A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus.

PubWeight™: 1.74‹?› | Rank: Top 3%

🔗 View Article (PMID 16291467)

Published in J Clin Epidemiol on October 13, 2005

Authors

Isabelle Boutron1, David Moher, Peter Tugwell, Bruno Giraudeau, Serge Poiraudeau, Remy Nizard, Philippe Ravaud

Author Affiliations

1: INSERM U738, Paris, France. isabelle.boutron@bch.ap-hop-paris.fr

Articles citing this

Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med (2010) 7.43

Low intensity pulsed ultrasonography for fractures: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2009) 2.15

Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments. PLoS Med (2007) 1.77

Reduction of diabetes risk in routine clinical practice: are physical activity and nutrition interventions feasible and are the outcomes from reference trials replicable? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health (2010) 1.46

Methods of blinding in reports of randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacologic treatments: a systematic review. PLoS Med (2006) 1.31

Development of an instrument to assess the quality of acupuncture: results from a Delphi process. J Altern Complement Med (2011) 1.13

Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Acta Orthop (2010) 1.06

Checklists to improve the quality of the orthopaedic literature. Indian J Orthop (2008) 1.05

Meditative therapies for reducing anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Depress Anxiety (2012) 1.04

Yoga for chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Res Manag (2013) 1.04

A systematic review of nonrandomized controlled trials on the curative effects of aquatic exercise. Int J Gen Med (2011) 0.97

Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Med Res Methodol (2009) 0.96

A Systematic Review of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autograft Compared With Allograft in Young Patients. Sports Health (2015) 0.93

AQUILA: assessment of quality in lower limb arthroplasty. An expert Delphi consensus for total knee and total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2011) 0.92

Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol (2013) 0.92

All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 0.91

Neglected external validity in reports of randomized trials: the example of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2009) 0.90

Effectiveness of comprehensive health education combining lifestyle education and hot spa bathing for male white-collar employees: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. J Epidemiol (2009) 0.86

Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part III. Overcoming operational challenges in the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2012) 0.85

Evaluating causal relationships between urban built environment characteristics and obesity: a methodological review of observational studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act (2014) 0.81

Development and evaluation of a pedagogical tool to improve understanding of a quality checklist: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS Clin Trials (2007) 0.81

Primary care-based educational interventions to decrease risk factors for metabolic syndrome for adults with major psychotic and/or affective disorders: a systematic review. Syst Rev (2013) 0.81

A Systematic Review of Reporting Tools Applicable to Sexual and Reproductive Health Programmes: Step 1 in Developing Programme Reporting Standards. PLoS One (2015) 0.80

Reflections 1 year into the 21-Center National Institutes of Health--funded WRIST study: a primer on conducting a multicenter clinical trial. J Hand Surg Am (2013) 0.80

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on curative and health enhancement effects of forest therapy. Psychol Res Behav Manag (2012) 0.79

Effectiveness of intervention for low back pain in female caregivers in nursing homes: a pilot trial based on multicenter randomization. Environ Health Prev Med (2010) 0.78

Balneotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis-a systematic review. Int J Biometeorol (2015) 0.78

OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Key analytic considerations in design, analysis, and reporting of randomized controlled trials in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage (2015) 0.78

Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol (2017) 0.77

Development of a framework for reporting health service models for managing rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol (2009) 0.77

Methodological choices for the clinical development of medical devices. Med Devices (Auckl) (2014) 0.75

Lessons from the infuse trials: do we need a classification of bias in scientific publications and editorials? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2014) 0.75

Specific or general exercise strategy for subacromial impingement syndrome-does it matter? A systematic literature review and meta analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2017) 0.75

Evaluation of the efficacy of a short-course, personalized self-management and intensive spa therapy intervention as active prevention of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities (Muska): a research protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2016) 0.75

Cochrane in CORR®: surgery for rotator cuff disease (review). Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 0.75

Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls. Syst Rev (2015) 0.75

What should urologists know about evidence-based medicine? Indian J Urol (2011) 0.75

Increased Mortality in Metal-on-Metal versus Non-Metal-on-Metal Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty at 10 Years and Longer Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One (2016) 0.75

The VEPRO trial: a cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia. Trials (2008) 0.75

Articles by these authors

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (2011) 29.14

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 22.34

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (2009) 22.18

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2009) 21.74

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med (2010) 16.11

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2008) 13.87

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol (2007) 13.46

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg (2010) 12.98

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2009) 12.16

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 11.80

Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med (2004) 11.47

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust (2006) 11.40

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ (2003) 10.80

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2003) 10.28

Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ (2008) 9.98

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med (2010) 9.30

American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) (2012) 9.25

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ (2013) 9.01

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med (2003) 8.58

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials (2012) 8.39

SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med (2013) 8.21

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem (2003) 8.13

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem (2003) 7.92

Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA (2009) 7.89

Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ (2014) 7.55

Campaign to revitalise academic medicine kicks off. BMJ (2004) 6.94

A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J (2003) 6.88

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med (2010) 6.88

Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2011) 6.80

Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med (2006) 6.34

American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum (2011) 6.28

Hypothermia therapy after traumatic brain injury in children. N Engl J Med (2008) 6.10

Rituximab versus azathioprine for maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med (2014) 5.98

The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 5.93

How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med (2007) 5.86

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2008) 5.85

GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 5.78

Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (2012) 5.65

Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA (2013) 4.98

The use of aspirin for primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a systematic review prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2007) 4.74

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA (2010) 4.56

The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med (2015) 4.49

Who cares about academic medicine? BMJ (2004) 4.46

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med (2009) 4.43

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev (2012) 4.36

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials (2010) 4.28

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health (2013) 4.22

CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet (2008) 4.20

Reporting of safety results in published reports of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med (2009) 4.19

Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'. Trials (2008) 4.17

American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis (2011) 4.15

Open letter to the leader of academic medicine. BMJ (2007) 4.06

An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 3.98

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 3.96

Five futures for academic medicine. PLoS Med (2005) 3.95

Public availability of results of trials assessing cancer drugs in the United States. J Clin Oncol (2013) 3.73

CONSORT 2010 changes and testing blindness in RCTs. Lancet (2010) 3.68

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a systematic review prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2007) 3.64

Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. PLoS Med (2010) 3.63

Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Ann Intern Med (2008) 3.63

Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med (2012) 3.63

Oral ivermectin versus malathion lotion for difficult-to-treat head lice. N Engl J Med (2010) 3.62

Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees. CMAJ (2010) 3.57

Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D in relation to bone health. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) (2007) 3.51

Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. IX: Summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev (2002) 3.46

Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 3.44

ERCC1 codon 118 polymorphism is a predictive factor for the tumor response to oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2005) 3.44

Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 3.37

The prevalence of celiac disease in average-risk and at-risk Western European populations: a systematic review. Gastroenterology (2005) 3.33

The diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease: a systematic review. Gastroenterology (2005) 3.33

Misrepresentation of randomized controlled trials in press releases and news coverage: a cohort study. PLoS Med (2012) 3.33

Guidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network's survey of guideline authors. PLoS Med (2008) 3.22

EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet (2008) 3.15

Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther (2009) 3.15

An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet (2010) 3.12

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial of amoxicillin for clinically diagnosed acute otitis media in children 6 months to 5 years of age. CMAJ (2005) 3.10

Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? J Clin Epidemiol (2003) 3.06

Quality of life of individuals with heart failure: a randomized trial of the effectiveness of two models of hospital-to-home transition. Med Care (2002) 3.05

A randomized trial of aspirin on the risk of embolic events in patients with infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol (2003) 3.02

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg (2011) 3.00

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Fam Pract (2004) 2.99

The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev (2012) 2.86

Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J (2005) 2.83

Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev (2012) 2.81

The Good Clinical Practice guideline: a bronze standard for clinical research. Lancet (2005) 2.81

What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health (2012) 2.80

Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA (2006) 2.79

Prolonged therapeutic hypothermia after traumatic brain injury in adults: a systematic review. JAMA (2003) 2.73

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Radiology (2003) 2.73

Safety and efficacy of rituximab in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from 136 patients from the French AutoImmunity and Rituximab registry. Arthritis Rheum (2010) 2.68

Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 2.62

Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 2.61

Metformin use and mortality among patients with diabetes and atherothrombosis. Arch Intern Med (2010) 2.52

What are the characteristics of patients with severe, symptomatic, mitral regurgitation who are denied surgery? Eur Heart J (2007) 2.52

Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? Trials (2009) 2.52