.01

Providing professional mammography services: financial analysis. Radiology (2001) 0.92

Improvement in mammography quality control: 1987-1995. Radiology (1998) 0.88

Mammography in New Hampshire: characteristics of the women and the exams they receive. J Community Health (2000) 0.82

Articles by these authors

Release from prison--a high risk of death for former inmates. N Engl J Med (2007) 12.46

Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med (2007) 8.58

Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med (2012) 7.49

Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 6.28

Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2003) 6.01

Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology (2008) 5.59

Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 5.17

Declines in invasive breast cancer and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a screening mammography population. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 5.08

Building a research consortium of large health systems: the Cancer Research Network. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2005) 4.92

Relation of visual function to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Ophthalmology (2006) 4.72

Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology (2006) 4.41

Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 4.31

Antibiotic use in relation to the risk of breast cancer. JAMA (2004) 4.28

Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 4.07

Open notes: doctors and patients signing on. Ann Intern Med (2010) 3.99

Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med (2006) 3.95

Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst (2011) 3.62

Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: patients and doctors look ahead: patient and physician surveys. Ann Intern Med (2011) 3.55

Influenza vaccination and risk of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent elderly people: a population-based, nested case-control study. Lancet (2008) 3.23

Completion of therapy by Medicare patients with stage III colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 3.18

Hormone replacement therapy in relation to breast cancer. JAMA (2002) 3.14

Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol (2010) 2.96

Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern? Cancer (2007) 2.91

Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology (2009) 2.88

Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.86

Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. Radiology (2005) 2.85

Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 2.84

Comparison of clinical interpretation with visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice: the Assessing Angiography (A2) project. Circulation (2013) 2.81

Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 2.78

When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation. Radiology (2009) 2.78

International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 2.75

Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 2.75

A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2003) 2.71

The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history. J Am Coll Radiol (2009) 2.68

In search of the perfect comorbidity measure for use with administrative claims data: does it exist? Med Care (2006) 2.53

Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a cancer research network project. J Clin Oncol (2005) 2.51

Early inhaled nitric oxide therapy in premature newborns with respiratory failure. N Engl J Med (2006) 2.50

American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology (2005) 2.42

Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology (2002) 2.36

Recommendations for myasthenia gravis clinical trials. Muscle Nerve (2012) 2.28

Magnetic resonance imaging as a potential surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analytic approach. Ann Neurol (2009) 2.18

To seek perfection or not? That is the question. Radiology (2012) 2.15

Coordinating care across diseases, settings, and clinicians: a key role for the generalist in practice. Ann Intern Med (2005) 2.09

Explaining black-white differences in receipt of recommended colon cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.08

Randomized study combining interferon and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol (2013) 2.08

Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics. JAMA (2004) 2.07

Predictors of urinary tract infection after menopause: a prospective study. Am J Med (2004) 2.03

Prognostic characteristics of breast cancer among postmenopausal hormone users in a screened population. J Clin Oncol (2003) 2.02

Risk of serious injury for young baseball pitchers: a 10-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med (2010) 2.02

Insurance + access not equal to health care: typology of barriers to health care access for low-income families. Ann Fam Med (2007) 2.01

Behavior change counseling curricula for medical trainees: a systematic review. Acad Med (2012) 1.97

Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 1.95

Gender differences in chronic medical, psychiatric, and substance-dependence disorders among jail inmates. Am J Public Health (2009) 1.93

Rekindling student interest in generalist careers. Ann Intern Med (2005) 1.92

Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer (2006) 1.92

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography. Radiology (2005) 1.87

Macular volume determined by optical coherence tomography as a measure of neuronal loss in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol (2009) 1.85

Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2010) 1.84

Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology (2011) 1.81

Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst (2012) 1.80

Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2012) 1.80

Inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants: an individual-patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Pediatrics (2011) 1.79

Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 1.76

Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2010) 1.75

Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up. Radiology (2005) 1.75

Bias associated with self-report of prior screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2009) 1.75

Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2005) 1.74

Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship. Arch Surg (2007) 1.73

Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 1.70

Requiring an amyloid-beta1-42 biomarker for prodromal Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment does not lead to more efficient clinical trials. Alzheimers Dement (2010) 1.70

Benign breast disease--the risks of communicating risk. N Engl J Med (2005) 1.70