Published in J Am Coll Radiol on June 01, 2006
Current perspectives in medical image perception. Atten Percept Psychophys (2010) 1.08
Satisfaction of search for subtle skeletal fractures may not be induced by more serious skeletal injury. J Am Coll Radiol (2012) 0.85
Content-based image retrieval in radiology: analysis of variability in human perception of similarity. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) (2015) 0.82
Quantified visual scoring of metastatic melanoma patient treatment response using computed tomography: improving on the current standard. J Digit Imaging (2012) 0.77
Investigation of viewing procedures for interpretation of breast tomosynthesis image volumes: a detection-task study with eye tracking. Eur Radiol (2012) 0.76
Special Section Guest Editorial:Medical Image Perception: Understanding How Radiologists Understand Images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) (2016) 0.75
Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med (2007) 8.58
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA (2003) 4.53
Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology (2006) 4.41
Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 4.31
Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. Hum Pathol (2009) 3.91
Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 3.41
Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology (2009) 2.88
When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation. Radiology (2009) 2.78
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.72
The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history. J Am Coll Radiol (2009) 2.68
Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology (2002) 2.36
The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation. Radiology (2013) 2.27
To seek perfection or not? That is the question. Radiology (2012) 2.15
Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities: analysis of components of variance. Acad Radiol (2002) 2.12
Benefit of semiannual ipsilateral mammographic surveillance following breast conservation therapy. Radiology (2012) 2.07
Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology (2010) 2.06
An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study. Hum Pathol (2004) 1.98
Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology (2011) 1.81
Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up. Radiology (2005) 1.75
Assessment methodologies and statistical issues for computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodules in computed tomography: contemporary research topics relevant to the lung image database consortium. Acad Radiol (2004) 1.72
Bone marrow edema pattern in advanced hip osteoarthritis: quantitative assessment with magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with clinical examination, radiographic findings, and histopathology. Skeletal Radiol (2008) 1.68
Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 1.61
Direct reporting of results to patients: the future of radiology? Acad Radiol (2012) 1.61
Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening. Radiology (2003) 1.55
Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease. Radiology (2002) 1.53
Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance? AJR Am J Roentgenol (2010) 1.49
Short-interval follow-up mammography: are we doing the right thing? J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 1.49
MR Imaging of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: morphologic findings and interobserver reliability. Cardiology (2003) 1.44
Proposed ACGME change in length of radiology residency training before independent call: results of a survey of program directors and chief residents. J Am Coll Radiol (2007) 1.40
The ACR/Society of Breast Imaging Resident and Fellowship Training Curriculum for Breast Imaging, updated. J Am Coll Radiol (2012) 1.40
National telemedicine initiatives: essential to healthcare reform. Telemed J E Health (2009) 1.35
The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions for chronic disease management. Telemed J E Health (2014) 1.34
Computer-aided detection in clinical environment: benefits and challenges for radiologists. Radiology (2004) 1.34
Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 1.33
Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis: an empirical comparison of five methods. Acad Radiol (2004) 1.33
Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spat Vis (2007) 1.31
Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2010) 1.29
Radial fast spin-echo method for T2-weighted imaging and T2 mapping of the liver. J Magn Reson Imaging (2002) 1.27
Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 1.20
Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2006) 1.20
Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology (2007) 1.18
Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 1.17
Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA (2011) 1.15
Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables. Radiology (2009) 1.15
Improving the concordance of mammography assessment and management recommendations. Radiology (2006) 1.15
Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. Acad Radiol (2008) 1.13
Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA. Acad Radiol (2012) 1.13
The perception of breast cancer: what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography? Acad Radiol (2002) 1.12
Density and breast cancer risk. Radiology (2013) 1.12
Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology (2004) 1.09
Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 1.09
Effect of combined use of nonionic surfactant on formation of oil-in-water microemulsions. Int J Pharm (2005) 1.08
Factors affecting radiologist inconsistency in screening mammography. Acad Radiol (2002) 1.07
Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition. J Am Coll Radiol (2007) 1.05
On the repeated use of databases for testing incremental improvement of computer-aided detection schemes. Acad Radiol (2004) 1.04
The future of image perception in radiology: synergy between humans and computers. Acad Radiol (2003) 1.04
Sustaining and realizing the promise of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health (2013) 1.04
Reconciliation of diverse telepathology system designs. Historic issues and implications for emerging markets and new applications. APMIS (2012) 1.03
Assessing classifiers from two independent data sets using ROC analysis: a nonparametric approach. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell (2006) 1.03
Radiologist agreement for mammographic recall by case difficulty and finding type. J Am Coll Radiol (2012) 1.01
Virtual slide telepathology enables an innovative telehealth rapid breast care clinic. Hum Pathol (2009) 1.01
Interpreting data from audits when screening and diagnostic mammography outcomes are combined. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 1.01
A probabilistic expert system that provides automated mammographic-histologic correlation: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2004) 1.00
Reactions to uncertainty and the accuracy of diagnostic mammography. J Gen Intern Med (2007) 1.00
ATA practice guidelines for video-based online mental health services. Telemed J E Health (2013) 0.97
Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2011) 0.97
Decreased accuracy in interpretation of community-based screening mammography for women with multiple clinical risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 0.97
Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance. Radiology (2014) 0.96
Radiologists' attitudes and use of mammography audit reports. Acad Radiol (2010) 0.96
How human factors can influence the elderly in the use of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health (2010) 0.96
Using a visual discrimination model for the detection of compression artifacts in virtual pathology images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (2010) 0.95
Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2008) 0.95
Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice. Radiology (2011) 0.93
Correlation of radiologist rank as a measure of skill in screening and diagnostic interpretation of mammograms. Radiology (2006) 0.93
Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2007) 0.92
Thoracic aortic dissection and aneurysm: evaluation with nonenhanced true FISP MR angiography in less than 4 minutes. Radiology (2002) 0.91
Accuracy of stepping-table lower extremity MR angiography with dual-level bolus timing and separate calf acquisition: hybrid peripheral MR angiography. Radiology (2006) 0.91
Evaluation of proscriptive health care policy implementation in screening mammography. Radiology (2003) 0.90
Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Radiology (2004) 0.90
Quantitative analysis of hypoperfusion in acute stroke: arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast. Stroke (2013) 0.89
Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2010) 0.89
Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial. Radiology (2012) 0.89
Diagnostic mammography: identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria. Radiology (2013) 0.89
Integrating telemedicine and telehealth: putting it all together. Stud Health Technol Inform (2008) 0.89
The digital imaging workstation. 1990. J Digit Imaging (2003) 0.88
An approach to multiple-reader, multiple-case receiver operating characteristic analysis: controversial--or subtle? Acad Radiol (2003) 0.88
A review of the first five years of the University of Arizona telepsychiatry programme. J Telemed Telecare (2005) 0.88
Myelographic MR imaging of the cervical spine with a 3D true fast imaging with steady-state precession technique: initial experience. Radiology (2003) 0.87
Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities: analysis of components of variance. Acad Radiol (2003) 0.87
Pulmonary nodule detection in CT images with quantized convergence index filter. Med Image Anal (2006) 0.86
Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2007) 0.86
Academic radiology: the reasons to stay or leave. Acad Radiol (2003) 0.86
Gadodiamide T1 relaxivity in brain tissue in vivo is lower than in saline. Magn Reson Med (2005) 0.86
Establishing a gold standard for test sets: variation in interpretive agreement of expert mammographers. Acad Radiol (2013) 0.85
Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2014) 0.85
Feasibility and satisfaction with a tailored web-based audit intervention for recalibrating radiologists' thresholds for conducting additional work-up. Acad Radiol (2010) 0.85
Mosaics versus Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy seven standard fields for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity. Retina (2011) 0.84
Reversal of childhood idiopathic scoliosis in an adult, without surgery: a case report and literature review. Scoliosis (2009) 0.84
ATA practice guidelines for live, on-demand primary and urgent care. Telemed J E Health (2015) 0.84
Using a tailored web-based intervention to set goals to reduce unnecessary recall. Acad Radiol (2011) 0.84