Published in Health Res Policy Syst on December 16, 2009
Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci (2012) 7.17
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.93
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.34
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 3: Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.84
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development. PLoS Med (2012) 1.81
Contribution mapping: a method for mapping the contribution of research to enhance its impact. Health Res Policy Syst (2012) 1.79
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: linking guidance development to policy development. PLoS Med (2012) 1.68
What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? A qualitative study. Implement Sci (2013) 1.66
Use of health systems and policy research evidence in the health policymaking in eastern Mediterranean countries: views and practices of researchers. Implement Sci (2012) 1.66
Climate for evidence-informed health systems: A print media analysis in 44 low- and middle-income countries that host knowledge-translation platforms. Health Res Policy Syst (2011) 1.63
Implementation research evidence uptake and use for policy-making. Health Res Policy Syst (2012) 1.58
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.54
Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Bull World Health Organ (2013) 1.35
Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy. BMC Public Health (2014) 1.27
Capturing lessons learned from evidence-to-policy initiatives through structured reflection. Health Res Policy Syst (2014) 1.21
Where there is no evidence: use of expert consensus methods to fill the evidence gap in low-income countries and cultural minorities. Int J Ment Health Syst (2010) 1.12
A multi-faceted approach to promote knowledge translation platforms in eastern Mediterranean countries: climate for evidence-informed policy. Health Res Policy Syst (2012) 1.08
Development of evidence-based health policy documents in developing countries: a case of Iran. Glob J Health Sci (2014) 1.01
Use of evidence to support healthy public policy: a policy effectiveness-feasibility loop. Bull World Health Organ (2012) 0.96
Deliberative dialogues as a strategy for system-level knowledge translation and exchange. Healthc Policy (2014) 0.90
Implementation of a health policy advisory committee as a knowledge translation platform: the Nigeria experience. Int J Health Policy Manag (2015) 0.84
Moving knowledge about family violence into public health policy and practice: a mixed method study of a deliberative dialogue. Health Res Policy Syst (2016) 0.83
Evidence-informed Health Policy Making: The Role of Policy Brief. Int J Prev Med (2012) 0.82
Applying knowledge translation tools to inform policy: the case of mental health in Lebanon. Health Res Policy Syst (2015) 0.82
Enhancing evidence informed policymaking in complex health systems: lessons from multi-site collaborative approaches. Health Res Policy Syst (2016) 0.82
Exploring the use of research evidence in health-enhancing physical activity policies. Health Res Policy Syst (2015) 0.81
The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation's capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy. Health Res Policy Syst (2016) 0.81
Policy development, implementation and evaluation by the AIDS control program in Uganda: a review of the processes. Health Res Policy Syst (2013) 0.80
Bridging the gap between science and policy: an international survey of scientists and policy makers in China and Canada. Implement Sci (2016) 0.80
How can collaboration be strengthened between public health and primary care? A Dutch multiple case study in seven neighbourhoods. BMC Public Health (2015) 0.78
Seeing the forests and the trees--innovative approaches to exploring heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions to enhance health system decision-making: a protocol. Syst Rev (2014) 0.77
Development of training for medicines-oriented policymakers to apply evidence. Health Res Policy Syst (2016) 0.77
Assessing policy dialogues and the role of context: Liberian case study before and during the Ebola outbreak. BMC Health Serv Res (2016) 0.77
Enhancing capacity for risk factor surveillance at the regional/local level: a follow-up review of the findings of the Canadian Think Tank Forum after 4 years. Arch Public Health (2014) 0.76
Developing Community-Based Rehabilitation Programs for Musculoskeletal Diseases in Low-Income Areas of Mexico: The Community-Based Rehabilitation for Low-Income Communities Living With Rheumatic Diseases (CONCORD) Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc (2014) 0.76
The use of a policy dialogue to facilitate evidence-informed policy development for improved access to care: the case of the Winnipeg Central Intake Service (WCIS). Health Res Policy Syst (2016) 0.75
Policy dialogues - the "bolts and joints" of policy-making: experiences from Cabo Verde, Chad and Mali. BMC Health Serv Res (2016) 0.75
Policy dialogue to improve health outcomes in low income countries: what are the issues and way forward? BMC Health Serv Res (2016) 0.75
Conditions for sustainability of Academic Collaborative Centres for Public Health in the Netherlands: a mixed methods design. Health Res Policy Syst (2015) 0.75
Perspectives on health policy dialogue: definition, perceived importance and coordination. BMC Health Serv Res (2016) 0.75
Promoting Evidence to Policy Link on the Control of Infectious Diseases of Poverty in Nigeria: Outcome of A Multi-Stakeholders Policy Dialogue. Health Promot Perspect (2015) 0.75
Evaluation of a training program for medicines-oriented policymakers to use a database of systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst (2016) 0.75
Improved harmonisation from policy dialogue? Realist perspectives from Guinea and Chad. BMC Health Serv Res (2016) 0.75
An interpretive review of consensus statements on clinical guideline development and their application in the field of traditional and complementary medicine. BMC Complement Altern Med (2017) 0.75
Enhancing evidence use in public health nutrition policymaking: theoretical insights from a New Zealand case study. Health Res Policy Syst (2016) 0.75
The Life Science Exchange: a case study of a sectoral and sub-sectoral knowledge exchange programme. Health Res Policy Syst (2016) 0.75
Expanding the evidence base for global recommendations on health systems: strengths and challenges of the OptimizeMNH guidance process. Implement Sci (2016) 0.75
Knowledge mobilisation for policy development: implementing systems approaches through participatory dynamic simulation modelling. Health Res Policy Syst (2017) 0.75
Teasing apart "the tangled web" of influence of policy dialogues: lessons from a case study of dialogues about healthcare reform options for Canada. Implement Sci (2017) 0.75
Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy (2005) 12.22
The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Res Policy Syst (2003) 7.06
Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet (2004) 6.77
Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med (2003) 6.00
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.93
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.34
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.93
Consensus development methods: a review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy (1999) 2.66
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.24
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.15
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.87
Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development. Aust New Zealand Health Policy (2008) 1.70
Moving forward on both systematic reviews and deliberative processes. Healthc Policy (2006) 1.45
Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: results from a Canadian comparative study. Soc Sci Med (2007) 1.45
Decision support: a new approach to making the best healthcare management and policy choices. Healthc Q (2007) 1.24
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (2011) 29.14
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 11.77
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 10.32
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 10.02
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ (2008) 9.98
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 7.86
Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ (2008) 7.30
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 7.20
Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 7.07
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ (2008) 6.99
Use of evidence in WHO recommendations. Lancet (2007) 6.12
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 5.78
Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ (2009) 5.68
Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med (2007) 5.63
Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 5.57
An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2006) 5.29
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ (2008) 5.16
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 5.10
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.93
Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations. CMAJ (2003) 3.92
The female community health volunteer programme in Nepal: decision makers' perceptions of volunteerism, payment and other incentives. Soc Sci Med (2010) 3.91
The OFF theory of research utilization. J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 3.79
Task shifting of antiretroviral treatment from doctors to primary-care nurses in South Africa (STRETCH): a pragmatic, parallel, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet (2012) 3.69
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. CMAJ (2009) 3.65
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 3.60
GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 3.58
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.54
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.44
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.34
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking? Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.32
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 3.31
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.30
Supporting the delivery of cost-effective interventions in primary health-care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Lancet (2008) 3.28
Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ (2010) 3.27
Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Med (2009) 3.04
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.02
A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci (2013) 3.00
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.93
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.91
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 2.85
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.83
Non-specialist health worker interventions for the care of mental, neurological and substance-abuse disorders in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 2.67
Rational prescribing in primary care (RaPP): a cluster randomized trial of a tailored intervention. PLoS Med (2006) 2.67
Cluster randomised controlled trial of tailored interventions to improve the management of urinary tract infections in women and sore throat. BMJ (2002) 2.58
Transparent development of the WHO rapid advice guidelines. PLoS Med (2007) 2.57
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 2.53
Translating research into policy and practice in developing countries: a case study of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.50
Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries . Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 2.49
Thirty years after Alma-Ata: a systematic review of the impact of community health workers delivering curative interventions against malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea on child mortality and morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa. Hum Resour Health (2011) 2.47
GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 2.46
Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 2.34
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.29
Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol (2008) 2.28
Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care (2006) 2.27
Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci (2013) 2.25
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.24
[Guidelines for pharmacological primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases--who should be treated?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2002) 2.22
[Which antihypertensive drugs should be used in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2002) 2.20
[Which cholesterol-lowering drugs should be used in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2002) 2.19
Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res (2012) 2.16
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 4: Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.15
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.15
Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci (2008) 2.15
HARLOT plc: an amalgamation of the world's two oldest professions. BMJ (2003) 2.14
User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 2.12
A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS? BMC Public Health (2007) 2.11
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.05
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 10: Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.03
SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 6: Using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.02
The emergence of community health worker programmes in the late apartheid era in South Africa: An historical analysis. Soc Sci Med (2010) 2.02
SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 11: Finding and using evidence about local conditions. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.00
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 7: Finding systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.99
Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ (2010) 1.94
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ (2008) 1.94