Published in J Am Coll Radiol on December 01, 2009
Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology (2011) 2.69
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology (2015) 1.68
Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2012) 1.66
Automated breast segmentation of fat and water MR images using dynamic programming. Acad Radiol (2015) 1.65
Characterizing upper urinary tract dilation on ultrasound: a survey of North American pediatric radiologists' practices. Pediatr Radiol (2014) 1.30
A comprehensive methodology for determining the most informative mammographic features. J Digit Imaging (2013) 0.98
From guidelines to practice: how reporting templates promote the use of radiology practice guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol (2013) 0.96
Variation in diagnostic performance among radiologists at screening CT colonography. Radiology (2013) 0.91
Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports? Acad Radiol (2014) 0.86
Code Abdomen: An Assessment Coding Scheme for Abdominal Imaging Findings Possibly Representing Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol (2015) 0.84
ACR BI-RADS for breast imaging communication: a roadmap for the rest of radiology. J Am Coll Radiol (2009) 0.84
Development of an online, publicly accessible naive Bayesian decision support tool for mammographic mass lesions based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) BI-RADS lexicon. Eur Radiol (2015) 0.84
The practical application of the UK 5-point scoring system for breast imaging: how standardisation of reporting supports the multidisciplinary team. Br J Radiol (2011) 0.82
A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation. Int J Breast Cancer (2015) 0.81
Using multidimensional mutual information to prioritize mammographic features for breast cancer diagnosis. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2013) 0.80
Comparing Mammography Abnormality Features to Genetic Variants in the Prediction of Breast Cancer in Women Recommended for Breast Biopsy. Acad Radiol (2015) 0.80
Carotid artery stenosis: wide variability in reporting formats--a review of 127 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Radiology (2012) 0.78
PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting. J Digit Imaging (2016) 0.78
Development, implementation, and evaluation of a structured reporting web tool for abdominal aortic aneurysms. JMIR Res Protoc (2013) 0.77
Breast Imaging in the Era of Big Data: Structured Reporting and Data Mining. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2015) 0.77
Molecular imaging of breast cancer: present and future directions. Front Chem (2014) 0.76
The importance of standardized interpretation of molecular breast imaging with dedicated gamma cameras. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2012) 0.76
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma staging. Cancer Imaging (2013) 0.76
Evaluation of the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH-Dx) classification scheme for diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms: Results from the International Melanoma Pathology Study Group. J Am Acad Dermatol (2016) 0.76
Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support. J Biomed Inform (2016) 0.75
Perirenal Edema as a potential hint towards primary hypertension-Preliminary findings in MRI breast cancer staging. Eur J Radiol Open (2016) 0.75
Workflow Lexicons in Healthcare: Validation of the SWIM Lexicon. J Digit Imaging (2017) 0.75
The value of "constant sharpness" as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography. Eur J Radiol Open (2016) 0.75
DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and MRS in Cancer: Challenges and Advantages of Implementing Qualitative and Quantitative Multi-parametric Imaging in the Clinic. Top Magn Reson Imaging (2016) 0.75
External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets. Med Phys (2015) 0.75
Focal transitional mastitis in MR-Mammography: Preliminary findings. Eur J Radiol Open (2016) 0.75
Can we apply the MRI BI-RADS lexicon morphology descriptors on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? Br J Radiol (2016) 0.75
Developing a comprehensive database management system for organization and evaluation of mammography datasets. Cancer Inform (2014) 0.75
Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk in New South Wales North Coast Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. J Med Radiat Sci (2016) 0.75
A 10-Item Checklist Improves Reporting of Critical Procedural Elements during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor. J Urol (2016) 0.75
Shear wave elastography combined with the thyroid imaging reporting and data system for malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules. Oncotarget (2017) 0.75
Medical auditing of whole-breast screening ultrasonography. Ultrasonography (2017) 0.75
Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology (1995) 7.12
RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics (2006) 6.20
Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst (2000) 4.98
Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology (1991) 4.84
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology (2006) 3.42
The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology (2007) 2.99
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology (2006) 2.94
Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology (2007) 2.65
The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1991) 2.63
The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1998) 2.47
Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1996) 2.46
Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology (2002) 2.36
Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology (2007) 1.99
Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging (2001) 1.89
Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology (2009) 1.84
Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol (2008) 1.70
Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology (2002) 1.63
Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease. Radiology (2002) 1.53
Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics (2006) 1.48
Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging (2008) 1.47
The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the only tree. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1994) 1.47
National trends and practices in breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2008) 1.46
Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology (1995) 1.43
Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 1.32
Survey of radiology residents: breast imaging training and attitudes. Radiology (2003) 1.26
Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Med Decis Making (1991) 1.16
A proposal for a national mammography database: content, purpose, and value. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1995) 1.16
Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol (2001) 1.13
Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns. A study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller. Cancer (1985) 1.12
Breast cancer prediction and the Wolfe classification of mammograms. JAMA (1985) 1.11
Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology (1995) 1.11
Mammography 1984: challenge to radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1984) 1.08
Correlation between breast parenchymal patterns and mammographers' certainty of diagnosis. Invest Radiol (1988) 1.07
Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. Radiology (1992) 1.06
Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health (1998) 1.06
Mammography in the eighties. Radiology (1990) 1.06
Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology (2001) 1.04
Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol (1988) 0.97
Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study. Magn Reson Med (2008) 0.96
Quality of breast imaging reports falls short of recommended standards. Breast (2007) 0.93
Mammography interpretation: the BI-RADS method. Am Fam Physician (1997) 0.91
BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues. Radiol Clin North Am (2007) 0.91
Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2008) 0.90
Mammographic patterns and risk of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1978) 0.90
Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer as a result of normal mammograms. Arch Surg (1983) 0.89
Using a Bayesian network to predict the probability and type of breast cancer represented by microcalcifications on mammography. Stud Health Technol Inform (2004) 0.89
Progress report from the American College of Radiology Breast MR Imaging Lexicon Committee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am (2001) 0.87
The technical quality of mammography in centers participating in a regional breast cancer awareness program. Radiographics (1988) 0.84
Computerized follow-up of abnormalities detected at mammography screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1990) 0.84
State certification of mammography facilities. Final rule. Fed Regist (2002) 0.84
The usefulness of computers in managing the operation of a mammography screening practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1990) 0.82
The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the wrong tree? AJR Am J Roentgenol (1994) 0.81
Requirements for accrediting bodies of mammography facilities--FDA. Interim rule with request for comments. Fed Regist (1993) 0.81
BI-RADS lexicon reemphasized. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2006) 0.80
American College Of Radiology/Society of Breast Imaging curriculum for resident and fellow education in breast imaging. J Am Coll Radiol (2006) 0.80
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA (2008) 10.92
BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse. Nucleic Acids Res (2009) 10.58
Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med (2007) 8.58
American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol (2007) 6.70
Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2002) 6.51
PharmGKB: the Pharmacogenetics Knowledge Base. Nucleic Acids Res (2002) 6.40
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology (2008) 5.59
An integrative approach for in silico glioma research. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (2010) 4.55
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA (2003) 4.53
Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology (2006) 4.41
Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 4.31
The caBIG annotation and image Markup project. J Digit Imaging (2009) 3.64
Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 3.41
Non-small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data--methods and preliminary results. Radiology (2012) 2.98
Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology (2012) 2.94
Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology (2009) 2.88
Staging system for breast cancer: revisions for the 6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Surg Clin North Am (2003) 2.82
Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 2.78
When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation. Radiology (2009) 2.78
Curbing potential radiation-induced cancer risks in oncologic imaging: perspectives from the 'image gently' and 'image wisely' campaigns. Oncology (Williston Park) (2014) 2.76
International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 2.75
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.72
Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA (2006) 2.53
American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology (2005) 2.42
Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology (2002) 2.36
Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology (2005) 2.33
The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation. Radiology (2013) 2.27
MScanner: a classifier for retrieving Medline citations. BMC Bioinformatics (2008) 2.24
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol (2008) 2.22
Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. Radiology (2012) 2.20
Consensus conference on breast conservation. J Am Coll Surg (2006) 2.17
The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2008) 2.16
To seek perfection or not? That is the question. Radiology (2012) 2.15
Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology (2010) 2.13
Challenges in converting frame-based ontology into OWL: the Foundational Model of Anatomy case-study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2005) 2.10
The Biomedical Resource Ontology (BRO) to enable resource discovery in clinical and translational research. J Biomed Inform (2010) 2.10
Technologist-performed handheld screening breast US imaging: how is it performed and what are the outcomes to date? Radiology (2014) 2.10
Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin (2002) 2.07
Benefit of semiannual ipsilateral mammographic surveillance following breast conservation therapy. Radiology (2012) 2.07
Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology (2010) 2.06
Ontology-based annotation and query of tissue microarray data. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2006) 2.05
Annotation and query of tissue microarray data using the NCI Thesaurus. BMC Bioinformatics (2007) 2.03
In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging (2002) 2.01
Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology (2007) 1.99
The Annotation and Image Mark-up project. Radiology (2009) 1.93
Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography. Radiology (2005) 1.87
Evaluation of detector dynamic range in the x-ray exposure domain in mammography: a comparison between film-screen and flat panel detector systems. Med Phys (2003) 1.85
Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology (2009) 1.84
Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology (2011) 1.81
Content-based image retrieval in radiology: current status and future directions. J Digit Imaging (2011) 1.78
MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set. Radiology (2013) 1.77
Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up. Radiology (2005) 1.75
Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology (2005) 1.70
Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology (2002) 1.63
Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 1.61
The IR RadLex project: an interventional radiology lexicon--a collaborative project of the Radiological Society of North America and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol (2008) 1.61
Automated retrieval of CT images of liver lesions on the basis of image similarity: method and preliminary results. Radiology (2010) 1.59
Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening. Radiology (2003) 1.55
BioPortal: ontologies and data resources with the click of a mouse. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2008) 1.54
Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease. Radiology (2002) 1.53
Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of chest irradiation. Radiology (2011) 1.53
Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience. Radiology (2006) 1.49
Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance? AJR Am J Roentgenol (2010) 1.49
Short-interval follow-up mammography: are we doing the right thing? J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 1.49
Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys (2007) 1.46
A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40 to 79 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2004) 1.46
The ACR/Society of Breast Imaging Resident and Fellowship Training Curriculum for Breast Imaging, updated. J Am Coll Radiol (2012) 1.40
Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology (2006) 1.39
Professional and economic factors affecting access to mammography: a crisis today, or tomorrow? Results from a national survey. Cancer (2005) 1.38
Practice guidelines: the radiology perspective. J Am Coll Radiol (2004) 1.37
Imaging characteristics of malignant lesions of the male breast. Radiographics (2006) 1.33
Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). CA Cancer J Clin (2002) 1.32
An ontology for PACS integration. J Digit Imaging (2006) 1.30
Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology (2006) 1.29
Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2010) 1.29
Prognostic PET 18F-FDG uptake imaging features are associated with major oncogenomic alterations in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res (2012) 1.28
Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype. Med Phys (2010) 1.27
Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol (2004) 1.22
The place of medical image perception in 21st-century health care. J Am Coll Radiol (2006) 1.21
Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression. Radiology (2008) 1.21
Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 1.20
Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2006) 1.20
LesionViewer: a tool for tracking cancer lesions over time. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2007) 1.18
Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology (2007) 1.18
The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2010) 1.18
Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 1.17
Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2010) 1.17
The role of informatics in health care reform. Acad Radiol (2012) 1.17
A randomized clinical trial to assess the benefit of offering on-site mobile mammography in addition to health education for older women. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 1.16